1/35
Morality, Aggression, & Antisocial Behavior
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Morality
A system of beliefs about right & wrong that guides behavior
Components of Morality
Moral reasoning (thinking)
Moral emotions (feeling)
Moral behavior (doing)
Moral Reasoning in Infants
Even infants show early understanding of fairness, helping, & harm
Fairness Expectations
Infants expect equal distribution of resources by the end of the first year
Premack & Premack Study
Showed infants expect agents to act fairly & to help rather than harm
Conscience
Internal sense of right & wrong that includes rule understanding & emotional discomfort after wrongdoing
Prosocial Behavior
Voluntary behavior intended to benefit others (helping, sharing, comforting)
Warneken & Tomasello (2006)
Toddlers help adults without being asked, showing early natural prosocial behavior
Kohlberg’s Theory of Morality
Moral development unfolds in stages based on how children reason about moral problems
Preconventional Level
Morality based on punishment & reward (typical of young children)
Stage 1 (Punishment Orientation)
“What avoids punishment is right”
Stage 2 (Instrumental Orientation)
“What benefits me is right”
Conventional Level
Morality based on social rules & approval
Stage 3 (Good Boy/Girl)
Behavior is moral if it pleases others
Stage 4 (Law & Order)
Obedience to authority & rules is moral
Postconventional Level
Morality based on abstract ethical principles
Stage 5 (Social Contract)
Laws are flexible & should protect human rights
Stage 6 (Universal Ethics)
Moral decisions based on justice & equality
Heinz Dilemma
A man must decide whether to steal a drug to save his wife’s life
Used to assess moral reasoning
Kohlberg Criticisms
Gender Bias - Emphasizes justice reasoning & undervalues care-based reasoning (Gilligan)
Cultural Bias - Theory favors Western values of individual rights
Antisocial Behavior
Pattern of behavior that violates social norms & the rights of others
Normal Aggression
Peaks in toddlerhood & declines with development
Early-Onset Aggression
Begins in childhood & is most predictive of later antisocial behavior
Social Information Processing (Dodge)
Children move through steps to interpret & respond to social situations
SIP Steps
Encode social cues
Interpret social cues
Clarify goals
Generate possible responses
Choose a response
Enact the behavior
SIP Deficit – Reactive Aggression
Impulsive, emotional response to perceived threat
Caused by hostile attribution bias at interpretation step
SIP Deficit – Proactive Aggression
Deliberate, planned aggression used to achieve a goal
Caused by goal-oriented planning & reward focus
Hostile Attribution Bias
Misinterpreting ambiguous actions as intentionally hostile
Puzzle Study
Aggressive children assume harm is intentional when it is ambiguous
Origins of Antisocial Behavior
Biology (genes)
Harsh parenting
Peers
Violent media
Family Influence on Antisocial Behavior
Harsh discipline
Lack of supervision
Low warmth increase risk
Peer Influence on Antisocial Behavior
Deviant peer groups reinforce aggressive behavior
Media Influence on Aggression
Repeated exposure to violent TV increases aggressive scripts
Huesmann Longitudinal TV Study
Childhood TV violence predicted adult aggression 15 years later
Low SES & Aggression
Higher stress
Fewer resources
Exposure to violence increase antisocial risk
Key Takeaway
Aggression develops through a combination of biology, social learning, and cognitive interpretation