Chapter 2 - Majoritarian or Pluralist Democracy?
What is democracy?
Democracy can be understood in two main senses: procedural democracy and substantive democracy.
Procedural democracy emphasizes the processes that enable the people to govern (means).
Substantive democracy is about the substance of government policies regarding individual liberty and rights (ends).
Procedural democracy
Procedural democracy establishes principles describing how government should make decisions.
Procedural democracy questions
It addresses 3 questions:
Who should participate in decision-making? – Universal participation
How much should each participant’s vote count? – Political equality
How many votes are needed to reach a decision? – Majority rule
Indirect democracy and representation
In an indirect democracy with elected representatives (a republic) we ask, whose opinions do elected leaders follow in making laws? – The people, which requires the responsiveness of leaders
Procedural vs Substantive: lack of precise criteria in substantive
Substantive democracy does not provide precise criteria to determine whether (or not) government is democratic – How much free speech or freedom of religion is required to be democratic?
Was the U.S. (not) a democracy prior to the civil war?
Was the U.S. (not) a democracy prior to women’s suffrage (right to vote)?
Procedural democracy vs substantive: potential conflict
The procedural viewpoint, while presenting specific criteria for democratic government, may produce policies that oppress minorities (e.g., restrict their rights) thus violating substantive democracy (e.g., free speech).
Procedural democracy produced: historical examples
Constitution treated African-Americans as \frac{3}{5}{ } a person and institutionalized slavery
Procedural democracy produced: Jim Crow
Jim Crow laws throughout the South
Theories of procedural democracy in the United States
Which type of democracy will we mostly study?
We will primarily focus on procedural democracy, but will also cover substantive democracy when we cover civil liberties and civil rights
Majoritarian model
The majoritarian model is the classic theory of democracy in which government by the people is interpreted as government by the majority of the people.
Central to the Majoritarian Model of Democracy
Elections
Political Parties
Centralized government
Theories of Procedural Democracy in the United States, contd. – The pluralist model
The pluralist model is an interpretation of democracy in which government “by the people” happens through competing interest groups.
Important to the Pluralist Model of Democracy
Competition among interest groups
Decentralized government
Limits majority action - allows minorities to rule
Pluralism
Public
Policy
interest groups
NRA
Pluralism
Labor
Sierra Club
corporations
Public
Policy
Does Pluralism produce democratic outcomes?
Madison argues that struggles among diverse ‘factions’ (interests) would represent the policy needs of ordinary citizens.
Others argue that pluralism is biased, leading to public policy that is favorable towards the well organized and wealthy
(Biased) Pluralism
Public
Policy
corporations
Comparing majoritarianism & pluralism
Majoritarian model:
Elections and political parties are key
Centralized structure of government
Enables majorities to rule
Pluralist model:
Interest groups are key
Decentralized structure of government
Limits majority action - allows minorities to rule
Centralized vs. Decentralized Government
Centralized
Decentralized
American government is highly fragmented
Federalism
THE CONSTITUTION
Separation of powers
National government
State governments
Legislative branch
Executive branch
Judicial branch
Bicameral Congress
House of Representatives
Senates
Committees
Committees
Subcommittees
An Undemocratic Model: Elite Theory
Theory that important government decisions made by small group of wealthy people
Control key financial, communications, industrial, and government institutions
Define issues and effect outcomes to serve their interests
According to elite theory, the U.S. is an oligarchy
Extreme version of this are conspiracy theories about secret, powerful organizations, such as the Illuminati or the Freemasons
Divided States of Oligarchy (wealth slide)
Mark Zuckerberg Wealth
2012: $44 billion
2025: $217 billion
Jeff Bezos Wealth
2012: $18 billion
2025: $245 billion
Elon Musk Wealth
2012: $2 billion
2025: $449 billion
Elite theory claims
that a small group of people make most of the important govt. decisions (undemocratic)
What is NOT important to Elite Theory
Elections and voting
Political Parties
Interest groups
The structure of government (centralized or decentralized)
Elite Theory vs. Pluralist Theory
First key difference is the durability of the ruling minority – In elite theory, who is an elite doesn’t change much – In pluralism, no one group always wins; it is always changing
Elite Theory vs. Pluralist Theory (continued)
Second key difference is that pluralist theory involves struggle between interest groups whereas elite theory is relatively consensual (elites agree to do what is in their best interests) – Wealthy groups do not always win in pluralism, but do have an advantage