1/92
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
piaget
interested in how people learn about the world around them
paying close attention to the wrong answers the children gave
You become smart by actively engaging with your environment
Knowledge begins with active interaction
Motor activity is important
Constructivist
developing a mental picture of the world
focus on representation of the world
Picking and choosing things from the environment
Piaget example
teaching the earth is round
How are children thinking about the Earth being round
Have a different perspective
Don’t have all the pieces
Try to connect to what they already know
Piaget Schemas
frameworks for interpreting and responding to experience
can be mental or physical
as get older → more abstract schemas
sucking on an object to understand the surroundings
cog dev when we try to connect experiences and schemas
Assimilation
fit observations into schema
accommodation
change schema to fit observation
ex of assimilation and accodmodation
A young child sees a wild rabbit for the first time after only domesticated ones
assimilation: assume it will behave like domesticated ones
accommodation: adjust their understanding of rabbits based on their observation
concludes rabbits are more variable than previously thought
trusted friend betrays you
assim: friend did it to protect you
accom: friend never was trustworthy
Piaget stage development
sensorimotor stage 0-2
pre-operational stage 2-7
concrete operations state 7-12
formal operations stage 12+
sensorimotor stage 0-2
babies are limited to immediate sensory experience
fosters cognitive development
reflex activity (0-1 month)
primary circular reactions (1-4 months)
secondary circular reactions (4 to 8 months)
coordination of secondary circular reactions (8 to 12 months)
tertiary circular reaction (12 to 18 months)
reflex activity (0-1 month)
baby has reflex schemas
looking, sucking, hearing, grasping
process info
slowly modified by infant
primary circular reactions (1-4 months)
pleasurable response centered around own body
don’t involve external things
secondary circular reactions (4 to 8 months)
pleasurable response centered around objects and events in the external world
coordination of secondary circular reactions (8 to 12 months)
combines previously acquired schemas to reach goal
lifts cover to pick up toy
Piaget said this shows object permanence
A not B error →
tertiary circular reaction (12 to 18 months)
active experimentation
discovering something and want to do something like it
instead of same over and over → slightly different
baby dropping different things
cognitive advancements seen at end of sensorimotor stage (18+ month) transitioning into the pre-operational stage
child not limited to immediate experience
delayed imitation → see something happen next day do that thing
visual imagery in problem solving → mentally imagine the path of the door crashing into pot
symbolic play →
piaget limitation of preoperational thought
centration: child can only focus on one aspect of a problem or object
• seen on classic conservation tasks
challenges to use science to improve developement
same influences can have diff consequences
often can’t systematically test effects
impractical or unethical
disagreement on goals
diff aspects of development affect each other
physical development and connection with social and emotional development
ex: learning to crawl is a social and emotional experience
Context of development matters
Effects of poverty
School uniforms
Public transit systems
Obvious conclusions may not be there when closer expected
Parents are not always to blame
Development can mean losing and gaining capacities
Specialization
Language development and not being able to pick up differences in other languages as you get older
Development through exploration
Latch onto what is a good fit
We learn better when we deeply process information
examples: connect what we learn to what we know, teach others
social coordination benefits learning and social connection
includes joint attention and contingency
How we feel about and understand our experience matters
Attributions have powerful psychological effects: answering why questions
Belongingness and sense of purpose can have a large impact
reasons to study child development
curiosity about people
• figuring out what babies know
• making sense of behaviors and outcomes
• teen risk-taking and mortality
animism
child attributes animate properties to inanimate objects
egocentrism
fails to take another’s perspective
covering eyes in hide and seek
3 mountain tasks - draw what the mountain looks like from the doll’s perspective
concrete operations stage
understand reversible logical systems
not fooled by superficial appearance
can think about multiple dimensions
formal operations stage
reason about abstract ideas
can reason hypothetically and systematically
pendulum problem understanding that only length of the string matters
logic games
can understand absract math
children actively construct knowledge
importance of active discovery
importance of engaging in meaningful activities
child is not vessel to be filled with facts
Major challenge to Piaget’s theory
• underestimated children’s competence by making his tests too hard
• babies may know where things are without being able to successfully search
ex: 5 month old infants search longer when object is hidden by darkness
ex: underestimation of babies
• On A not B task: more successful performance when reaching is disrupted with weight on wrist
Lev Vygotsky (1896-1934)
focus on learning as a collaborative process
• culture and social interaction matters
• effects still studied now
• private speech: tool for solving problems and regulating behavior
talking to yourself
transitions into inner speech as children develop, reflecting cognitive growth
• children use cultural tools that are shared in a particular
culture to make sense of the world
• language, writing systems, numerical notations, technology,
Children learn best in zone of proximal development
• difference between what a learner can do independently versus can achieve with support from a more knowledgeable person
• slightly above their current level
Vygotsky
social scaffolding
social support that helps children do more than on their own
infant play (4s alone versus 20s with caregiver)
autobiographical memory
talking about falling down at the pool
helping children solve their own problems
block tower keeps falling down
daily tasks
setting table, cleaning a bedroom
Vygotsky
learning from others
we depend on what others tell us
• many things children cannot learn from direct experience (e.g., history)
• children are bombarded with information; usually believe it even though it is sometimes inaccurate
Can occur in many ways. examples:
• observing how people respond to what others do
• e.g., a peer breaks a classroom rule
• modeling and imitation
learning from others example
effort and no effort condition
adult interacts with one toy
learn from other santa claus
many children told about Santa
taught he knowns what every child desires,, has sleigh pulled by flyer
children stop believing around 8
most common: testimony of others
• overhearing classmates, siblings reveal, ask parents
• second most common: first-hand experience
• seeing parent hide presents from Santa under the tree
• rarely: logic
• How many houses Santa would need to visit on a single night?
• sometimes induced broader skepticism about fantastical
beings like the Easter Bunny
by age 5 we already have many tools to evaluate evidence to decide what to believe
using context: children learned about made up animals called surnits
• less likely to say they believed they were real if told dragons or ghosts collect them than that doctors or scientists use them
• expertise
more likely to believe a strange fact about a fish from a zookeeper than a mechanic
prior history of accuracy
• more likely to believe someone who presents surprising
evidence, when it is clear that it is intentional
“You’re not going to believe this, but this is actually a dog”
• know people can have good and bad motives
• know people with bad motives may lie
• but will often leave with strangers despite being told not to do so
implication of development for public policy
school start times → later start for better grades
Nature vs nuture
hard to tell the affects apart
methods:
compare monozygotic and dizygotic twins
adoption is a natural experiment that creates genetic and enviormental relatives
behavioral genetics: heritability
heritability from 0 to 1
Heritability of 0.6 means 60% variability in the trait in a population is due to genetic differences
does not mean 60% caused by genetic factors
Heritability can increase with age
ex intelligence
9 years → 41% ; 12 years → 55% ; age 17 years → 66%
Choices amplify differences
With age you choose your environments
solving real world problems
managing anger and disappointment
calm down is not affective
many cognitive behavioral interventions are helpful
changing unhelpful thinking and behavior
preparing children for possible disappointment
turtle technique → preschool to demonstrate how he thinks himslef to stop and retreat until calm and can solve problem
narrative
emotional coaching
adults respond with empathy, guidance, and problem-solving
• as opposed to dismissing, punishing, or ignoring children’s negative emotions
key features
• validation (communicating that feelings are real and important)
• guidance (help child label emotions and link to experience)
• problem solving (support thinking through constructive responses)
• modeling (demonstrate emotion regulation skills) benefits
• emotion recognition
• emotion regulation
• builds trust and connection
emotional coaching examples
Child upset about losing a game
• Dismissive response: “Don’t be a sore loser. Stop crying.”
• Emotion coaching response: “It looks like you’re really disappointedabout losing. That makes sense. It’s hard when you try so hard and don’t win. Let’s think of ways you can practice for next time.”
Preschooler frightened of dark at bedtime
• Dismissive response: “There’s nothing to be scared of, just go to sleep.”
• Emotion coaching response: “I can see you’re scared about being alone in your room. Sometimes shadows can look big at night. Let’s name what’s here in the room together, and then I’ll show you a way to calm your body with a few deep breaths.
testing effectiveness of programs
extending what works
peer tutoring
certain board games
knowing what doesn’t
drug prevention
obesity letters
considering how developmental stage matters
promoting academic success
remedial programs
similar effects for school attendance awards
making use of psychological principles for children
promoting adaptive attributions
reappraisal in middle school transition
decreased disciplinary incidents
increased attendance
reduced failing grades
making use of psychological principles promote good habits
nudges: a subtle form of encouragement or suggestion that influences behavior without restricting freedom or voice
reduces friction for the desired outcome
choices easier and automatic
shoes near the door
defaults and physical structure of enviorment
nudges in childhood
change the environment so a helpful choice feels easy, natural, or fun
healthy snacks on table
child nudged to reach for healthier snack first
bright folder with HOMEWORK next to child’s shoes
nudges child to remember homework without having to tell them
when programs are not formally tested → we can still evaluate
anticipate consequences
apply psychological principles
apply knowledge of development
assessing recipient thinking and experience
case of giving money to families in Kenya
ex of untested program
color-coded ids
students given one of three colors for student ID
based on standardized testing
black - free admission to concerts and sports events
gold - some special privileges and discounts
white - no privileges and stand in seperate line
common strategies for data collection: self report
checklists, interviews, questionnaires
child behavior checklist: rate behavior
common strategies for data collection: observation
naturalistic
gives ecological validity
structured
control for situation
experimental method
gold standard for establishing causation
compare effects for conditions that vary in terms of only one thing of interest
variables
independent variable (IV): variable manipulated
dependent variable (DV): outcome measure
control group: comparison group for evaluation of a treatment
random assignment: each participant has same opportunity to be assigned to each group
Research challenges: interpreting experimental results
confounds: alternative explanation for findings
groups differ on factors other than what is manipulated
example: exercise on learning, but exercise group starts out knowing more
can control for factor
more commonly: do random assignment
mistakenly believed to be any experimental problem
Research challenges: measurement Presentation motive
person doing the observation present themselves or person in positive way
issue for self and other report + observation
EX: teachers’ gender bias, how many words parents report their child knows
Make self unobtrusive
technology, familiarity
Ethics issues
Research challenges: measurement knowledge problems
may not remember or have relevant knowledge to judge
how many hours does child sleep for?
how active is child?
understadning what is being asked
when did your child start talking
ambiguous questions such as does your child play sports or musical instruments
research challenges: defining constructs
what counts
coding responses
parents lying study
what counts as a lie
infant methodologies
habituation paradigm
present stimulus until subject is bored
change stimulus observe response
3 month olds tested:
infants focused on the relation between the actor and her goal only with prior experience reaching with sticky mittens
high amplitude sucking
access preferences based on sucking rate
before testing babies are taught they can choose between 2 diff recordings by changing how quickly they suck
own vs other mothers voice
preference for stories heard prenatally over another one they havent heard
preferential looking
access preferences
side by side comparison and which one they look at more
must watch for confounds
6 month old look longer at less probable events
longitudinal designs
test sample over time
ex: Kauai
predictors of resilience in coping with poverty
positive personal qualities like being easy going
close relationship with at least one parent or adult
longitudinal designs advantages and disadvantages
advantage: prediction over time
disadvantage: costly and time intensive
dropout
repeat testing may have effects
changes due to factors other than age
more fear of germs at age 10 than 5
but global pandemic effect
cross-sectional design
common to look at age related change
different age groups at the same time
advantage: low cost
disadvantage
cant look at change in individuals
change due to other factors than age
tech use is difference for 5 and 10 may not just be age related
longitudinal research on deprivation and poverty
romanian orphans
wanted to boost population: fertility used as instrument of state control
bad economy and high fertility
families couldn’t manage → orphans got little attention and human contact
rutter study
can good care make up for poor care in institutions in early life
165 romanian orphans adopted by British families
time varies: before 6 months all adopted by 42 months
assessments of social and cognitive development at 4, 6, 11, 15
only those adopted after 6 months had lasting deficits
attachment difficulties attention seeking overfamiliarty
limitation : orphans were NOT randomly assigned
psychological principles vs cultural learning
problem of WEIRD samples (White, educated, industrialized, rich, democratic)
diverse sample
allows determine what developmet is culturally specific
gives insight into what is possible
give insight into own cultures
risk and safety
what extent to children need to be protected
monitoring on playground
age to stay home unsupervised
tight vs loose cultures
core distinction: strength of social norms and intolerance of deviant behavior
tight: Pakistan Singapore
restrict the range of behavior deemed appropriate across everyday situations
loose: France, Netherlands
May result in high threat and need or social coordination for survival
asses with items like
people always comply with social norms
if someone inappropriately others with strongly disapprove
interconnected value
individualism vs collectivism
freedom and individuality vs group idenity
individualism: focus on rights and concerns of each person; independence, self-expression, and assertiveness encouraged
collectivism: focus on group harmony and shared responsibility; relational self-conception (actions reflect on family)
distinction is not about generosity
Learning by Observing and Pitching In (LOPI) developed by Rogoff
• prevalent in many Indigenous communities of the Americas
• central feature of LOPI: inclusion of children in communities
• Children’s motivation derives from their interest in contributing and belonging
Contrasted with what Rogoff calls “Assembly- Line Instruction” common in West vs LOPI
• creating child worlds separate from adult worlds
• tests students in contexts separate from the learning process and separate from contexts of productive use
• characterized by known-answer quizzing
• questions where the person asking knows answer, such as: “Where is your nose?”
• What are effects in cultures where this is uncommon
executive function
process that allow for goal directed action
regulation and control over cognitive processes
involves mental flexibility
executive function assesment
inhibit either an automatized distractor
examples: day night, head toes → override what they would normally do
flexibly switch between rules
dimensional card sorting test
color vs shapes sorting → dropped all the cards and children get better
executive function predicts
academic performance
attempts to teach general executive function
most fail, do not replicate, or do not generalize
in one context may not work for the other
claims that bilingualism, pretend play, and martial arts have positive effect are disputed
executive function need to be learned in domain specific way
depend on whether learning concrete and meaningful
brazillian candy seller used
learned in a way that meaningful to them
sometimes children have the required executive function capacities for a task but don’t value control
• “if children have the goal of completing a foot race as quickly as possible, they may engage control early and prepare (i.e., getting into the right stance and listening carefully for a signal) if they have knowledge that doing so benefits running performance (e.g., from observing or listening to others), [or] if they believe that running fast will please their friends or family... (Doebel, 2020)
• Interventions thus need to support knowledge, values, and beliefs
• Interventions also need to address factors that make it harder for children to exert EF when they want to
need capacity and motivation
learning strategies
least to most effective for understanding
passive - receiving info without overtly doing anything else related to learning
active - some form of action is undertaken - highlighting / copying problem solutions
constructive - learning generate something new like a concept map or explaining what the information means to them
interactive - both partner’s utterances are constructive + turn taking
why does enagaement matter
how the information is connected to what you already know
isolated knowledge is sometimes okay
better when we can connect
when active it is connected to
how do we know these levels of engagement matter
• Typical design: students spend the same amount of time in activities that require different levels of engagement and assessing learnings
• rereading (active) versus practice testing (constructive)
• Can you think of other ways to test this
promote better learning
• use and help others use more constructive and interactive strategies
• rather than show completed answer, show problem with step missing and have student figure that out
• explanation (including self-explanation)
• applying information to a new context
• write a mini-lecture
promoting better learning
strategies promote learning even when students get the answers wrong and are confused
even activities that are constructive can be more constructive
building models is more constructive than comparing models
teaching strategies can promote deep engagement, but do not determine engagement
can listen to lecture with no activities in a constructive way
intuitions are often wrong about what works
people often think they will learn more from rereading than from practice test
other factor that affect learning
struggle and timing of study strategies
productive struggle
timing matters
benefits of spacing out practice
benefits of intermixing types of problem types
benefits of cumulative review
promoting better learning: Even with good study strategies, we forget most of the details of what we learn
• even so, we may still be building mental models that let us interpret information and make sophisticated inferences.
example:
• show 6- to 9-year-olds a 7-minute video on how an engine works (Keil and others, 2021) → developed abstract thinking
engine expert detection test
watched the video created a mental model of the
Infantile amnesia
inability to retrieve early memories
instrumental condition
when they kick their foot the mobile moves
retest them and if their remember what they learned
2 month old can remember for 24 hours
6 months can remember for 2 weeks
conext is important for memory retrieval → bumper pads can affect the retrieval
memory before age 3
autobiographical events 6 months earlier
scripts → remember the sequence of events
early memories: false memories & source memory
false memories develop with repeated questions
asked whether bitten by a rat in the basement
most children said yes after a few weeks
source memory → how we know something?
if you thought about it or if it really happened
cant tell the difference between if it happened or not
same with adults
representing the world: appearance reality distinction
appearance reality distinction
when do children realize appearances can be deceiving
Classic shown deceptive objects
what does object look like
what is the object truly
3 yo have same answer for both
likely reflects confusion about what is real
fears of people in costumes
• trouble thinking about same thing in 2 ways at once 8
children success of some task
when asked to give experimenter “real X” versus “one that looks like X” → can see the real vs fake banana
when asked about eating contaminated food
Vegemite on bread, roach in drink → they said it was not okay to eat
why do they succeed
they understand appearances can be deceiving for simple task
they do not know the difference but repeating what they have heard
fragile understanding they can apply in some context vs others