Hughes’ policeman doll study

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:51 PM on 12/31/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

6 Terms

1
New cards

Hughes’ study: AIM

To create a test of egocentrism that would be more understandable to children younger than 7 years old.

(Aka. An alternate experiment to Piaget’s “three mountains” task)

2
New cards

Hughes’ study: METHOD

  • Children aged 3.5 - 5 were shown a model with two intersecting walls

  • The child was asked to hide one boy doll and one policeman doll to ensure they understood the task.

  • The child’s egocentrism was then tested, asking the child to hide the boy doll from the policemen to test if they could “see from the policemen’s perspectives

3
New cards

Hughes’ study: RESULTS

  • 90 prevent of the children ages 3.5 - 5 could hide the boy doll from two policemen

  • When a complex model was used with five or six walls, 60 percent of 3 year olds and 90 percent of 4 year olds could still hide the boy doll correctly.

4
New cards

Hughes’ study: CONCLUSION

The study shows that children aged 4 are mostly likely not egocentric,

Piaget underestimated younger children’s abilities because his three mountains task most likely didn’t make sense to the children

5
New cards

Hughes’ study: STRENGTH

The task made sense to the children.

Hiding a doll from a policeman is easier to think about than selecting a view of a mountain top (Piaget’s method.)

A more realistic test of the children’s abilities

6
New cards

Hughes’ study: WEAKNESS

The researchers’ expectations may have influenced the childrens’ behaviour.

They may unconsciously have given the children cues how to behave in the policeman task, which could have caused the results to lack validity.