1/120
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Harlow, 1958
infant love - mother (cloth vs wire w/ monkeys)
preference for cloth mother - haven when scared/unsure
mother-infant bond = security not feeding
Attachment
an enduring emotional bond with another person
seek comfort/security when distressed/uncertain
evolutionarily-based tendency for infants to bond with a primary caregiver
ensures survival (broadly)
John Bowlby, Mary Ainsworth
John Bowlby
role of attachment in early development
infant attachment to a primary caregiver → evolutionarily adaptive
attachment figure - secure base (ensures survival)
Mary Ainsworth
individual differences in attachment
parenting behavior (sensitivity/responsiveness) predicts attachment security
insecurity - tied to internal working models of self/others/relationships (IWMs)
attachment styles reflect patterns of (in)security
IWM
internal working model
mental models of close relationships and/or what to expect from relationship partners
Strange Situation - Ainsworth & Bell, 1970
7 segments - separations + reunions w/ child, primary caregiver, +- stranger
observe child
secure-base behavior
reactions to parent leaving
reactions to stranger
reunion behavior *** weighed most
Secure
Caregiver
consistently responsive
consistently sensitive
appropriate to child’s needs
IWM = positive, secure
Infant - Strange Situation
parent = secure base
upset during separation
seeks contact, calms down (positive affect) during reunion
Insecure/Avoidant
Caregiver
consistently unresponsive
consistently insensitive/inappropriate to child’s needs
IWM = negative, avoidant
Infant - Strange Situation
explores freely
stranger & parent treated similarly
unreactive during separation/reunion - “masking” possible
Insecure/ambivalent
Caregiver
inconsistently responsive
inconsistently sensitive/appropriate to child’s needs
IWM = negative, anxious
Infant - Strange Situation
clingy
upset during separation
not easily soothed during reunion
seek & resist parent contact
Attachment Styles
attachment security differs across infants and may influence social and emotional development
secure
insecure/avoidant
insecure/ambivalent
insecure/disorganized - not well defined
Parenting Styles
conceptualized as varying along dimensions of warmth/responsiveness and control/demandingness
contributes to social and emotional development
Features - Baumrind, 1967, 1971, Maccoby & Martin, 1983
Warmth/Responsiveness
sensitivity, responsiveness, positivity, acceptance, involvement, patience
emotional connection
Control/Demandingness
demands, rules, expectations, supervision, feedback
promotes maturity & alignment with social standards
Four Styles
Authoritarian
Authoritative
Disengaged
Permissive
Authoritarian Parenting Style
low warmth, high control
heavy control over child behavior
desire for authority
lower displays of positivity and affection
Authoritative
high warmth, high control
clear and reasonable expectations
consistent feedback
warmth and sensitivity to child’s needs
most beneficial **** w/ sociocultural variations
Disengaged
low warmth, low control
low involvement in terms of supervision and responsiveness to child’s needs
less studied
Permissive
high warmth, low control
high responsiveness to child
weak/inconsistent enforcement of rules and expectations
Adolescence
growth in autonomy and self-regulation
bigger role of peer relationships
risk-taking, sensation-seeking
growth in EF skills, moral reasoning, self-identity
Emerging Adulthood
Arnett, 2000; 2004
“in between” period (18-25)
delay in typical adult milestones (compared to older gens)
Young & Middle Adulthood
less focus in developmental frameworks
Major Areas:
Relationships (parenting/family)
close/romantic relationships & adult attachment
Work-Life Balance
spillover b/w work and personal life
social clock
embodying a “sandwich generation”
feeling productive - Erikson, 1963
Older Adulthood
interest in gerontology + aging research
socioemotional selectivity theory
Socioemotional Selectivity Theory
Carstensen, 1992
more selective with their socioemotional and psychological resources
focus on the present instead of planning for the future
predict biases favoring positive information
Person Perception
how we perceive ourselves and others
Attitude
evaluative orientation toward a particular target
has associated emotions, cognitions, and motivations
self-esteem
Self-Esteem
attitudes about oneself
Attribution
explanation about the causes of behavior
Stereotype
mental representation (schema) about a social group
reasons for forming and relying on stereotypes
social learning & reinforcement
inherent motivations → perceived competition, us vs them, self-esteem/dominance
fewer cognitive resources required
using heuristics (rules) in social perception V. processing individual qualities
Person Bias
Fundamental Attribution Error
attribute others’ behavior to internal (V. situational) factors
Self-Serving Attributional Bias
attribute own success to internal factors
attribute own failure to situational factors
Types of Bias
have important social, financial, legal, and other consequences
person bias - fundamental attribution error
self-serving attributional bias
baby-face bias
attractiveness bias
Prejudice
negative attitude about group (or members of group)
Discrimination
differential treatment due to group membership
Explicit Bias
consciously held beliefs
within one’s awareness
can be stated (even if kept private)
e.g. Modern Racism Scale
Implicit Bias
automatic
operate below conscious awareness
captured with subtle measures - Implicit Association Test
Implicit Association Test
participant will have a shorter reaction time (RT) when the task pairs concepts with a stronger association in their implicit memory
Cognitive Dissonance
discomfort from a sense of conflict b/w one’s beliefs/values/attitudes & one’s actual behavior
motivates a desire to resolve/avoid such conflict
change attitudes, match beliefs, reevaluate new info, justify previous behavior
Social Influence
psychological forces (real or imagined) placed onto us by other people
social situations influence our behavior, typically described as:
(subtle) conformity ←→ compliance ←→ obedience (overt)
conformity → presence of others
group size, unanimity, expertise/status, ambiguity
compliance → request from others
reciprocity, liking/friendship, commitment/consistency, social proof, authority
obedience → command from authority figure(s)
legitimacy of authority, extent of responsibility, impact of actions, proximity, models
Conformity
change in behavior → mimic behavior/preferences of other people in one’s enviro
from real/imagined group pressure
influences leading to conformity:
informational influence
normative influence
related findings/concepts:
bystander effect
Information Influence
pressure to be correct or accurately understand the world
Normative Influence
pressure to maintain social approval
Bystander Effect
lower likelihood of intervening in a situation in the presence of others vs alone
e.g. pluralistic ignorance, diffusion of responsibility
Compliance
change in behavior → response to a request
Techniques (promote compliance)
foot-in-the-door
door in the face
bait-and-switch
low ball
labeling
Foot-In-The-Door
make a small request, then add a larger request
Door-In-The-Face
make a very large (unreasonable) request → make a smaller (more reasonable) request
Bait-And-Switch
offer an attractive option → switch to a less-attractive option
Low Ball
offer attractive option → increase terms of that option
Labeling
label person as someone who would comply with request
Obedience
change in behavior → direct commands from an authority figure
Milgram’s 1963 obedience experiments
Autonomy
respect and protect the personal needs and rights of people who participate in research, including those in vulnerable populations
Beneficence
minimize risks to participants relative to the benefits of research
may include direct benefits to participants or benefits to society c/o this knowledge
Justice
distribute risks and benefits equally across different populations of people
Integrity
promote truth and honesty in all aspects of research
Informed Consent
Provide participants with information about:
study’s purpose
study procedures
right to decline any procedures
right to terminate study participation
right to confidentiality deception that takes place
risks and benefits of participation + compensation
& obtain consent to participate from all participants
Ethical Data Collection
determinations about ethical concerns may not always be straightforward
researchers must adhere to certain ethical principles and relevant ethical considerations when conducting research
many safeguards in place to promote ethical research conduct - researchers must still hold themselves accountable
limit deception unless absolutely necessary to achieve goals of the study
debrief participants about any deception that takes place
lack of coercion/pressure to participate in research
ensures people choose/continue to participate voluntarily (not due to any sense of coercion) → limit social pressure, monetary compensation
anonymity & confidentiality
keep data confidential and not accessible to anyone w/o permission to access
keep personal/identifiable info separate from data (e.g. ID#s not names)
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
reviews all aspects of human subjects research studies → judge risks/benefits, confidentiality & any other ethical concerns in any research study
US → all projects w/ human participants requires IRB approval before data collection
most universities have their own IRB
Sharing Research Findings
integrity → required accuracy when collecting/analyzing data, even when results do not match hypotheses
offenses - fabricating data/results; plagiarism of others/own work
Morally Gray Practices: (from pressure to publish in academia)
HARKing
p hacking
underreporting non-significant results
false positives(?)
“replication crisis”
conflict of interest
Mitigation of Issues:
disclosing funding sources & conflicts of interest
team science w/ active collaboration/accountability
study preregistration - log hypothesis/analysis plan before data collection
open data - sharing data/code publicly for evaluation
open materials - sharing study materials publicly for evaluation/replication
encouragement to replicate findings or meta-analysis before conclusions can be made
HARKing
hypothesizing after results are known
skip to analyzing data; explain pattern of results after
p hacking
making selective choices with data/analysis that encourage significant results
underreporting non-significant results
null findings may never be publicized
false positives (?)
over-emphasizing significant results found in just one sample
may not replicate/exist in population
“replication crisis”
prioritizing novel findings
discouraging replication of past work
conflict of interest
holding a financial/meaningful stake in the findings of one’s own research
Personality
relatively consistent patterns of thought, feeling/emotion, and behavior
evident across different situations for a given person
may lead people to respond differently to the same situation
major aspect of individual differences in psychology
Trait Approaches
emphasize individual differences in specific, reliable personality traits and dimensions
Big 5 Personality Traits (Rammstedt & John, 2007)
Openness to Experience
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Neuroticism
Openness to Experience
tendency to pursue and be comfortable with novelty/variety
display fluid/creative thought/curiosity/imagination
Conscientiousness
tendency to successfully control one’s behavior to meet goals
to be organized, careful, responsible, etc
Extraversion
tendency to pursue and enjoy interpersonal interactions
to be outgoing/assertive with other people
to be energetic, optimistic, etc.
Agreeableness
tendency to regard others with warmth/sympathy/concern
to bee good-natured, trusting, helpful, etc.
Neuroticism
tendency to experience distressing emotions and thoughts
NOT emotionally stable/calm/secure
Psychodynamic Approaches
Freud’s Psychoanalysis
individual differences in behavior → due to competing mental forces (id, ego, superego)
threatening motives → display of defense mechanisms
repression, denial, projection, displacement
id (Freud)
one’s unconscious motives for pleasure
ego (Freud)
conscious awareness of reality
superego
desire to meet social standards
Humanistic Approaches
emphasize individual differences in the conscious experience of the self, motivations, and beliefs
clinical approach → self-actualization (becoming one’s full self)
fulfilling true potential, achieving sense of autonomy, accepting oneself + others
Pyramid: self-actualization (growth need) → esteem needs → belongings and love needs → safety needs → physiological needs (deficiency needs)
progress → predicted increase in well-being
Self-Determination Theory
Self-Determination Theory
individual differences in well-being and success reflect one’s sense of autonomy, competence, and relatedness
Autonomy → Self-Determination
sense that our behavior is motivated from within
Competence → Self-Determination
opportunity to demonstrate our strengths
Relatedness → Self-Determination
opportunity to feel affiliated with others
Motivational Approaches
emphasize individual differences in motivation orientation
approach/avoidance tendencies
BIS-BAS
Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS)
Behavioral Activation System (BAS)
vary in tendency to be motivated by either system (work independently)
Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS)
underlies sensitivity to threat or punishment and avoidance behavior
Behavioral Activation System (BAS)
underlies sensitivity to reward or excitement and approach behavior
Social-Cognitive Approach
emphasize individual differences in beliefs about one’s self and about the word
conscious or unconscious
E.g.:
internal v. external locus of control
self-efficacy and outcome efficacy
performance V. mastery orientation
fixed V. malleable traits
Perspective Approaches
individual differences are thought to reflect:
trait approaches
psychodynamic approaches
humanistic approaches
motivational approaches
Psychopathology
pathology/disorder of a psychological nature (related to one’s thoughts/behavior/emotions)
characterized by deviance, distress, dysfunction/disability, danger
characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual’s cognition, emotion regular, or behavior
reflects dysfunction in psychological, biological, or developmental processes of mental functioning
associated with significant distress/disability (social/occupational/etc)
subjective and/or tied to many factors
NOT mental disorder:
expectable or culturally approved response to common stressor/loss
socially deviant behavior and self V society conflicts (unless resulting from a dysfunction)
Causes:
predisposition → "diathesis-stress” patterns
precipitation
perpetuation
Factors
cultural/societal norms/supports
identity and demographic characteristics
clinician knowledge/expertise/expectations
deviance
atypicality of thoughts or behavior → not expectable or culturally approved
distress
negative thoughts/emotions
dysfunction/disability
difficulty leading a typical life
danger
risk or harm to self/others
Predisposition (Predisposing Cause)
precedes onset
increases risk for disorder
Precipitation (precipitating cause)
acute/immediate trigger for onset of disorder
Perpetuation (perpetuating cause)
consequences of disorder that keep it going
“Diathesis-Stress” Patterns
predisposition (diathesis) leads to disorder for those exposed to less-ideal environments (stress)
dual-risk patterns → high predisposition + high stress = high chance of manifesting disorder
diathesis + stress = development of the disorder
Diathesis (D-S Pattern)
a predisposition or vulnerability
inherited predisposition to develop the disorder
Stress (D-S Pattern)
environmental stressors
prenatal trauma
childhood sexual/physical abuse
family conflict
significant life changes
Development of Disorder (D-S Pattern)
stronger the diatheses → less stress necessary to produce disorder
psychological disorder
Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
5th edition text revision
Criteria developed and updated by the American Psychiatric Association
dictates diagnoses - issues with reliability and validity of diagnosis are important to consider
Anxiety Disorders
generalized anxiety disorder
phobias
social anxiety disorder
panic disorder
agoraphobia
obsessive-compulsive disorder
Trauma & Stressor-Related Disorders
post-traumatic stress disorder
acute stress disorder
Mood Disorders
depression
major depressive disorder
persistent depressive disorder
bipolar disorder (I & II)
Psychological Disorders
there are hundred of diagnosable psychological disorders, some more common than others, each with their own typical criteria
many thought to emerge through both biological vulnerability and stressful experiences → conceptualized through diathesis-stress patterns
many factors influence perceptions of mental illness
labels have both problematic and beneficial outcomes
Examples
autism spectrum disorder
attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
schizophrenia
dissociative identity disorder
personality disorders
Autism Spectrum Disorder
deficits in social communication and social interaction
restricted or repetitive patterns of behavior or interest
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
hyperactivity
impulsivity
poor behavioral control
difficulty shifting or focusing attention