Chapter Three: The Social Self
The capacity for self-reflection is necessary
Allows people to understand their own motives, emotions, and causes of their behavior
The self is heavily influenced by social factors
ABCs of the self
A: Affect
B: Behavior
C: Cognition
Cocktail Party Effect: The tendency of people to pick a personally relevant stimulus, like a name, out of a complex and noisy environment
Shows that the self is a brightly lit object of our attention
Self-Concept: Sum total of beliefs that people have about themselves
Made up of self-schemas
Self-schemas: Beliefs about oneself that guide the processing of relevant information
Schematic: An attribute you contribute you yourself
Aschematic: An attribute you don’t contribute to yourself
Double Consciousness: People who identify with two cultures may have a double consciousness, in which they hold different self-schemas that fit within each culture
Our sense of identity is biologically rooted
Synaptic connections in the brain provide the biological base for memory, which makes possible the sense of continuity that is needed for a normal identity
Our sense of self emerges in childhood through our social interactions
The self can be transformed or completely destroyed by damage to the brain and nervous system
Severe head injuries
Brain tumors
Diseases
Exposure to toxic substances
Certain areas become more active when participants viewed self-referent words, pictures, and perspectives
Nonhuman animals and self-recognition
Only great apes (chimps, gorillas, orangutans) seem capable of self-recognition
Emerges in young adolescence and is stable across the life span, until old age
First clear expression of the concept “me”
The self as a social concept
Looking-glass Self: Other people serve as a mirror in which we see ourselves
We come to know ourselves by imagining what significant others think of us and then incorporating these perceptions into our self-concepts
The self is relational
We draw our sense of who we are from our past and current relationships with the significant others in our lives
Our self-concepts match our perceptions of what others think of us
People can distinguish between how they perceive themselves and how others see them
We can tell when our perceptions of what others think of us are more or less correct
Our self-concepts come from
Introspection: A looking inward at one’s own thoughts and feelings
Gives us self-knowledge
Not always accurate in self-knowledge
It’s possible to think too much and be too analytical, which confuses our self-knowledge
People overestimate the positives
Overrate their own skills, etc.
Many people have insight into their own biases
People who harbor biased self-perceptions accurately describe themselves as biased when prompted
Affective Forecasting: People have difficulty projecting forward and predicting how they would feel in response to future emotional events
Impact Bias: People overestimate the strength and duration of their emotional reactions
People don’t fully appreciate the extent to which our psychological coping mechanisms help us to cushion the blow
When we introspect about the emotional impact of us of a future event, we become so focused on that single event that we neglect to take into account the effects of other life experiences
Self-Perception Theory (Daryl Bem): People can learn about themselves the same way outside observers do - by watching their own behavior
People learn about themselves through self-perception only when the situation alone seems insufficient to have caused their behavior
Vicarious Self-Perception: You can infer something about yourself by observing the behavior of someone else with whom you completely identify
Self-Other Knowledge Asymmetry (SOKA): We know ourselves better than others do when it comes to traits that are internal and hard to observe, but there is no self-other difference when it comes to traits that are external and easy to observe
Others may actually know us better than we know ourselves when it comes to observable traits that can be touchy for self-esteem purposes (blind spots)
Facial Feedback Hypothesis: Changes in facial expression can trigger corresponding changes in the subjective experience of emotion
Facial expressions affect emotion through a process of self-perception
Facial movements spark emotion by producing physiological changes in the brain
Other expressive behaviors can also provide us with sensory feedback and influence the way we feel
Body Posture: Your emotional state is revealed in the way you carry yourself
People can lift their spirits by expansion and lower their spirits by contraction
Expansion: Stand erect w shoulders raised, chest expanded, and head held high
Contraction: Slump over with shoulders drooping and head bowed
Overjustification Effect: Reward for an enjoyable activity can undermine interest in that activity
Intrinsic motivation is undermined by some types of rewards (ex: money) but not others (ex: praise)
Intrinsic Motivation: People engage in an activity for the sake of their own interest, the challenge, or sheer enjoyment
People are more likely to be creative when they are intrinsically motivated in relation to the task
Extrinsic Motivation: People engage in an activity as a means to an end / for tangible benefit
Other people
Social Comparison Theory: When people are uncertain of their abilities or opinions they evaluate themselves through comparisons with similar others
The self is malleable according to our need to fit in with those around us
People judge themselves in relation to others even when more objective standards really are available
People are less influenced by social comparisons when objective information is available
Facebook and social comparison
Two types of usage
Active usage: Ppl post info about themselves and communicate with others
Passive usage: People consume info from other people without making direct contact
Facebook usage may undermine a person’s well-being
The link between Facebook usage and self-evaluation depends on whom we compare ourselves to
People on facebook tend to portray themselves in overly flattering ways, which increases the likelihood that the social comparisons we make are not personally favorable
Two-factor Theory of Emotion: A person experiences the symptoms of physiological arousal and makes a cognitive interpretation that explains the source of the arousal
The reactions of the people around us help us interpret our own arousal
Some studies corroborated these findings but others didn’t
Autobiographical Memories: Recollections of the sequences of events that have touched your life
Memories shape the self-concept
Self-concept shapes our personal memories as well
Recency Rule: When people are prompted to recall their own experiences, they typically report more events from the recent past than from the distant past
Reminiscence Bump: Older adults tend to retrieve a large number of personal memories from their adolescence and early adult years (busy and formative years in one’s life)
People tend to remember transitional firsts
Not all experiences leave the same impression
Flashbulb Memories: Enduring, detailed, high-resolution recollections
Humans are biologically equipped for survival purposes to “print” dramatic events in memory
Not necessarily accurate or consistent over time
Recollections feel special
People tend to distort the past in ways that inflate their own sense of importance and achievement
People feel psychologically closer to memories that are positive rather than negative
When our self-concept changes, so does our visual perspective on the past
Our current self-concept colors how we see our past selves - Lisa Libby and Richard Eibach
The process of remembering can be a positive emotional experience
Nostalgia: A sentimental longing for the past
Our cultures
Individualism: One’s personal goals take priority over group allegiances
People strive for personal achievement
Collectivism: A person is first and foremost a loyal member of a group
People derive satisfaction from the status of a valued group
Individualism and collectivism are so deeply ingrained in a culture that they mold our very self-conceptions and identities
Independent view of self: The self is an entity that is distinct, autonomous, self-contained, and endowed with unique dispositions
Interdependent view of self: The self is part of a larger network that includes one’s family, coworkers, and others with whom one is socially connected
Our cultural orientations can color the way people perceive, evaluate, and present themselves in relation to others
Our cultural orientations toward conformity or independence may lead us to favor similarity or uniqueness in all things
American college students see themselves as less similar to other people than do Asian students
Dialecticism: An Eastern system of thought that accepts the coexistence of contradictory characteristics within a single person
Social class is another cultural factor that can influence the self-concept
Self-Esteem: Our positive and negative evaluations of ourselves
Self-esteem is a state of mind that fluctuates up and down in response to success, failure, social relations, and other life experiences
People typically view parts of the self differently
Self-esteem stays roughly the same from childhood through old age
People who are high or low in self-esteem remain in that relative position throughout life
Average level of self-esteem in a population varies over the course of a lifetime
Sociometer Theory (Mark Leary and Roy Baumeister): People are inherently social animals and the desire for self-esteem is driven by a primitive need to connect with others and gain their approval
Sociometer: A mechanism that enables us to detect acceptance and rejection and translate those perceptions into high and low self-esteem
Self-esteem serves as a rough indicator of how we’re doing in the eyes of others
Terror Management Theory (Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon, Thomas Pyszczynski): Humans are biologically programmed for life and self-preservation, so they cope with the fear of their own death by constructing worldviews that help to preserve their self-esteem
Men have higher self esteem when it comes to physical appearance and athletic abilities
Women have higher self esteem when it comes to ethics and personal morality
Black Americans have higher self esteem than white Americans
Self-Discrepancy Theory: Our self-esteem is defined by the match or mismatch between how we see ourselves and how we want to see ourselves
Self-Guides: Personal standards
Our self-discrepancies may set into motion a self-perpetuating process
Self-Awareness Theory: Most people are not usually self-focused, but certain situations predictably force us to turn inward and become the objects of our own attention
We enter into a state of heightened self-awareness that leads us to compare our behavior to some high standard
The more self-focused people are, the more likely they are to find themselves in a bad mood
Coping:
Shape Up: Behaving in ways that help reduce our self-discrepancies
Ship Out: Withdrawing from self-awareness
Private Self-Consciousness: The tendency to introspect about our inner thoughts and feelings
You listen to an inner voice and try to reduce discrepancies relative to your own standards
Public Self-Consciousness: The tendency to focus on our outer public image
You try to match your behavior to socially accepted norms
Thinking about God triggers a state of self-focus
Self-Regulation: The processes by which we seek to control or alter our thoughts, feelings, behaviors, and urges in order to live an acceptable social life
Conflicts between our desires and the need for self-control are constant
Self-control is a limited inner resource that can temporarily be depleted by usage
All self-control efforts draw from a single common reservoir
Exercising self-control is like flexing a muscle
We can control ourselves only so much before self-regulation fatigue sets in
Psychological factors can counteract self-regulation fatigue
Choking: Paradoxical type of failure caused by trying too hard and thinking too much
Ironic Processes: At times, the harder you try to inhibit a thought, feeling, or behavior, the less likely you are to succeed
Better-Than-Average Effect: People in general believe they are better, more honorable, more capable, and more compassionate
Self-Enhancement Biases: People think highly of themselves most of the time
People are more likely to see themselves as better than average when it comes to personal traits that are important
Implicit Egotism: An unconscious and subtle expression of self-esteem
People are quicker to associate “self” words with positive traits than with negative traits
The positive associations people form with the sight and sound of their own name may draw them toward other people, places, and entities that share this most personal aspect of “self”
Links result from a statistical fluke
Name effect may result from an ethnic bias
Self-Serving Beliefs
Inflationary distortions most pronounced with those who’ve done poorly
As memories fade, the potential for self-enhancing recollections of test scores is increased
People tend to take credit for success and distance themselves from failure
Most of us are unrealistically optimistic about the future (optimistic bias)
People harbor illusions of control, overestimating the extent to which they can influence personal outcomes
Self-Handicapping: Actions people take to handicap their own performance in order to build an excuse for anticipated failure
People make excuses for past performances and come up with excuses in anticipation of future performances
Procrastination: A purposive delay in starting or completing a task that is due at a particular time
Helps to provide an excuse for possible failure
Some people use self-handicapping as a defense more than others do and in different ways
Men self-handicap by taking drugs or neglecting to practice
Women self-handicap by reporting stress and physical symptoms
Setting goals too high
Sandbagging: People play down their own ability, lower expectations, and publicly predict that they’ll fail
Bask in Reflected Glory: showing off connections to successful others
Your self-esteem is influenced by individuals and groups with whom you identity
Downward Social Comparisons: Comparing self with others who are less successful, less happy, or less fortunate
We make temporal comparisons between our past and present selves
Positive illusions of self promote happiness, the desire to care for others, and the ability to engage in productive work
By deceiving ourselves in ways that create positive illusions, we are able to display greater confidence in public than we may feel, making us more successful in our social relations
Positive illusions can give rise to chronic patterns of self-defeating behavior
East Asians are quick to associate the self with positive traits, but are more likely to associate the self with contradictory negative traits as well
People from Individualist and Collectivist cultures are similarly motivated to think highly of themselves
Cultures influence how we seek to fulfill that need
Self-Presentation: The process by which we try to shape what other people think of us and what we think of ourselves
Most people are acutely concerned about the image they present to others
Spotlight Effect: A tendency to believe that the social spotlight shines more brightly on them than it really does
Strategic Self-Presentation: Our efforts to shape others’ impressions in specific ways in order to gain influence, power, sympathy, or approval
Ingratiation: Acts that are motivated by the desire to get along with others and be liked
Self-Promotion: Acts that are motivated by a desire to get ahead and gain respect for one’s competence
Self-Verification: The desire to have others perceive us as we truly perceive ourselves
Self-Monitoring: The tendency to regulate one’s own behavior to meet the demands of social situations
The capacity for self-reflection is necessary
Allows people to understand their own motives, emotions, and causes of their behavior
The self is heavily influenced by social factors
ABCs of the self
A: Affect
B: Behavior
C: Cognition
Cocktail Party Effect: The tendency of people to pick a personally relevant stimulus, like a name, out of a complex and noisy environment
Shows that the self is a brightly lit object of our attention
Self-Concept: Sum total of beliefs that people have about themselves
Made up of self-schemas
Self-schemas: Beliefs about oneself that guide the processing of relevant information
Schematic: An attribute you contribute you yourself
Aschematic: An attribute you don’t contribute to yourself
Double Consciousness: People who identify with two cultures may have a double consciousness, in which they hold different self-schemas that fit within each culture
Our sense of identity is biologically rooted
Synaptic connections in the brain provide the biological base for memory, which makes possible the sense of continuity that is needed for a normal identity
Our sense of self emerges in childhood through our social interactions
The self can be transformed or completely destroyed by damage to the brain and nervous system
Severe head injuries
Brain tumors
Diseases
Exposure to toxic substances
Certain areas become more active when participants viewed self-referent words, pictures, and perspectives
Nonhuman animals and self-recognition
Only great apes (chimps, gorillas, orangutans) seem capable of self-recognition
Emerges in young adolescence and is stable across the life span, until old age
First clear expression of the concept “me”
The self as a social concept
Looking-glass Self: Other people serve as a mirror in which we see ourselves
We come to know ourselves by imagining what significant others think of us and then incorporating these perceptions into our self-concepts
The self is relational
We draw our sense of who we are from our past and current relationships with the significant others in our lives
Our self-concepts match our perceptions of what others think of us
People can distinguish between how they perceive themselves and how others see them
We can tell when our perceptions of what others think of us are more or less correct
Our self-concepts come from
Introspection: A looking inward at one’s own thoughts and feelings
Gives us self-knowledge
Not always accurate in self-knowledge
It’s possible to think too much and be too analytical, which confuses our self-knowledge
People overestimate the positives
Overrate their own skills, etc.
Many people have insight into their own biases
People who harbor biased self-perceptions accurately describe themselves as biased when prompted
Affective Forecasting: People have difficulty projecting forward and predicting how they would feel in response to future emotional events
Impact Bias: People overestimate the strength and duration of their emotional reactions
People don’t fully appreciate the extent to which our psychological coping mechanisms help us to cushion the blow
When we introspect about the emotional impact of us of a future event, we become so focused on that single event that we neglect to take into account the effects of other life experiences
Self-Perception Theory (Daryl Bem): People can learn about themselves the same way outside observers do - by watching their own behavior
People learn about themselves through self-perception only when the situation alone seems insufficient to have caused their behavior
Vicarious Self-Perception: You can infer something about yourself by observing the behavior of someone else with whom you completely identify
Self-Other Knowledge Asymmetry (SOKA): We know ourselves better than others do when it comes to traits that are internal and hard to observe, but there is no self-other difference when it comes to traits that are external and easy to observe
Others may actually know us better than we know ourselves when it comes to observable traits that can be touchy for self-esteem purposes (blind spots)
Facial Feedback Hypothesis: Changes in facial expression can trigger corresponding changes in the subjective experience of emotion
Facial expressions affect emotion through a process of self-perception
Facial movements spark emotion by producing physiological changes in the brain
Other expressive behaviors can also provide us with sensory feedback and influence the way we feel
Body Posture: Your emotional state is revealed in the way you carry yourself
People can lift their spirits by expansion and lower their spirits by contraction
Expansion: Stand erect w shoulders raised, chest expanded, and head held high
Contraction: Slump over with shoulders drooping and head bowed
Overjustification Effect: Reward for an enjoyable activity can undermine interest in that activity
Intrinsic motivation is undermined by some types of rewards (ex: money) but not others (ex: praise)
Intrinsic Motivation: People engage in an activity for the sake of their own interest, the challenge, or sheer enjoyment
People are more likely to be creative when they are intrinsically motivated in relation to the task
Extrinsic Motivation: People engage in an activity as a means to an end / for tangible benefit
Other people
Social Comparison Theory: When people are uncertain of their abilities or opinions they evaluate themselves through comparisons with similar others
The self is malleable according to our need to fit in with those around us
People judge themselves in relation to others even when more objective standards really are available
People are less influenced by social comparisons when objective information is available
Facebook and social comparison
Two types of usage
Active usage: Ppl post info about themselves and communicate with others
Passive usage: People consume info from other people without making direct contact
Facebook usage may undermine a person’s well-being
The link between Facebook usage and self-evaluation depends on whom we compare ourselves to
People on facebook tend to portray themselves in overly flattering ways, which increases the likelihood that the social comparisons we make are not personally favorable
Two-factor Theory of Emotion: A person experiences the symptoms of physiological arousal and makes a cognitive interpretation that explains the source of the arousal
The reactions of the people around us help us interpret our own arousal
Some studies corroborated these findings but others didn’t
Autobiographical Memories: Recollections of the sequences of events that have touched your life
Memories shape the self-concept
Self-concept shapes our personal memories as well
Recency Rule: When people are prompted to recall their own experiences, they typically report more events from the recent past than from the distant past
Reminiscence Bump: Older adults tend to retrieve a large number of personal memories from their adolescence and early adult years (busy and formative years in one’s life)
People tend to remember transitional firsts
Not all experiences leave the same impression
Flashbulb Memories: Enduring, detailed, high-resolution recollections
Humans are biologically equipped for survival purposes to “print” dramatic events in memory
Not necessarily accurate or consistent over time
Recollections feel special
People tend to distort the past in ways that inflate their own sense of importance and achievement
People feel psychologically closer to memories that are positive rather than negative
When our self-concept changes, so does our visual perspective on the past
Our current self-concept colors how we see our past selves - Lisa Libby and Richard Eibach
The process of remembering can be a positive emotional experience
Nostalgia: A sentimental longing for the past
Our cultures
Individualism: One’s personal goals take priority over group allegiances
People strive for personal achievement
Collectivism: A person is first and foremost a loyal member of a group
People derive satisfaction from the status of a valued group
Individualism and collectivism are so deeply ingrained in a culture that they mold our very self-conceptions and identities
Independent view of self: The self is an entity that is distinct, autonomous, self-contained, and endowed with unique dispositions
Interdependent view of self: The self is part of a larger network that includes one’s family, coworkers, and others with whom one is socially connected
Our cultural orientations can color the way people perceive, evaluate, and present themselves in relation to others
Our cultural orientations toward conformity or independence may lead us to favor similarity or uniqueness in all things
American college students see themselves as less similar to other people than do Asian students
Dialecticism: An Eastern system of thought that accepts the coexistence of contradictory characteristics within a single person
Social class is another cultural factor that can influence the self-concept
Self-Esteem: Our positive and negative evaluations of ourselves
Self-esteem is a state of mind that fluctuates up and down in response to success, failure, social relations, and other life experiences
People typically view parts of the self differently
Self-esteem stays roughly the same from childhood through old age
People who are high or low in self-esteem remain in that relative position throughout life
Average level of self-esteem in a population varies over the course of a lifetime
Sociometer Theory (Mark Leary and Roy Baumeister): People are inherently social animals and the desire for self-esteem is driven by a primitive need to connect with others and gain their approval
Sociometer: A mechanism that enables us to detect acceptance and rejection and translate those perceptions into high and low self-esteem
Self-esteem serves as a rough indicator of how we’re doing in the eyes of others
Terror Management Theory (Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon, Thomas Pyszczynski): Humans are biologically programmed for life and self-preservation, so they cope with the fear of their own death by constructing worldviews that help to preserve their self-esteem
Men have higher self esteem when it comes to physical appearance and athletic abilities
Women have higher self esteem when it comes to ethics and personal morality
Black Americans have higher self esteem than white Americans
Self-Discrepancy Theory: Our self-esteem is defined by the match or mismatch between how we see ourselves and how we want to see ourselves
Self-Guides: Personal standards
Our self-discrepancies may set into motion a self-perpetuating process
Self-Awareness Theory: Most people are not usually self-focused, but certain situations predictably force us to turn inward and become the objects of our own attention
We enter into a state of heightened self-awareness that leads us to compare our behavior to some high standard
The more self-focused people are, the more likely they are to find themselves in a bad mood
Coping:
Shape Up: Behaving in ways that help reduce our self-discrepancies
Ship Out: Withdrawing from self-awareness
Private Self-Consciousness: The tendency to introspect about our inner thoughts and feelings
You listen to an inner voice and try to reduce discrepancies relative to your own standards
Public Self-Consciousness: The tendency to focus on our outer public image
You try to match your behavior to socially accepted norms
Thinking about God triggers a state of self-focus
Self-Regulation: The processes by which we seek to control or alter our thoughts, feelings, behaviors, and urges in order to live an acceptable social life
Conflicts between our desires and the need for self-control are constant
Self-control is a limited inner resource that can temporarily be depleted by usage
All self-control efforts draw from a single common reservoir
Exercising self-control is like flexing a muscle
We can control ourselves only so much before self-regulation fatigue sets in
Psychological factors can counteract self-regulation fatigue
Choking: Paradoxical type of failure caused by trying too hard and thinking too much
Ironic Processes: At times, the harder you try to inhibit a thought, feeling, or behavior, the less likely you are to succeed
Better-Than-Average Effect: People in general believe they are better, more honorable, more capable, and more compassionate
Self-Enhancement Biases: People think highly of themselves most of the time
People are more likely to see themselves as better than average when it comes to personal traits that are important
Implicit Egotism: An unconscious and subtle expression of self-esteem
People are quicker to associate “self” words with positive traits than with negative traits
The positive associations people form with the sight and sound of their own name may draw them toward other people, places, and entities that share this most personal aspect of “self”
Links result from a statistical fluke
Name effect may result from an ethnic bias
Self-Serving Beliefs
Inflationary distortions most pronounced with those who’ve done poorly
As memories fade, the potential for self-enhancing recollections of test scores is increased
People tend to take credit for success and distance themselves from failure
Most of us are unrealistically optimistic about the future (optimistic bias)
People harbor illusions of control, overestimating the extent to which they can influence personal outcomes
Self-Handicapping: Actions people take to handicap their own performance in order to build an excuse for anticipated failure
People make excuses for past performances and come up with excuses in anticipation of future performances
Procrastination: A purposive delay in starting or completing a task that is due at a particular time
Helps to provide an excuse for possible failure
Some people use self-handicapping as a defense more than others do and in different ways
Men self-handicap by taking drugs or neglecting to practice
Women self-handicap by reporting stress and physical symptoms
Setting goals too high
Sandbagging: People play down their own ability, lower expectations, and publicly predict that they’ll fail
Bask in Reflected Glory: showing off connections to successful others
Your self-esteem is influenced by individuals and groups with whom you identity
Downward Social Comparisons: Comparing self with others who are less successful, less happy, or less fortunate
We make temporal comparisons between our past and present selves
Positive illusions of self promote happiness, the desire to care for others, and the ability to engage in productive work
By deceiving ourselves in ways that create positive illusions, we are able to display greater confidence in public than we may feel, making us more successful in our social relations
Positive illusions can give rise to chronic patterns of self-defeating behavior
East Asians are quick to associate the self with positive traits, but are more likely to associate the self with contradictory negative traits as well
People from Individualist and Collectivist cultures are similarly motivated to think highly of themselves
Cultures influence how we seek to fulfill that need
Self-Presentation: The process by which we try to shape what other people think of us and what we think of ourselves
Most people are acutely concerned about the image they present to others
Spotlight Effect: A tendency to believe that the social spotlight shines more brightly on them than it really does
Strategic Self-Presentation: Our efforts to shape others’ impressions in specific ways in order to gain influence, power, sympathy, or approval
Ingratiation: Acts that are motivated by the desire to get along with others and be liked
Self-Promotion: Acts that are motivated by a desire to get ahead and gain respect for one’s competence
Self-Verification: The desire to have others perceive us as we truly perceive ourselves
Self-Monitoring: The tendency to regulate one’s own behavior to meet the demands of social situations