4.2: factors determining industrial location
North America and Europe have become less dominant in the world of industry as Asia and other regions have seen growth
China’s manufacturing has moved inland, Europe’s has moved East, and the United States' has moved between states
usually correlated with market forces and factors of production
factors of production: land, labor, and capital
physical space, natural resources, capital machinery and facilities, the number of workers available, and the skill level of those workers are all major deciding components in the production and transportation of goods
this relates to site and situation
site: local characteristics of a place
situation: relative location and characteristics of a place
eg. a factory would likely need access to a large workforce with a high school education (site) and proximity to raw materials like iron and coal (situation) to be profitable
the importance of these characteristics varies based on what is being produced
eg. low-cost energy for petrochemical manufacturing, lots of low-skill workers for textile production
essentially, look for places that will hold a manufacturing advantage over other places
early industrial location theory
main theorist Alfred Weber suggested that transportation is the most important factor in production based on location of consumers and raw materials
he studied transportation, labor, and agglomeration in relation to manufacturing
eg. US industrial heartland originated near Appalachia, where coal was readily available as an energy source
labor is also important
the cost of labor is dependent on:
the strength of the local economy
the supply of available workers
the skill and efficiency of available workers
local labor laws
unionization legality and norms
and other factors
1800s-1900s: manufacturing in the US and Europe was largely fueled by lots of cheap labor with low regulation and unionization
agglomeration is important as well
agglomeration: a localized economy in which a large number of companies and industries cluster together and benefit from the cost reductions and gains in efficiency that result from this proximity
“industrial manufacturers benefit by clustering in the same location”
small factories can merge into bigger entities and efficiencies via economy of scale
specialty suppliers can help manufacturers more easily/efficiently
experienced workforce in clusters (decreases cost of training new workers)
shared infrastructure of industrial agglomeration (developing roads, water, electricity, etc.)
this benefits all firms in the area
agglomeration has a size limit
levels of concentration can become too high to a point where deglomerative forces become present
deglomerative forces eg. high rent, congestion (disadvantageous for transportation), wage increases
contemporary industrial location
Weber aimed to explain how site impacts the location of manufacturers; since his time, however, some of these factors have changed in importance
eg. considering shifts in economic and political environments
mainly, relative distance has decreased, changing transportation’s effect and influence
this means many manufacturers just go wherever has the greatest return on investment
government policy has also played an increasingly important role (eg. trade agreements)
cost of labor is also decided by individual governments, as well as the formation of industrial agglomeration, in some cases
policies such as environmental regulations and taxes must also be considered
outsourcing: when a corporate entity does not own its production facilities, but contracts with other companies to produce components or assemble products
referred to as offshoring if done in countries other than the home country of the corporate entity
the role of transportation
less important than it has been historically
road and air transportation costs have significantly decreased in recent years (namely the latter part of the 20th century)
ocean transportation prices haven’t decreased much, but since technology has improved, trips can be done in shorter periods of time, and cost declines as a result of that
invention of the shipping container also helps this effect
since transportation is easier, faster, and cheaper, corporations can simply build production facilities wherever is most profitable for them
the role of government policy
growing awareness surrounding worker and environmental exploitation led to greater governmental regulation (wages, safety, benefit for workers)
tax rates, trade investments, etc. also weigh in
trade
inputs (raw materials) + manufactured components → industrial production → outputs (goods for sale to consumers)
inputs and consumers are often found globally, so trade affects distribution when locating facilities
many European countries encourage free trade (quick and cheap transportation of goods, no tariffs, import quotas, other restrictions)
easy to import and export goods
relatively open trade policies in countries such as South Korea, Singapore, and Japan (East Asia)
highly restrictive trade policies in countries such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Iraq (Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East)
worse for industrial production due to slow and expensive customs and procedures
labor
government regulations on labor must be taken into consideration as well
labor flexibility — flexible labor markets = limited regulation on minimum wages, mandated taxes, worker benefits, and job security
eg. US has a low federal minimum wage, no government-mandated health or vacation requirements, “at will” employment policies (easy to hire/fire)
other labor flexible places include Singapore, Denmark, Uganda, and Somalia (dispersed geographically and developmentally)
American labor laws can vary by place, minimum wage is very different in different parts of the country
taxes
tax burden must also be considered
lowest tax burdens are mainly in Middle Eastern oil states, “tax havens” eg. Liechtenstein (Europe) and the Bahamas (Caribbean)
overall business environment
subjective and highly dependent on which factors are valued; the World Bank ranks business friendliness based on the following factors:
costs and time associated with obtaining permits to start a business
obtaining construction permits
getting electrical rigs
obtaining financing
paying taxes
importing/exporting goods
legal protections for investors and contract enforcement
the Heritage Foundation takes different factors into consideration when determining business friendliness:
size of government (tax burden)
rule of law
overall regulatory environment (labor laws)
openness of markets to investment and trade
different criteria used by the two sources, but heavy overlap between rankings
thirteen of the top twenty are the same in each list (eg. Hong Kong, the US, UK, many Eastern European Countries, Denmark, Sweden)
worst overlap too (difficult to invest privately, start industry)
most highly-ranking countries have high standards of living while those who do not are often less-developed countries
economic growth leads to higher tax revenue which increases the average standard of living within a country
best regulatory environments
country (listed alphabetically) | World Bank Ranking | Heritage Foundation Ranking |
---|---|---|
Australia | 15 | 5 |
Denmark | 3 | 18 |
Estonia | 12 | 6 |
Hong Kong Sar, China | 4 | 1 |
Ireland | 18 | 9 |
Latvia | 14 | 20 |
New Zealand | 1 | 3 |
Singapore | 2 | 2 |
Sweden | 9 | 19 |
Taiwan, China | 11 | 11 |
United Kingdom | 7 | 12 |
United States | 8 | 17 |
worst regulatory environments (alphabetically)
Afghanistan
Angola
Chad
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Liberia
Timor-Leste
Venezuela
government incentives
generalized regulations
business incentives
eg. tax breaks, subsidized land, liberalized labor/import laws, modern and reliable infrastructure
strategy and end goal: subsidize industrial development until special incentives are no longer needed
the role of labor
dependent on the type of manufacturing being performed
skilled labor usually entails technical certification, and higher educational degrees
automation decreases the need for less-skilled workers
North America and Europe have become less dominant in the world of industry as Asia and other regions have seen growth
China’s manufacturing has moved inland, Europe’s has moved East, and the United States' has moved between states
usually correlated with market forces and factors of production
factors of production: land, labor, and capital
physical space, natural resources, capital machinery and facilities, the number of workers available, and the skill level of those workers are all major deciding components in the production and transportation of goods
this relates to site and situation
site: local characteristics of a place
situation: relative location and characteristics of a place
eg. a factory would likely need access to a large workforce with a high school education (site) and proximity to raw materials like iron and coal (situation) to be profitable
the importance of these characteristics varies based on what is being produced
eg. low-cost energy for petrochemical manufacturing, lots of low-skill workers for textile production
essentially, look for places that will hold a manufacturing advantage over other places
early industrial location theory
main theorist Alfred Weber suggested that transportation is the most important factor in production based on location of consumers and raw materials
he studied transportation, labor, and agglomeration in relation to manufacturing
eg. US industrial heartland originated near Appalachia, where coal was readily available as an energy source
labor is also important
the cost of labor is dependent on:
the strength of the local economy
the supply of available workers
the skill and efficiency of available workers
local labor laws
unionization legality and norms
and other factors
1800s-1900s: manufacturing in the US and Europe was largely fueled by lots of cheap labor with low regulation and unionization
agglomeration is important as well
agglomeration: a localized economy in which a large number of companies and industries cluster together and benefit from the cost reductions and gains in efficiency that result from this proximity
“industrial manufacturers benefit by clustering in the same location”
small factories can merge into bigger entities and efficiencies via economy of scale
specialty suppliers can help manufacturers more easily/efficiently
experienced workforce in clusters (decreases cost of training new workers)
shared infrastructure of industrial agglomeration (developing roads, water, electricity, etc.)
this benefits all firms in the area
agglomeration has a size limit
levels of concentration can become too high to a point where deglomerative forces become present
deglomerative forces eg. high rent, congestion (disadvantageous for transportation), wage increases
contemporary industrial location
Weber aimed to explain how site impacts the location of manufacturers; since his time, however, some of these factors have changed in importance
eg. considering shifts in economic and political environments
mainly, relative distance has decreased, changing transportation’s effect and influence
this means many manufacturers just go wherever has the greatest return on investment
government policy has also played an increasingly important role (eg. trade agreements)
cost of labor is also decided by individual governments, as well as the formation of industrial agglomeration, in some cases
policies such as environmental regulations and taxes must also be considered
outsourcing: when a corporate entity does not own its production facilities, but contracts with other companies to produce components or assemble products
referred to as offshoring if done in countries other than the home country of the corporate entity
the role of transportation
less important than it has been historically
road and air transportation costs have significantly decreased in recent years (namely the latter part of the 20th century)
ocean transportation prices haven’t decreased much, but since technology has improved, trips can be done in shorter periods of time, and cost declines as a result of that
invention of the shipping container also helps this effect
since transportation is easier, faster, and cheaper, corporations can simply build production facilities wherever is most profitable for them
the role of government policy
growing awareness surrounding worker and environmental exploitation led to greater governmental regulation (wages, safety, benefit for workers)
tax rates, trade investments, etc. also weigh in
trade
inputs (raw materials) + manufactured components → industrial production → outputs (goods for sale to consumers)
inputs and consumers are often found globally, so trade affects distribution when locating facilities
many European countries encourage free trade (quick and cheap transportation of goods, no tariffs, import quotas, other restrictions)
easy to import and export goods
relatively open trade policies in countries such as South Korea, Singapore, and Japan (East Asia)
highly restrictive trade policies in countries such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Iraq (Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East)
worse for industrial production due to slow and expensive customs and procedures
labor
government regulations on labor must be taken into consideration as well
labor flexibility — flexible labor markets = limited regulation on minimum wages, mandated taxes, worker benefits, and job security
eg. US has a low federal minimum wage, no government-mandated health or vacation requirements, “at will” employment policies (easy to hire/fire)
other labor flexible places include Singapore, Denmark, Uganda, and Somalia (dispersed geographically and developmentally)
American labor laws can vary by place, minimum wage is very different in different parts of the country
taxes
tax burden must also be considered
lowest tax burdens are mainly in Middle Eastern oil states, “tax havens” eg. Liechtenstein (Europe) and the Bahamas (Caribbean)
overall business environment
subjective and highly dependent on which factors are valued; the World Bank ranks business friendliness based on the following factors:
costs and time associated with obtaining permits to start a business
obtaining construction permits
getting electrical rigs
obtaining financing
paying taxes
importing/exporting goods
legal protections for investors and contract enforcement
the Heritage Foundation takes different factors into consideration when determining business friendliness:
size of government (tax burden)
rule of law
overall regulatory environment (labor laws)
openness of markets to investment and trade
different criteria used by the two sources, but heavy overlap between rankings
thirteen of the top twenty are the same in each list (eg. Hong Kong, the US, UK, many Eastern European Countries, Denmark, Sweden)
worst overlap too (difficult to invest privately, start industry)
most highly-ranking countries have high standards of living while those who do not are often less-developed countries
economic growth leads to higher tax revenue which increases the average standard of living within a country
best regulatory environments
country (listed alphabetically) | World Bank Ranking | Heritage Foundation Ranking |
---|---|---|
Australia | 15 | 5 |
Denmark | 3 | 18 |
Estonia | 12 | 6 |
Hong Kong Sar, China | 4 | 1 |
Ireland | 18 | 9 |
Latvia | 14 | 20 |
New Zealand | 1 | 3 |
Singapore | 2 | 2 |
Sweden | 9 | 19 |
Taiwan, China | 11 | 11 |
United Kingdom | 7 | 12 |
United States | 8 | 17 |
worst regulatory environments (alphabetically)
Afghanistan
Angola
Chad
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Liberia
Timor-Leste
Venezuela
government incentives
generalized regulations
business incentives
eg. tax breaks, subsidized land, liberalized labor/import laws, modern and reliable infrastructure
strategy and end goal: subsidize industrial development until special incentives are no longer needed
the role of labor
dependent on the type of manufacturing being performed
skilled labor usually entails technical certification, and higher educational degrees
automation decreases the need for less-skilled workers