L1: What is rational choice

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

What is Rational Choice?

Is not just one theory, it is basically a whole set of theories surrounding a few basic (but very controversial) assumptions

Aka a lens

2
New cards

Rational choice consensus?

NO consensus

The debate about the limitations of this theory is often not friendly → hate

3
New cards

Rational choice theory

refers to the school of thought that thinks about how any individual is most likely to make decisions

  • it claims to be able to explain how all decisions are made across all individuals

  • It is a framework of analyzing decisions

4
New cards

RC: deductive reasoning

  • Always starts with certain assumptions —> start with set of prior assumptions

    • What people/groups want 

  • Make general models based on these common assumptions

  • Models very clear before starting

    • Ex. Political parties want to be in parliament

  • With models we predict individual and group behavior

5
New cards

are the models used in RC realistic?

  • Not all models fit reality

    • Not everyone thinks the same way

      • Ex. Not all politicians are after the same thing

6
New cards

Models with real life information

  • Models are based on these a priori assumptions

  • They are abstractions (or simplifications) of the political world

  • We test the implications of these rational choice models with real life information

    • If assumptions don’t match up with reality, the model is wrong and needs to be modified

7
New cards

PolSci History: end of WW2

  • Thick descriptions

    • Summary of how institutions worked plus focus on their historical development

  • Normative component: many judgement were made about how they worked

    • Judgements were not really motivated

      • Why do things work/happen the way they are

  • PolSci was descriptive and judgmental (“how questions”) rather than analytical (the "why" question)

8
New cards

PolSci history: 50s - 70s

  • Behavioralism

    • Can we move towards a more 'objective' approach?

    • It emphasized an objective, quantified approach to explain and predict political behavior - the 'why' questions

  • Started to systematically collect information and find empirical regularities (inductive reasoning)

  • The start of 'logical positivism'

    • Logical positivism = Measure something through data collection

      • Patterns, why? 

    • Economic imperialism

9
New cards

PolSci History: 70s - 1994

the take-off growth

  • The combination of economic models and PolSci lead to RC

  • RC became attractive to many scholars from different fields

  • Many books & journal articles, journals were written

    • Around 90s: more than 40% of the articles published in APSR based on RC

    • Now? 80%

      • Have some ideas of RC in them —> not all are explicitly RC

10
New cards

PolSci history: 70s - 1994 problem started

  • One important finding: RC scholars showed that state intervention in the market could expect to fail

  • This in contrast to many economist findings that were in favor for state intervention to balance out market failure

  • RC scholars were often used by neo-liberal (right) politicians

  • Created a lot of hostilities between RC scholars and other political scientists!

11
New cards

PolSci history: 1994-2004

Difficulties arise — blew up in 1994 with Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory book

  • Their main claim was that RCT has not yielded empirically useful results

  • Criticism: can’t predict everyone’s behavior —> reality is more complicated

  • Attacked RC in every way possible

12
New cards

Pathologies

  • uproar with book was connected to its confrontational tone more than its substance

  • The reaction of rational choice scholars was to get hostile and mean back

  • Empiricism ≠ RC ≠ formal mathematical modeling

  • Scholars started to change their models to better fit reality

13
New cards

RC in current scholarship

  • RC has not swallowed PolSci as a whole but it has definitely not disappeared

  • It still shapes the PolSci research agenda

    • Especially in US

  • RC also worked on a better defense against criticisms

    • RC responded initially with several papers, journals, articles that attacked Green and Shapiro

    • It has become more empirical, interdisciplinary

    • Some have even argued that RC has softened its assumptions

14
New cards

RC is often confused with what?

Logical positivism/empiricism

Mathematical logic

15
New cards

Two types of rational choice models

  • soft

  • Hard