All (10702)
Notes (10000)
note
Pluralist view✅
Updated 266d ago
0.0(0)
note
Pluralist approach✅
Updated 280d ago
0.0(0)
note
IGNORE
Updated 399d ago
0.0(0)
note
ignore
Updated 202d ago
0.0(0)
note
ignore
Updated 545d ago
0.0(0)
note
Chapter 14: Social Psychology
Updated 1241d ago
0.0(0)
note
Unit 9: Social Psychology  (copy)
Updated 1229d ago
0.0(0)
note
Unit 9: Social Psychology
Updated 1242d ago
0.0(0)
note
Veil of Ignorance - Rawls
Updated 592d ago
0.0(0)
note
Chapter 9: Social Psychology
Updated 1241d ago
0.0(0)
note
POLS233-Voter Ignorance
Updated 299d ago
0.0(0)
note
5.7 The Veil of Ignorance
Updated 604d ago
0.0(0)
Flashcards (227)
flashcards
📝 THEOC 1301 — QUIZ 1 COMPLETE STUDY GUIDE 🟣 SESSION 1: INTRODUCTION TO THEOLOGY slide 2 — overview: theology theology = a reasoning process about god and all he has made known to us through divine revelation. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf in simpler words: theology is using reason/thinking to understand what god has revealed. MEMORIZE: theology = reasoning about god + divine revelation ⸻ slide 3 — overview: oikonomia oikonomia = economy it means: * stewardship * administration it refers to: the works by which god reveals himself and communicates his life. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf MEMORIZE: oikonomia = stewardship/administration + god revealing himself and communicating his life ⸻ slide 4 — the bible the bible is: * the primary source for studying theology * the inspired and inerrant word of god * god’s self-communication to us * given for the sake of our salvation the slide also says: “the study of the sacred page should be the very soul of sacred theology” — dei verbum 24 THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf what you need to understand: the bible is extremely important to theology because it is god communicating himself to us, and theology studies it to understand what god has revealed. MEMORIZE: bible = primary source + inspired/inerrant word of god + god’s self-communication + salvation ⸻ slide 5 — the church fathers the slide connects theology with: “faith seeking understanding” this is from st. anselm. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf fathers the fathers are: * orthodox * holy * pre-800 ad doctors doctors are people who made significant contributions through profound understanding of the faith. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf easiest way to remember: fathers → orthodox + holy + before 800 doctors → significant contributors + profound understanding ⸻ slide 6 — the magisterium what is the magisterium? the official teaching authority of the church. the pope’s primary duties regarding christ’s teaching: 1. protect 2. interpret 3. pass down THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf MEMORIZE: magisterium = official teaching authority pope = protect, interpret, pass down ⸻ ⭐ slide 11 — the vocation of the theologian 🚨 ESSAY TOPIC this is one of the most important sections. the theologian’s vocation is: to pursue an ever-deeper understanding of the word found in scripture, handed on by tradition, in communion with the magisterium. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf the theologian also: * responds to the invitation of truth * seeks to understand faith * helps the people of god give an accounting for their hope * seeks truth so people can become disciples * communicates the faith * serves love by giving people better knowledge of god THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf basically: the theologian is supposed to understand the faith more deeply and help other people understand it too. ⭐ essay formula: deeper understanding → scripture + tradition → communion with magisterium → help people understand faith → communicate faith → better knowledge of god ⸻ slide 12 — vocation of the theologian, continued the theologian should: 1. deepen their own faith they unite: research + prayer 2. use proper intellectual standards they should be attentive to: * epistemological requirements * critical standards * rational verification 3. grow spiritually they should make a spiritual effort to grow in: virtue + holiness THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf remember: the theologian needs BOTH: intellectual growth → research + critical thinking + rational verification spiritual growth → prayer + virtue + holiness ⸻ slide 13 — vocation of the theologian, continued theologians understand revelation through: * philosophical concepts * historical disciplines * human sciences BUT: the ultimate normative principle is revealed doctrine. their teaching must in no way harm the doctrine of the faith. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf there is freedom within the church’s faith. the theologian should also be open to: * objective discussion * fraternal dialogue * modifying their own opinions THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf ⭐ important idea: theologians can think, research, and discuss, but their work remains within the church’s faith and revealed doctrine. ⸻ ⭐ slide 17 — magisterium & theology (collaborative) 🚨 ESSAY TOPIC the magisterium and theology have the same goal: preserving the people in truth. but they have different roles: magisterium → authentically teaches doctrine theology → strives to clarify revelation with regard to reason the theologian must present doctrine with full accuracy and integrity. the magisterium’s infallible pronouncements call for assent of theological faith. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf memorize: same goal, different roles. ⸻ slide 18 — magisterium & theology (continued) definitive truths the magisterium’s definitive truths concerning: faith + morals must be: firmly accepted and held. non-definitive teaching teaching meant to: * aid understanding * guard against error calls for: religious submission of will and intellect. theologians theologians are expected to loyally submit to the teaching of the magisterium, including when it intervenes authoritatively. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf memorize this distinction: definitive → firmly accepted and held non-definitive → religious submission of will + intellect ⸻ slide 19 — magisterium & theology (continued) the relationship isn’t necessarily perfect agreement all the time. the slide says magisterial documents might not be free from all deficiencies. there can also be: non-hostile tensions between theologians and the magisterium. these tensions can become a dynamic factor stimulating both when they practice dialogue. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf basically: disagreement/tension isn’t automatically bad. non-hostile tension + dialogue → can stimulate both ⸻ slide 20 — magisterium & theology (continued) the theologian should not present personal opinions or divergences as if they were non-arguable conclusions. also: conscience is NOT an autonomous and exclusive authority for deciding doctrinal truth. obedience of faith leads to loyal acceptance of the magisterium’s teaching. if difficulties continue, the theologian should: make the problems known to the magisterium — NOT the mass media. they should also remain open to a deeper examination of the question. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf ⭐ remember: personal opinion ≠ unquestionable doctrine problem → magisterium, not mass media ⸻ slide 24 — dissent: following one’s conscience the slide says: “following one’s conscience” cannot legitimate dissent. a right conscience is: * illumined by faith * based on objective moral law * has an upright will * pursues the true good things that are NOT legitimate include: * polling public opinion * pressuring through public opinion * claiming there is a consensus among theologians * presenting theologians as a prophetic “base” THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf important: the slide isn’t saying conscience doesn’t matter. it’s saying following your conscience cannot simply be used as a justification for dissent. ⸻ 🟢 slide 27 — why study theology? truth is food + truth is light revealed truth = food we need to be nourished by it. the eucharist ensures we aren’t entirely unnourished. doctrine = light much of reality can only be known if god tells us. the church helps communicate some truths even to people who aren’t very interested. living undernourished or half in the dark is a pity. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf MEMORIZE: truth = food doctrine = light ⸻ slide 28 — why study theology? ignorance is not a virtue ignorance is not a virtue. why? knowledge serves love. more knowledge of god: → helps us love him more → removes misunderstandings → gives us more reasons to love him. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf memorize: knowledge of god → greater love ⸻ slide 29 — ignorance is not a virtue continued the slide says millions are spiritually “starved” because they lack truth and don’t have the eucharist. the slide says spiritual starvation should largely be relieved by the laity, because they are in contact with those who need it. the laity need to understand the great dogmas: * for the sake of those who are hungry * and for their own sake. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf key idea: laity → understand the great dogmas → help relieve spiritual starvation ⸻ slide 30 — ignorance is not a virtue continued studying theology should be accompanied by: reading scripture because scripture has a wonderful power to make truths: come alive in the soul. THEO2301 Session01 (1 per page)(1).pdf ⸻ 🔵 SESSION 2 — FAITH & REASON slide 2 — faith & reason main idea: there can’t be a real discrepancy between faith and reason. why? because the light of both comes from god. THEO2301 Session02 (1 per page).pdf memorize: faith + reason don’t truly contradict because both come from god. ⸻ slide 3 — faith defined you have THREE definitions. biblical: “the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.” dogmatic: faith is: * a gift of god * a human act * complete submission of intellect + will to god common sense: faith = complete trust and confidence in someone. THEO2301 Session02 (1 per page).pdf MEMORIZE THIS: biblical → assurance of things hoped for dogmatic → gift of god + intellect/will submitted to god common sense → trust/confidence ⸻ slide 4 — knowledge revealed by god knowledge directly revealed by god is: more certain than knowledge gained through mere human experience. THEO2301 Session02 (1 per page).pdf that’s basically the entire slide. ⸻ slide 5 — faith is absolute trust faith = absolute trust in god. and this is: eminently reasonable. THEO2301 Session02 (1 per page).pdf again, this reinforces the idea that faith isn’t opposed to reason. ⸻ slide 9 — mysteries of christian faith the mysteries of christian faith: transcend human reason BUT never contradict reason. THEO2301 Session02 (1 per page).pdf THIS DISTINCTION IS IMPORTANT: transcend = go beyond contradict = go against so: faith can go beyond what human reason can fully understand without contradicting reason. ⸻ slide 10 — qualities of faith faith is: * personal + communal relationship * seeks understanding * friend of reason * necessary for salvation * gift of grace * free human act * believes with conviction in a message THEO2301 Session02 (1 per page).pdf memorize the list. ⸻ slide 11 — challenges to faith 1. “wall” of separation faith should have no impact on the state/society. 2. ideological secularism the idea that: we are self-sufficient + self-explanatory therefore: faith isn’t needed. THEO2301 Session02 (1 per page).pdf ⸻ slide 16 — complementary forms of wisdom there are two: philosophical wisdom the naturally limited capacity of the intellect to explore reality. theological wisdom explores the contents of faith based upon revelation. THEO2301 Session02 (1 per page).pdf memorize: philosophical → intellect → reality theological → revelation → faith they are complementary, meaning they’re meant to work together. ⸻ slide 17 — faith + reason this is another VERY important contrast: without faith: reason is in danger of losing sight of its final goal. without reason: faith has stressed feeling and experience. THEO2301 Session02 (1 per page).pdf easiest way: reason needs faith faith needs reason ⸻ slide 18 — st. bonaventure this is basically a warning about separating intellectual study from spiritual life. the slide says theologians should recognize the inadequacy of things like: * reading without repentance * knowledge without devotion * research without wonder * prudence without joy * action divorced from religion * learning separated from love * intelligence without humility * study without divine grace * thought without wisdom inspired by god THEO2301 Session02 (1 per page).pdf don’t worry about memorizing every word. remember the overall point: studying and intelligence aren’t enough by themselves; they need devotion, humility, love, religion, and divine grace. ⸻ slide 19 — final conclusion 1. god can be known with certitude by reason from created things. 2. revelation is necessary because we are ordained for a supernatural end that surpasses human understanding. THEO2301 Session02 (1 per page).pdf easiest way: reason → can know god revelation → necessary because supernatural end surpasses human understanding
10
Updated 2d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Absolutely. Since this covers a lot of material, I’d turn it into a master study note with simple definitions, key ideas, and what you should remember for the exam. PHILOS 01 — Master Study Notes 1. Ideas of Philosophy Philosophy Philosophy means the love of wisdom. It is the study of big questions about reality, knowledge, morality, existence, and how we should live. Philosophy begins in wonder Philosophy begins when we become curious and ask “Why?” or “What is this?” instead of simply accepting things as they appear. Example: Instead of just seeing a tree, a philosopher might ask: • What does it mean for something to exist? • How do I know the tree is really there? • What makes something alive? Arguments An argument is reasoning used to support a conclusion. • Premises = reasons/evidence • Conclusion = what the argument is trying to prove Example: • Premise: All humans are mortal. • Premise: Socrates is human. • Conclusion: Socrates is mortal. 2. Fallacies of Reasoning A fallacy is a mistake in reasoning that makes an argument weak or misleading. Important idea A fallacy can sound convincing but still be logically wrong. When studying fallacies, ask: “Does the evidence actually support the conclusion?” 3. Branches of Philosophy Branch Main Question Logic How should we reason correctly? Epistemology What is knowledge? How do we know? Metaphysics What is reality/existence? Ethics What is right and wrong? How should we live? Aesthetics What is beauty/art? Social & Political Philosophy How should society and government work? Easy way to remember: Logic = reasoning Epistemology = knowledge Metaphysics = reality Ethics = morality Aesthetics = beauty Political philosophy = society/government 4. Socrates 5 Who was Socrates? Socrates was an ancient Greek philosopher who focused heavily on questioning people and examining their beliefs. He did not write books himself. Much of what we know about him comes from Plato's dialogues. The Delphic Oracle The Oracle at Delphi reportedly declared that no one was wiser than Socrates. Socrates questioned this because he believed he was not wise. He eventually realized that his wisdom came from recognizing his own ignorance. “One thing only I know, I know nothing.” This expresses Socratic humility. Socrates understood that recognizing what you do not know is an important form of wisdom. “The unexamined life is not worth living.” Socrates believed people should examine their beliefs, choices, and lives rather than simply going along with everyone else. Trial of Socrates Socrates was charged with: 1. Corrupting the youth 2. Not believing in the gods of Athens 3. Introducing new gods/deities He was found guilty and sentenced to death. Metaphors of Socrates Midwife • Socrates compared himself to a midwife. • A midwife helps someone give birth. • Socrates believed he helped people give birth to ideas through questioning. Gadfly • A gadfly is an insect that annoys or stings. • Socrates saw himself as someone who bothered Athens by challenging people to think. Stingray • A stingray can paralyze or numb someone. • Socrates' questioning could leave people confused and unsure of what they thought they knew. Remember Socrates: QUESTION EVERYTHING + EXAMINE YOUR LIFE + RECOGNIZE YOUR IGNORANCE 5. Plato 5 Plato was a student of Socrates. He wrote dialogues, many of which feature Socrates. Plato's Two Realms Physical realm The world we experience with our senses. Characteristics: • Time • Change/becoming • Physical objects • Opinion Metaphysical realm A higher, unchanging reality. Characteristics: • Eternity • Being • Forms • Knowledge Forms Forms are perfect, unchanging realities or concepts. Example: You can see many different chairs, but Plato would say there is a perfect Form of Chair that individual chairs imperfectly represent. 6. Allegory of the Cave The Allegory of the Cave explains the difference between appearance and reality. Imagine prisoners chained inside a cave. They can only see shadows on a wall and believe the shadows are reality. One prisoner escapes and discovers the outside world. What it means: Cave = ignorance Shadows = appearances/opinions Leaving cave = gaining knowledge Outside world = higher reality Sun = ultimate truth/the Good Main idea: People may mistake what they see or believe for reality. Education and philosophy can help people discover deeper truth. 7. Divided Line of Knowledge Plato divides understanding into levels. Lower levels: Images → Physical objects Higher levels: Mathematical reasoning → Forms The higher you move, the closer you get to genuine knowledge. Easy idea: Opinion → Reasoning → Knowledge 8. Aristotle 6 Aristotle was a student of Plato but disagreed with some of Plato's ideas. Universals A universal is a characteristic shared by many individual things. Example: Many different objects can be red. The individual objects are different, but redness is something they share. Third Man Argument This is an argument that challenges Plato's theory of Forms. If individual things and their Form are both “man,” then you may need another Form to explain what they have in common. This could continue forever. Basic idea: Plato's Forms may create an infinite regress. 9. Potentiality and Actuality Aristotle believed things have: Potentiality What something could become. Actuality What something is currently. Example: A seed has the potentiality to become a tree. A grown tree is the actuality of that potential. Remember: Potential = could be Actual = is 10. Aristotle's Four Causes Aristotle used four causes to explain why something exists or what explains it. 1. Material Cause What is it made of? Example: A statue is made of marble. 2. Formal Cause What is its form/design? Example: The shape of the statue. 3. Efficient Cause Who or what made it? Example: The sculptor. 4. Final Cause What is its purpose? Example: The statue was created as a memorial. Memory trick: Material = matter Formal = form Efficient = maker Final = purpose 11. Aristotle's Ethics Aristotle asked: How can human beings live a happy life? He believed happiness comes from living excellently and developing virtue. Eudaimonia Eudaimonia = human flourishing / living well It is more than temporary pleasure. It means living a good, meaningful, virtuous life. The Golden Mean Virtue is often found between two extremes. Deficiency ← Mean → Excess Example: Courage • Cowardice = deficiency • Courage = mean • Recklessness = excess Important: The mean is not always exactly halfway. It is the appropriate amount for the situation. Aristotle: Virtue = finding the appropriate mean between extremes. 12. Ten Categories of Aristotle Aristotle developed categories for describing what things are. Important categories include: • Substance • Quantity • Quality • Relation • Place • Time • Position • State • Action • Passion Most important: Substance = what something fundamentally is. 13. Hellenistic Philosophers After Aristotle, philosophy became strongly focused on: How should I live? Three important philosophers/traditions in your study guide are: • Epicurus • Epictetus • Plotinus 14. Epicurus 5 Epicurus believed pleasure is the greatest good, but he did not mean constant partying or luxury. For Epicurus, the best life is peaceful and free from unnecessary suffering. Goals: • Peace of mind • Health of the body • Avoid unnecessary pain • Avoid unnecessary fear Important: Not every pleasure should be chosen. Sometimes a pleasure can cause greater pain later. Example: Eating too much junk food might feel pleasurable now but make you feel sick later. Types of Pleasures Natural and necessary Things necessary for basic well-being. Examples: • Food • Water • Shelter Natural but unnecessary Pleasures that are natural but aren't required. Unnatural/unnecessary Desires that can become excessive. Examples: • Extreme wealth • Fame • Status Letter to Menoeceus Epicurus explains his philosophy of living a peaceful and happy life. Remember Epicurus: Good life = simple pleasures + peace of mind + little fear 15. Epictetus 5 Epictetus was a Stoic philosopher. Stoicism teaches that we should focus on what is within our control and accept what is outside our control. What is in our power? Things such as: • Our judgments • Our choices • Our reactions • Our attitudes What is beyond our power? Things such as: • Other people's actions • The past • Other people's opinions • Many external events Famous idea: “People are disturbed not by things but the views they take of things.” Meaning: The event itself isn't always what causes our emotional reaction. Our interpretation of the event matters. Another important quote: “Demand not that things happen as you wish…” Meaning: Don't demand that reality match exactly what you want. Instead, learn to accept reality and respond wisely. The Enchiridion The Enchiridion is a handbook/summary of Stoic teachings associated with Epictetus. Remember Epictetus: CONTROL WHAT YOU CAN + ACCEPT WHAT YOU CAN'T 16. Plotinus Plotinus developed Neoplatonism, which was influenced by Plato. The One At the center of Plotinus' philosophy is The One. The One is the ultimate source of reality. It is beyond ordinary description. Mystical Experience Plotinus believed people could experience a mystical union with The One. The Enneads Plotinus' philosophical writings are collecte in The Enneads. Remember: Plotinus = Neoplatonism + The One + mystical experience 17. Hypatia 4 Hypatia was a: • Neoplatonist philosopher • Astronomer • Mathematician • Teacher • Counselor She was a pagan and was murdered in Alexandria. Remember: Hypatia = philosopher + mathematician + astronomer + teacher 18. Metaphysics & Epistemology Metaphysics Studies reality and existence. Questions: • What exists? • What is reality? • What is the nature of being? Epistemology Studies knowledge. Questions: • What is knowledge? • How do we know something? • Can we be certain? 19. Important Terminology Dualism Reality consists of two fundamentally different kinds of things. Example: • Mind • Body Materialism / Physicalism Everything that exists is ultimately physical/material. Easy: Only physical reality exists. Idealism Reality is fundamentally connected to mind, ideas, or consciousness rather than matter alone. Pantheism God and the universe are understood as closely identified. Easy: God = nature/universe Monism Reality ultimately consists of one fundamental substance or reality. Easy: One fundamental reality Skepticism Questions whether we can have certain knowledge. Easy: “How do I know that I really know?” 20. Descartes 5 Descartes wanted to discover something that was certain. Skepticism as the Key to Certainty He used methodological doubt. He questioned: • His senses • His experiences • The external world • Even mathematical beliefs He wanted to doubt everything that could possibly be doubted. Cogito Ergo Sum “I think, therefore I am.” Even if Descartes doubts everything, he cannot doubt that he is thinking. And if he is thinking, he must exist as a thinking being. Remember: Doubting = thinking → thinking proves existence Clear and Distinct Ideas Descartes believed ideas that are perceived clearly and distinctly can provide certainty. Cartesian Dualism Descartes believed there are two fundamentally different substances: Mind • Thinking • Nonphysical Body • Physical • Extended in space Remember: Descartes = mind + body 21. Spinoza = 5 Spinoza disagreed with Descartes' idea of two separate substances. One Substance Spinoza believed there is only one substance. He identified this with God/Nature. This makes Spinoza a form of monism. Remember: Spinoza = ONE substance 22. Conatus Conatus = the drive or tendency of everything to preserve and continue its existence. Think: “I want to keep existing.” It is like a fundamental life force or striving. 23. Spinoza: Active vs. Passive Emotions This is important. Passive emotions These happen to us. We are being affected by something outside ourselves. Examples: • Fear • Jealousy • Anger • Sadness We don't fully understand the cause, so we are less in control. Active emotions These come from understanding and reason. When we understand why something happens, we become more capable of responding rationally. Easy comparison: Passive = something controls my emotional response Active = understanding gives me greater control Spinoza's goal: Move from passive emotions → active emotions through understanding. 24. Thought and Extension Spinoza described two attributes’ humans can understand: Thought The mental/intellectual aspect. Extension The physical/material aspect.. They are not two separate substances. Instead, they are different ways of understanding the same underlying reality. 25. Leibniz Leibniz believed reality is made up of fundamental units called monads. Monads Monads are: • Nonphysical • Simple/basic units of reality • Not physical atoms Remember: Leibniz = Monads Principle of Identity Something is itself. A = A. Example: A dog is a dog. Principle of Sufficient Reason Everything that happens or exists must have a sufficient reason explaining why it is that way rather than another way. Easy: “Why is this the way it is?” There must be a reason. — FINAL CRASH NOTES: PART 2 JOHN LOCKE Tabula Rasa = “Blank Slate” Locke believed the mind is not born filled with ideas. Instead, the mind starts like a blank slate, and knowledge develops through experience. Tabula rasa = blank slate “Nothing exists in the mind that was not first in the senses.” Meaning: We first experience things through our senses, and those experiences become ideas in our minds. Easy example: Baby sees → hears → touches → tastes → experiences the world → develops knowledge. 🔑 Remember: LOCKE = EXPERIENCE GEORGE BERKELEY Idealism Berkeley believed that reality is fundamentally connected to perception/mind. He rejected the idea that physical matter exists independently of perception in the way people usually assume. Famous phrase: Esse est percipi Meaning: “To be is to be perceived.” Simple example: You see a chair. Berkeley focuses on the chair as something perceived rather than saying there is a completely independent material chair existing exactly as we imagine it outside perception. 🔑 Remember: BERKELEY = PERCEPTION DAVID HUME Skepticism Hume was skeptical about what we can know with certainty. He argued that what we directly experience are perceptions. Famous quote: “The only existences of which we are certain, are perceptions.” What does that mean? You experience: • sights • sounds • feelings • thoughts • sensations But Hume questions whether we can be absolutely certain about things beyond those perceptions. Modified Skeptic Hume does not necessarily say: “Nothing is real.” Instead, he recognizes that humans naturally believe things based on experience, even though we cannot always prove them with absolute certainty. 🔑 Remember: HUME = SKEPTICISM Think: “Can I really be certain?” 🧠 LOCKE vs. BERKELEY vs. HUME This is VERY important. Philosopher Main Idea Memory Word Locke Knowledge comes from experience Experience Berkeley Being is connected to perception Perception Hume We should be skeptical about certainty Skepticism Memorize this: Locke → Experience Berkeley → Perception Hume → Skepticism IMMANUEL KANT Kant is probably one of the more difficult philosophers on your study guide, so don't overcomplicate him. Copernican Revolution in Philosophy Before Kant, philosophers often asked: How does our mind understand the world? Kant changed the way people thought about the relationship between the mind and reality. His basic idea: Our minds help structure the way we experience reality. Instead of the mind simply receiving information from the world, the mind actively organizes experience. Easy way to think about it: World → Mind doesn't just receive it → Mind organizes experience Phenomena vs. Noumena This is VERY important. Phenomena What we experience/perceive. It's reality as it appears to us. Think: Phenomena = appearance/experience Noumena Things-in-themselves. Reality as it exists independently of how humans experience it. Kant called this: Das Ding-an-sich German for: “The Thing-In-Itself” Think: Phenomena = what I experience Noumena = thing as it is in itself 🚨 SUPER EASY KANT MEMORY TRICK P = Phenomena = Perceived N = Noumena = Not directly known So: P = what appears N = thing-in-itself CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE This is Kant's major idea in ethics. The categorical imperative basically says: Act according to principles that you could want everyone to follow. Example: You want to lie to get something. Ask: “What if everyone lied whenever it benefited them?” If everyone did that, trust and communication would break down. Therefore, lying isn't something you could consistently want as a universal rule. Easy version: Would it be okay if EVERYONE did this? If not, don't do it. 🔑 Remember: KANT = UNIVERSAL MORAL RULE 🧠 KANT IN ONE MINUTE Kant: Copernican Revolution → Mind helps organize experience. Phenomena → Reality as we experience it. Noumena → Things-in-themselves. Categorical Imperative → Act according to rules you could want everyone to follow. Memory sentence: Kant says our minds organize experience, we experience phenomena rather than directly knowing noumena, and morality requires universal principles. 🌎 CONTINENTAL TRADITION Now your study guide moves into: Existentialism Existentialism focuses heavily on the individual person and their experience of existence. It asks questions like: • Why am I here? • What does my life mean? • How should I live? • How do I deal with suffering? • Do I have freedom? • How do I deal with uncertainty? PHENOMENOLOGY Phenomenology focuses on conscious experience. Basically: What is it like to experience something from the first-person perspective? Instead of immediately asking whether something objectively exists, phenomenology examines how it appears in our experience. Remember: Phenomenology = experience/consciousness EXISTENTIALISM — MAIN CONCEPTS Your study guide gives you several phrases. Let's translate them into normal language. Focus on the individual Existentialism focuses on your individual existence and choices. Not just: “What does society tell me to do?” But: “What am I going to choose?” Confrontation with the world Humans have to deal with a world that doesn't always give us clear answers. Life can be confusing, difficult, and unpredictable. Existential predicament The difficult situation of being a human being who has: • freedom • responsibility • uncertainty • mortality • choices THE WORLD IS ABSURD Absurd does not simply mean “funny.” It means there can be a conflict between: Our desire for meaning and A world that doesn't provide obvious meaning. THE WORLD IS IRRATIONAL The world doesn't always operate according to what seems fair or logical to us. Bad things can happen to good people. Good things can happen to bad people. We don't always get answers. EXISTENTIAL EMOTIONS Your study guide lists: • Senselessness • Anxiety • Dread • Self-doubt • Despair These are connected to confronting existence and uncertainty. Easy way: “What am I supposed to do with my life when there aren't easy answers?” That is an existential question. SØREN KIERKEGAAR 4 Kierkegaard is considered an important precursor/foundational thinker of existentialism. He focused heavily on: • Individual existence • Choice • Anxiety • Despair • Faith • Personal responsibility Important idea: Kierkegaard believed that individuals must personally confront the difficult choices of existence. You cannot simply let society make all your choices for you. NOLOGY 🌎 1. Continental Tradition The Continental tradition focuses heavily on questions about: • Human existence • Meaning • Freedom • Individual experience • Anxiety • Society • What it means to be human Two major areas in your guide: Existentialism Focuses on the individual and their existence. Phenomenology Focuses on conscious experience and how things appear to us. Easy memory: Existentialism = How do I live? Phenomenology = How do I experience? EXISTENTIALISM Main Concepts Focus on the individual Existentialists are interested in the individual people: • Choices • Freedom • Responsibility • Meaning • Identity Confrontation with the world People must face a world that doesn't always give them easy answers. Existential predicament Humans must deal with: • Freedom • Choices • Death • Uncertainty • Responsibility • Meaning The world is absurd Absurd means there is a conflict between our desire for meaning and a world that may not provide obvious meaning. The world is irrational Life doesn't always make sense. Things don't always happen according to what seems fair or logical. Existential emotions You may experience: Anxiety → dread → self-doubt → despair These can come from confronting freedom, uncertainty, death, and meaning. 🧔 2. SØREN KIERKEGAARD 4 ⭐ Main idea: The individual must personally choose how to live. Kierkegaard is an important early existentialist thinker. Three Stages of Life 1. Aesthetic Stage Living for: • Pleasure • Entertainment • Immediate experiences The person avoids deeper commitment. Think: “I just want to enjoy myself.” 2. Ethical Stage The person begins taking: • Responsibility • Commitment • Morality more seriously. Think: “I have responsibilities, and my choices matter.” 3. Religious Stage The individual develops a personal relationship with God/faith. This requires a leap of faith. Leap of Faith A leap of faith means making a commitment to faith even though you cannot prove everything through reason. Important: Kierkegaard believed faith involves personal commitment, not simply intellectually knowing facts about religion. Importance of the Individual Kierkegaard emphasized that truth and faith must become personally lived. Remember: Kierkegaard = Individual + stages + leap of faith 🧔‍♂️ 3. FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE 4 Nietzsche is VERY important. ⭐ Main ideas: Will to power + master/slave morality + Ubermensch + eternal recurrence Eternal Recurrence Nietzsche asks you to imagine: What if you had to live your exact life over and over again forever? Every decision. Every mistake. Every happiness. Everything. Why does he ask this? It challenges you to ask: “Am I living my life in a way that I could accept repeating forever?” 🐪 Camel → 🦁 Lion → 👶 Child This represents stages of transformation. 🐪 Camel The camel carries burdens. Represents: • Obedience • Accepting traditional values • Carrying expectations Think: “I will carry what society tells me.” 🦁 Lion The lion fights against old values and expectations. Represents: • Rebellion • Saying “No” • Rejecting imposed values Think: “I refuse to simply accept what society tells me.” 👶 Child The child represents: • Creativity • New beginnings • Creating new values • Freedom Think: “I can create my own values.” ⭐ Memorize: Camel = obey Lion = rebel Child = create Will to Power The will to power is the drive to: • Grow • Overcome obstacles • Develop oneself • Express strength • Create and achieve It is more complicated than simply wanting political power. Think: “Become stronger and overcome yourself.” Slave Morality vs. Master Morality Slave Morality Values associated with: • Humility • Weakness • Submission • Compassion • Turning the other cheek Nietzsche criticized morality that he believed glorified weakness. Master Morality Values associated with: • Strength • Achievement • Confidence • Excellence • Self-assertion Easy: Slave morality → weakness/submission Master morality → strength/self-assertion Ubermensch Ubermensch = Overman / Higher Human A person who: • Overcomes themselves • Creates their own values • Does not blindly follow society • Strives for excellence Important: Don't think “superhero.” Think: Someone who creates and lives according to higher values rather than blindly following the crowd. ☕ 4. FRANZ KAFKA 5 The Metamorphosis Kafka's famous story about Gregor Samsa, who wakes up transformed into a strange insect-like creature. The story explores themes such as: • Isolation • Alienation • Identity • Meaning • Family • Absurdity Remember: Kafka = Metamorphosis = alienation/absurdity 🧔 5. ALBERT CAMUS 5 Camus is one of the most important existential/absurdist thinkers. The Myth of Sisyphus Sisyphus is condemned to push a huge rock up a hill. Every time he gets near the top: The rock rolls back down. He has to do it again. And again. And again. Why is this important? It represents the human condition: We search for meaning, but life may not give us a clear ultimate meaning. Life is Absurd Camus believed there is a conflict between: Human desire for meaning and A universe that doesn't provide obvious meaning. That's the absurd. Revolt Against Absurdity Camus' response isn't: “Give up.” Instead: Recognize the absurd and continue living anyway. We should live fully even without a guaranteed ultimate meaning. Suicide as a Philosophical Question Camus asks: If life is absurd, is suicide the logical response? His answer is essentially no. Instead, we should confront absurdity and continue living. Need for Clarity Camus values honestly recognizing reality rather than comforting ourselves with false certainty. Need for social warmth and contact Humans still need: • Connection • Friendship • Community • Relationships Even in an absurd world, relationships can make life richer. Remember Camus: Absurdity → don't give up → revolt/live → relationships 🧔‍♂️ 6. JEAN-PAUL SARTRE 6 Sartre is another VERY important philosopher. Existence Precedes Essence This is probably Sartre's most important phrase. Traditional idea: Something has an essence that determines what it is. Sartre flips this for human beings. Humans exist first. Then: We define ourselves through our choices. So: You are not born with a predetermined purpose that completely defines you. You create yourself through your actions. Memory: Existence → choices → essence Condemned to Be Free Sartre believed humans are free. But freedom is difficult because: We are responsible for our choices. You cannot completely escape responsibility by saying: “I had no choice.” Bad Faith Bad faith = lying to yourself about your freedom/responsibility. Example: “I'm just this way. I can't change.” Sartre might say you're denying your freedom. Remember: Bad faith = pretending you aren't free/responsible Authenticity Authenticity = honestly accepting your freedom and responsibility. Instead of: “Everyone else expects me to do this.” You ask: “What do I genuinely choose?” Abandonment Sartre's atheism means there is no God providing a predetermined moral rulebook. Therefore, humans experience abandonment. We are responsible for choosing our values. Atheism Sartre was an atheist existentialist. Without God determining our essence or purpose: We must create meaning through our choices. Fundamental Project Each person has an overall direction or project through which they try to make sense of their life. It represents the way someone chooses to live and define themselves. Remember Sartre: Freedom + responsibility + choices + authenticity 👩 7. SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR 6 Simone de Beauvoir applied existentialist ideas to women's lives and social roles. The Second Sex Her famous book examines the ways women have been treated as the “Other” in society. She challenged the idea that women's roles are simply natural or predetermined. Free to Choose Existentialism emphasizes that people have freedom and responsibility. Beauvoir applies this to women: Women should have the freedom to determine their own lives rather than being restricted by social expectations. Remember: Beauvoir = Existentialism + women + freedom 📚 8. EDMUND HUSSERL 4 Husserl is the major philosopher you need to associate with: PHENOMENOLOGY Phenomenology studies conscious experience. Instead of immediately asking: “What is the object really?” Husserl asks: “How does this object appear in my experience?” Transcendental Phenomenology Husserl wanted to investigate the structures of consciousness that make experience possible. Bracketing This is important. Bracketing = temporarily setting aside assumptions about whether something objectively exists. You're focusing on: Your experience of the thing. Example: Instead of asking: “Does this chair objectively exist?” You ask: “How do I experience this chair?” Phenomenological Reduction You reduce your attention to the experience itself. Think: Set aside assumptions → examine experience → understand consciousness Consciousness For Husserl, consciousness is always consciousness of something. You're conscious of: • A thought • An object • A memory • A sound • A person Remember: Husserl = Phenomenology = consciousness + experience + bracketing 🧔‍♂️ 9. MARTIN HEIDEGGER 5 Heidegger is focused heavily on: BEING His major question: What does it mean to be? Thrown Into the World Humans don't choose: • When they're born • Where they're born • Their family • Their historical situation We are thrown into a world that already exists. Example: You didn't choose: “I want to be born in this country, during this year, into this family.” You simply find yourself already here. Remember: Thrownness = I find myself already in a world I didn't choose. Sinn Sinn = sense / meaning Heidegger is interested in how human beings understand and interpret meaning. Everydayness Most of the time, people simply go through everyday routines: • Wake up • Go to school • Work • Eat • Scroll • Sleep We can become absorbed in everyday life without deeply questioning our existence. Think: Everydayness = ordinary routine life Care Care is central to Heidegger's understanding of human existence. Humans are always concerned with: • Their lives • Other people • Their future • Their responsibilities • What matters to them Simple: Being human means caring about things. Chatter Chatter means the constant talk/opinions circulating around us. It can keep us from genuinely thinking for ourselves. Example: “Everyone says college is supposed to be like this.” “Everyone says success means this.” “Everyone says I should do this.” Heidegger asks whether you're actually thinking for yourself. The Question of Being This is Heidegger's BIG question: What does it mean to be? Not simply: “What things exist?” But: “What is Being itself?” Poetry Heidegger believed poetry can help reveal Being and meaning in ways ordinary everyday language may not. Remember: Heidegger = Being + thrownness + everydayness + care
10
Updated 6d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
ignore this
4
Updated 6d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Igor 1
14
Updated 7d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Igor 21.08
20
Updated 10d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
HJ's (ignore)
10
Updated 14d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Igor 10.08
10
Updated 19d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Igor 28.07
14
Updated 34d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Igor 23.07
10
Updated 39d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Igor 13.07
9
Updated 49d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Igor 6.07
8
Updated 56d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Igor 29.06
7
Updated 62d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Igor 25.06
23
Updated 67d ago
0.0(0)
Users (475)