Types of Democracies

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/29

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

30 Terms

1
New cards

Types of Democracies

presidential, semi-presidential, or parliamentary

2
New cards

Government (Definition)

The political chief executive and their cabinet (the CGG).

3
New cards

Classifying Democracies (Method)

how the government is selected, how it comes to power, and how it stays in power

4
New cards

Legislative Responsibility Question

legislature can remove head of government

5
New cards

presidential democracy

absence of legislative responsibility (legislator can’t remove government without cause) + president is head of state + head of government

6
New cards

Semi-Presidential Democracy

If the government is responsible to the legislature and the head of state is popularly elected for a fixed term (ex: France)

2 types: premier (prime minister has power, not pres) and president (president has more power)

7
New cards

Parliamentary Democracy

If the government is responsible to the legislature and the head of state is not popularly elected for a fixed term (e.g., UK, Belgium).

8
New cards

Head of State vs. Head of Government

In presidential systems (e.g., US), the president is both. Presence of a president does not determine regime type. Monarchies are automatically parliamentary.

9
New cards

Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies

Citizens vote for the legislature, which determines the government.

10
New cards

Office-Seeking World

Politicians want to maximize control of portfolios. They distribute cabinet portfolios proportionally to legislative seats (Gamson’s Law) and form the smallest Minimal Winning Coalition (MWC) → ideally the Least MWC.

11
New cards

Policy-Seeking World

Politicians choose coalition partners closest to them ideologically → Connected/Compact Coalition, ideally a Connected Least MWC.

12
New cards

Trade-Off Between Models

In practice, politicians appear similar because democracies force them to consider both office- and policy-seeking goals.

13
New cards

Doctrine of Ministerial Responsibility

The government acts as one entity and is collectively accountable to parliament.

14
New cards

Doctrine of Collective Cabinet Responsibility

Cabinet members must publicly support all government decisions, even if they internally disagree.

15
New cards

Importance of These Doctrines

When the government falls, the entire cabinet falls. They maintain unity, prevent infighting, and avoid strategic reshuffling.

16
New cards

Gamson’s Law

Coalition parties receive cabinet portfolios proportional to their contribution to the coalition’s legislative majority.

17
New cards

Types of Government

Minority governments, surplus majority governments, supermajorities, and pre-electoral coalitions.

18
New cards

Presidential Democracies: The Government

Composed of the president and cabinet. The president appoints cabinet members

19
New cards

Principal–Agent Framework

Principals (beneficiaries) rely on agents (decision-makers) to act on their behalf. Delegation forms chains of responsibility.

20
New cards

Benefits of Delegation

Expertise, reduced effort and cost for citizens, ability to handle complex or time-consuming tasks.

21
New cards

Costs of Delegation

Power transfer problems, shirking, and agency loss (difference between agents’ implemented policy and principals’ preferred policy).

22
New cards

Successful Delegation

Improves the principal’s welfare relative to no delegation.

23
New cards

Principal–Agent Game

Agent proposes policy first; principal accepts or rejects. Both have single-peaked preferences on a 0–10 policy scale. The agent must propose within the principal’s region of acceptability.

24
New cards

Agency Loss

The net difference between the agent’s chosen policy and the principal’s preferred policy within the acceptance region.

25
New cards

Role of Incomplete Information

Creates adverse selection and moral hazard problems.

26
New cards

Adverse Selection

Principal cannot observe the agent’s skills or preferences. Parties try to signal policy positions, but voters may still elect incompetent or corrupt agents.

27
New cards

Moral Hazard

Principal cannot fully observe agent’s actions, allowing agents to act against principal interests.

28
New cards

Mitigating Adverse Selection (Ex-Ante Mechanisms)

• Screening processes

• Campaigning in presidential systems (signals effort more than skill)

• Party-based promotion in parliamentary systems (filtration theory)

• Forcing agents to reveal their type

29
New cards

Mitigating Moral Hazard (Ex-Post Mechanisms)

• Joining specific parties

• Skill-appropriate appointments

• Fire-alarm oversight: procedures enabling principals to detect violations

• Police patrol oversight: direct monitoring

• Free media

30
New cards

Minimum Winning Coalition (MWC)

coalition with just enough parties to control legislative majority)