1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Hypothesis for Human Origins:
Multiregional Hypothesis:
Out-of Africa Hypothesis
Multiregional Hypothesis:
Proposed that modern humans evolved independently in multiple regions from Homo ergaster populations that left Africa ~2 million years ago
Connected through minimal gene flow → allowed it to maintain as single species
Therefore, humans from different regions have different ancient roots
Predicts:
Regional populations gradually evolved into modern humans over 2 Ma
Racial differences among humans reflect local adaptations that developed over a very long period of time
REJECTED: Due to the mtDNA test which proved we all evolved from africa
Out-of Africa Hypothesis
Suggests that modern humans evolved in Africa from Homo ergaster descendants (sometimes called Homo heidelbergensis) ~200,000 years ago
Claim: All modern humans came for this african population
Greater genetic diversity in Africa due to a longer evolutionary history
We then migrated out of Africa and replaced other earlier hominins → and evolved different traits slowly
Molecular Evidence: Rebecca Cann’s Mitochondrial DNA Study
Rebecca Cann’s Mitochondrial DNA Study
Background: Compared mtDNA sequences from 147 people around the world
This approach allowed reconstruction of the human family tree
mtDNA Use: Ideal for tracing ancestry and evolutionary relationships
Small (~17,000 base pairs) and circular
Abundant: many copies per cell
Maternally inherited - from the egg; sperm do not contribute mitochondria
Non-recombining,ng
Method:
Collected mtDNA from placentas at birth
Used restriction enzymes to cut the DNA at specific recognition sites → IF a mutation changes the sequences the enzyme does not cut
Formed fragment patters in gel electrophoresis that showed sequence differences
Results:
Deepest Branches: African mtDNA
modern humans originated in Africa, and non-Africans are descendants of a subset of Africans that migrated out
Non african mtDNA had branched from within the african tree
Shallow Tree
Even the most distantly related humans have a recent common ancestor (~200,000 years ago)
Extension studies: Y chromosome that do not recombine - in men
Genetic Drift Effect
Non-recombining
meaning mutations are the only source of variation → clear lineage tracking
Phylogenetic Reconstruction
USed shared derived characters to reconstruct the mtDNA family tree
Mutations that arose in common ancestors that are shared by certain people
Genetic Drift Effect
the random change in the frequency of gene variants in a population over time, leading to reduced genetic variation
Neanderthals
Biological species: If we could interbreed then they were considered the same species as us….
DNA Studies:
mtDNA was extracted from neanderthal bones
No close matches between humans and neanderthals - No interbreeding
Whole Genome Sequencing
Interbreeding did occur between neanderthals and early non-african modern humans
1–2% of the DNA in all non-African humans is of Neanderthal origin
Questions on whether humans killed them or if we just interbreed with them
Denisovans
ANother group of archaic humans - discovered in the caves of siberia
Related to neanderthals and interbreed with some modern human populations
Specifically the australasians → they have denisovan DNA in them
Functional Importance from archaic Genes: Tibetan High-Altitude Adaptions
EPAS1 gene - helps regulate oxyygen metabolism at low O2 levels
The Tibetan allele is similar to Denisovan EPAS1, suggesting introgression
Introgression
the transfer of genetic information from one species to another as a result of hybridization between them and repeated backcrossing