1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
George Berkeley
2nd of the Great British Empiricists
18th century thinker
Archbishop
Subjective Idealism
Central Claim of Berkeley’s empiricism:
“ To be is to perceive or to be perceived”
Meaning; All that exists is minds and that which is perceived within minds
Surprising implication
Mind independent material substance does not exist
What exist is our perception of a certain color, texture, smell,sound, but there is nothing beyond that
Berkeley vs Locke
Berkeley reject the existence of lockean primary qualities of object
Locke’s insight: any argument for the existence of mind independent material substance must be based on non-empirical premises, therefore the empirical out to reject belief in substance
Dialogue format
Philonous – Mouthpiece of Berkeley
• Hylas – Common sense thinker
• Topic – Does subjective idealism entail
skepticism or atheism?
• Q: Why would SI be viewed as skepticism?
Skepticism versus subjective idea
skeptic: one that doubts of everything
Subjective idealism: doubts, material substance, but believes that doubting substance establishes the knowledge of Great many other things
Subjective idea, views, traditional empiricism as skepticism
locke’s common sense view of cognition, puts distance between the real external objects and ideas in one's mind
The traditional story let since data and organs put distance between perceiver and perceived that found skepticism. Ideas can't be like external objects.
Explanation of matter
Subjective idealism: says that matter is merely the perception of touch, there is nothing further
B/C of God
archbishop berkeley think that the entire external world is constantly perceived by God. Therefore, it acts with regularity and acts according to a higher order of law than our own perceptions
Why would anyone accept subjective idealism?
Subjective idea: all that exist, our minds, and that which is perceived in minds
Simplicity: the traditional account of empiricism is more metaphysically complex
Explanatory power
Justification of knowledge: the existence of the objects of subjectivism: minds in ideas in mind. The existence of anything mine independent is very difficult to justify.
Avoidance of skepticism
fits well into a monotheistic or pantheistic world view
Against subjective idealism
The experiment does prove that some qualities of objects like experiencing them as hot and cold or mind dependent, but does not prove that every quality is mind dependent
Most of us experienced the world as mine independent it does not disappear radically reconfigure when we all stop pereceiving it