Phil 25 Chapter 3

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

What is a Formal Fallacy? How many types are there? 

formal fallacies are ONLY invalid deductive arguments; there are 3 types: 

  • Invalid Categorical Syllogism 

  • Invalid Disjunctive Syllogism 

  • Invalid Hypothetical Syllogism 

2
New cards

What are Informal Fallacies? What are the 3 subgroups?

Informal Fallacies are weak inductive arguments. The three subgroups are as follows:

  • Fallacies of Relevance

  • Fallacies of Weak Induction

  • Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Illicit Transference

3
New cards

When do Fallacies of Relevance occur? What are the types? 

Fallacies of Relevance are a subgroup of informal fallacies & are therefore weak inductive arguments. Specifically, these occur when the premises are logically irrelevant to the conclusion. There are 8 types: 

  1. Appeal to Force

  2. Appeal to Pity

  3. *Appeal to the People (vanity, snobbery, tradition, fear, bandwagon)

  4. Fallacy of Accident 

  5. *Ad hominem (abusive, tu quoque, circumstantial)

  6. Straw Man

  7. Red Herring

  8. Missing the Point

Acronym: Four Pitiful Pidgins* Accidentally Attacked* the Small Rubber Mouse

4
New cards

When do Fallacies of Weak Induction occur? What are the types? 

Fallacies of Weak Induction are a subgroup of Informal Fallacies. They occur when the connection between the premises and the conclusion is weak, even though the premises might be relevant. There are 6 types:

  1. Appeal to Unqualified Authority 

  2. Appeal to Ignorance 

  3. Hasty Generalization

  4. *False Cause (post hoc ego propter hoc, non causa pro causa, oversimplified cause, Gambler’s fallacy)

  5. Slippery Slope

  6. Weak Analogy 

5
New cards

When do Fallacies of Presumption occur? What are the types? 

Fallacies of Presumption are a subgroup of informal fallacies. They occur when they assume something that hasn’t been proven. There are 4 types:

  1. Begging the Question (aka Petitio Principii): the argument assumes what it is trying to prove, leaves out a key premise, or uses circular reasoning

  2. False Dichotomy: the argument presents only two options when more actually exist

  3. Complex Question: “loaded question”; the question is phrased such that it presupposes something that is unproven or traps the respondent into admitting something

  4. Suppressed Evidence (will not be tested, ignore)

6
New cards

When do Fallacies of Ambiguity occur? What are the types? 

Fallacies of Ambiguity are a subgroup of informal fallacies. They occur when an argument’s wording or grammar causes unclear or shifting meanings, leading to confusion or false reasoning. There are 2 types:

  1. Equivocation: when a single word or phrase is used in two or more different senses within an argument

  1. Amphiboly: when ambiguous grammar or sentence structure makes a statement open to multiple interpretations

7
New cards

When do Fallacies of Illicit Transference occur? What are the types?

Fallacies of Illicit Transference are a subgroup of informal fallacies. They occur when an attribute is wrongly transferred from the parts to the whole (or vice versa). There are 2 types:

  1. Composition: attribute from parts is wrongly applied to the whole (parts —> whole)

  2. Division: attribute from whole is wrongly applied to parts (whole —> parts)

8
New cards

What are the variations of Appeal to the People?

  • Tradition

  • Snobbery

  • Vanity

  • Fear

  • Bandwagon

Acronym: Traditional Snobs Vote For Blue

9
New cards

What are the variations of Ad Hominem?

  • Circumstantial: tries to discredit someone’s argument by pointing to their circumstances, bias, or motives

  • Tu quoque: tries to undermine an argument by claiming the opponent is hypocritical; argue that they dont practice what they preach

  • Abusive: directly attacks the opponent’s character or traits instead of their argument

10
New cards

What are the variations of False Cause? 

  • Oversimplified cause: Claims a single cause for an event that actually has many contributing factors 

  • Post hoc ego propter hoc: Assumes that because one event happened before another, it caused it

  • Non causa pro causa: happens whenever someone mistakenly identifies a cause that really isn’t connected to the effect at all

  • Gambler’s fallacy: a misunderstanding of probability and independence; assumes random independent events are causally related 

Acronym: Old People Never Gamble