AP Gov Court Cases 1-18

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/17

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:13 AM on 3/12/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

18 Terms

1
New cards
Marbury v. Madison
Case in which the Supreme Court first asserted the power of judicial review by finding that part of the congressional statute extending the Court's original jurisdiction was unconstitutional.
2
New cards
McCulloch v. Maryland
Supreme Court ruling that upheld the power of the national government and denied the right of a state to tax the federal bank, using the Constitution's supremacy clause. The Court's broad interpretation of the necessary and proper clause paved the way for later rulings upholding expansive federal powers.
3
New cards
Gibbons v. Ogden
Supreme Court ruling that upheld broad congressional power to regulate interstate commerce. The Court's broad interpretation of the Constitution's commerce clause paved the way for later rulings upholding expansive federal powers.
4
New cards
Plessy v. Ferguson

Supreme Court case that challenged a Louisiana statute requiring that railroads provide separate accommodations for blacks and whites; the Court found that separate-but-equal accommodations did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

5
New cards
Schenck v. U.S.

Supreme Court ruling that upheld the federal Espionage Act, which outlawed resistance against the draft or distributing anti-war leaflets, saying they presented a "clear and present danger" to the conduct of war.

6
New cards
Gitlow v. New York
Does the First Amendment apply to the states? Yes, by virtue of the liberty protected by due process that no state shall deny (14th Amendment) A state may forbid both speech and publication if they have a tendency to result in action dangerous to public security
7
New cards
Korematsu v. U.S.
Supreme Court ruling that upheld the authority of the U.S. government to require mass interment of people of Japanese ancestry in the United States during World War II.
8
New cards
Brown v. Board of Education
U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that school segregation is inherently unconstitutional because it violates the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection of the law.
9
New cards
Mapp v. Ohio
Court ruling that made the "fruits" of all searches conducted illegally inadmissible in court.
10
New cards
Engel v. Vitale
Court case in which the recitation of a brief, nondenominational prayer drafted by the school board was unconstitutional because it violated the First Amendment's religious establishment clause.
11
New cards
Baker v. Carr
Supreme Court case ruling that issues presented by redistricting are within its jurisdiction to review.
12
New cards
Abbington v. Schempp
Prohibited devotional Bible reading in public schools by virtue of establishment clause and due process clause Public schools cannot require students to participate in classroom religious exercises because this violates the religious freedom of students protected in the 1st and 14th Amendments.
13
New cards
Gideon v. Wainwright
Unanimous Supreme Court decision that criminal defendants who cannot afford an attorney are guaranteed one by the Sixth Amendment.
14
New cards
Wesberry v. Sanders
Ordered House districts to be as near equal in population as possible Georgia's congressional districts violated the 14th Amendment and deprived citizens the full benefit of their right to vote
15
New cards
New York Times v. Sullivan
1st Amendment protects publication of all statements, even false ones, except when statements are made with actual malice (intention to do evil)
16
New cards
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.S.
Did Congress, by passing Title II, exceed its Commerce Powers by depriving hotels of the right to choose their own customers? No, Civil Rights Act of 1964 clearly stated places like hotels have no right selecting guests as they see fit
17
New cards
Griswold v. Connecticut
Established right of privacy through 4th and 9th Amendments Set a precedent for Roe v. Wade Connecticut statute conflicts with the exercise to right of privacy and is therefore null and void
18
New cards
Miranda v. Arizona
Landmark Supreme Court ruling holding that the Fifth Amendment requires individuals arrested for a crime to be advised of their right to remain silent and to have counsel present.