L1: What is rational choice

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

What is Rational Choice?

Is not just one theory, it is basically a whole set of theories surrounding a few basic (but very controversial) assumptions

Aka a lens

2
New cards

Rational choice consensus?

NO consensus

The debate about the limitations of this theory is often not friendly → hate

3
New cards

Rational choice theory

refers to the school of thought that thinks about how any individual is most likely to make decisions

  • it claims to be able to explain how all decisions are made across all individuals

  • It is a framework of analyzing decisions

4
New cards

RC: deductive reasoning

  • Always starts with certain assumptions —> start with set of prior assumptions

    • What people/groups want 

  • Make general models based on these common assumptions

  • Models very clear before starting

    • Ex. Political parties want to be in parliament

  • With models we predict individual and group behavior

5
New cards

are the models used in RC realistic?

  • Not all models fit reality

    • Not everyone thinks the same way

      • Ex. Not all politicians are after the same thing

6
New cards

Models with real life information

  • Models are based on these a priori assumptions

  • They are abstractions (or simplifications) of the political world

  • We test the implications of these rational choice models with real life information

    • If assumptions don’t match up with reality, the model is wrong and needs to be modified

7
New cards

PolSci History: end of WW2

  • Thick descriptions

    • Summary of how institutions worked plus focus on their historical development

  • Normative component: many judgement were made about how they worked

    • Judgements were not really motivated

      • Why do things work/happen the way they are

  • PolSci was descriptive and judgmental (“how questions”) rather than analytical (the "why" question)

8
New cards

PolSci history: 50s - 70s

  • Behavioralism

    • Can we move towards a more 'objective' approach?

    • It emphasized an objective, quantified approach to explain and predict political behavior - the 'why' questions

  • Started to systematically collect information and find empirical regularities (inductive reasoning)

  • The start of 'logical positivism'

    • Logical positivism = Measure something through data collection

      • Patterns, why? 

    • Economic imperialism

9
New cards

PolSci History: 70s - 1994

the take-off growth

  • The combination of economic models and PolSci lead to RC

  • RC became attractive to many scholars from different fields

  • Many books & journal articles, journals were written

    • Around 90s: more than 40% of the articles published in APSR based on RC

    • Now? 80%

      • Have some ideas of RC in them —> not all are explicitly RC

10
New cards

PolSci history: 70s - 1994 problem started

  • One important finding: RC scholars showed that state intervention in the market could expect to fail

  • This in contrast to many economist findings that were in favor for state intervention to balance out market failure

  • RC scholars were often used by neo-liberal (right) politicians

  • Created a lot of hostilities between RC scholars and other political scientists!

11
New cards

PolSci history: 1994-2004

Difficulties arise — blew up in 1994 with Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory book

  • Their main claim was that RCT has not yielded empirically useful results

  • Criticism: can’t predict everyone’s behavior —> reality is more complicated

  • Attacked RC in every way possible

12
New cards

Pathologies

  • uproar with book was connected to its confrontational tone more than its substance

  • The reaction of rational choice scholars was to get hostile and mean back

  • Empiricism ≠ RC ≠ formal mathematical modeling

  • Scholars started to change their models to better fit reality

13
New cards

RC in current scholarship

  • RC has not swallowed PolSci as a whole but it has definitely not disappeared

  • It still shapes the PolSci research agenda

    • Especially in US

  • RC also worked on a better defense against criticisms

    • RC responded initially with several papers, journals, articles that attacked Green and Shapiro

    • It has become more empirical, interdisciplinary

    • Some have even argued that RC has softened its assumptions

14
New cards

RC is often confused with what?

Logical positivism/empiricism

Mathematical logic

15
New cards

Two types of rational choice models

  • soft

  • Hard