1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
It is a contradicting argument
This is because it is backed up by scientific causes but based on divine ideas
The universe resembles natural organisms rather than human inventions
Therefore the comparison in unreasonable
Hume criticises the bad analogy
This is because we have insufficient knowledge of the universe to postulate a God and even if there was a designer of the earth it may not be God and there could be more than one God
Hume suggests that the existence of evil points to a bad designer
Because the analogy humanises God
Hume suggests that the universe could have been a random accident
Just because things in our existence are designed doesn’t mean that the universe was designed
The Epicurean hypothesis implies that the emergence of a stable environment was inevitable
This is because atoms and time are unlimited
Darwins theory of evolution means natural selection can explain the complexity and beauty of nature
Therefore the world seems organised and ordered as it has gradually developed to support life and not because it was designed
Richard Dawkins argues the world has not been designed
But instead evolution gives the appearance of an apparent design
Kant says order is a human concept and we impose order to make sense of the world
Order does not actually exist so it is not a mark of design so there cannot be a designer God