Epicurus
'Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able to? Then he is not omnipotent. Is God able to prevent evil, but not willing to? Then he is malevolent. Is God able to prevent evil and willing to? Then why is there evil?'
Natural Evil
Refers to events that have bad or evil consequences when experienced by humans.
Moral Evil
Used by philosophers to refer to evil events or acts that are caused by human beings choosing freely to do the action in question.
Mackie
"If God is really omnipotent, then he must have power over all 'causal laws'"
Brothers Karamazov
Examples of Children and animals being tortured/suffering - exploring why a loving God would allow this to happen
Omnibenevolent
All loving
Omnipotent
All Powerful
Inconsistent Triad
How can God be omnipotent and omnibenevolent when evil exists
Privation
lack of something
Theodicy
an attempt to reconcile the existence of an all-loving omnipotent God with the existence of evil
Augustine
solves the problem by stating that God is responsible for evil in the world by defining evil as 'privation' 'Evil is not a substance'
Herbert McCabe
Bad grape/Deckchair Badness and evil = not living up to an expectation. Something lacks a quality it should have
Augustine bases his explanation on
Genesis 3 and Romans 5
Genesis 3 shows
Suffering is a result of disharmony = Adam and Eve ate from the tree
hierarchy of beings
God Angels Man Animals
Natural Evil
'Fallen angels' turn away from God and bring disharmony - this leads to natural evils, because of disharmony they cause in nature
Original Sin = moral evil
Garden of Eden characterised by a state of harmony. Suffering is a result of disharmony. Adam and Eve had a choice. They choose not to be in harmony with God. The cause of Moral Evil!
Point of free will
Allowing evil to happen is a price worth paying for human freedom. It means God allows evil. No free will would remove all the good choices. Contrast between good and evil highlights beauty of goodness
Soul Deciding
we choose to turn back to God and be moral
Strengths of Augustine
The idea that evil can arise when people exercise free will fits with what we see around us. It is based on the bible and does not contradict the scriptures Evil is not originally part of God's creative work
Weaknesses of Augustine
Concept of evil being a privation yet not part of God's creation is illogical. People who are suffering may not find this theodicy convincing as pain is real. Evil appears from nowhere
Free Will Defence
We are to know a genuine love for God, it must be freely given. This is why freedom of the will is so important to Augustine. Augustine argues: For a world with the evils that follow from free will is better than one without it
Irenaeus
Evil serves a purpose
Genesis = literal
Adam and Eve made in the image of God. Image = form of God - in intelligence, morality, personality. Grow into the Likeness = content of God
The serpent is to blame because
Adam and Eve like children in their maturity - lack wisdom to make the right choices. They are not being rebellious
Punishment: Irenaeus
Punishment had to be given - just like children need punishment from parents and boundaries - in order to develop a sense of morality
Process of Learning
Just like Jonah learnt repentance through his time in the belly of the whale
Vale of Soul Making
Suffering is a necessity - it helps us to grow and develop in character - to be more Christ-like. We grow into the likeness of God (moral perfection)
Swinburne
"we would never learn the art of goodness in a world designed as a complete paradise"
Evil and Suffering are
Useful as a means of knowledge. Hunger leads to pain. Knowledge of pain, leads us to help others
Epistemic Distance
express the idea that God's existence is not obvious and thus human beings are not overwhelmed by God's presence into believing in God
Free Will
Throughout our lives we change from being human animals to 'children of God' in his likeness This is a FREE choice, made after struggle and experience
Jesus
The incarnation of God in Jesus unites human beings with God once again. Jesus is the Saviour of human beings. Irenaeus argues that Jesus is the new Adam who obeys God and dies on the cross and thus undoes the fault of Adam
Eschatological Aspect
Believed salvation was available for all - but we have free will to choose - so some will go to heaven and some hell
Universal Salvation
Hick suggests that everyone will be saved.
Recapitulation
'bring something back to the head or beginning'; it also means to 'summarise or sum up something'. Irenaeus' theodicy is about bringing people back into relationship with God.
Process Theodicy
It is based on the premise that God is NOT omnipotent
Whitehead describes God as...
'fellow sufferer who understands'
Why Process Theology works
Removes stumbling block of an all-loving and all-powerful God. God suffers - believers feel God understands pain and suffering. No certainty of God triumphing in the end - believers encouraged to join in fight against evil
Why Process Theology doesn't work
It is not a REAL theodicy. Remember a theodicy aims to justify an all-powerful God in the face of evil. Instead this denies the God of classical theism