electron config and CFSE

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/81

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

82 Terms

1
New cards

what does paramagnetic mean?

there are unpaired electrons

2
New cards

what does diamagnetic mean?

there are no unpaired electrons

3
New cards

what are the 5 d orbitals?

dyz, dxy, dxz, dz2, dx2-y2

4
New cards

what is the shape of dyz?

knowt flashcard image
5
New cards

what is the shape of dxy?

knowt flashcard image
6
New cards

what is the shape of dxz?

knowt flashcard image
7
New cards

what is the shape of dz2?

knowt flashcard image
8
New cards

what is the shape of dx2-y2?

knowt flashcard image
9
New cards

in an octahedral complex, which orbitals are higher energy?

dz2 and dx2-y2

the dz2 lobes are pointing directly at negative point charges on z axis = electrostatic repulsion between electron and ligands (point charges)

dx2-y2 lobes point at negative point charges on x and y axes

10
New cards

why are dyz, dxy, dxz lower in energy for octahedral complexes?

lobes point between negative point charges on axes

no electrostatic repulsion between electron and point charges

11
New cards

what are the two orbital energy levels for octahedral complexes?

3 lower = t2g

2 higher = eg

12
New cards

what is ∆oct?

what is the ratio of heights?

energy difference between t2g and eg

eg is 3/5∆oct and t2g is -2/5∆oct

13
New cards

draw an energy level diagram for octahedral complexes

knowt flashcard image
14
New cards

diagram of tetrahedral in cube (with cartesian axes)

axes aligned through centre of faces of cube

<p>axes aligned through centre of faces of cube</p>
15
New cards

which are the lower orbitals for tetrahedral complexes?

dz2 and dx2-y2

lobes point between point charges (no repulsion between electron and point charge)

<p>d<sub>z<sup>2</sup> </sub>and d<sub>x<sup>2</sup>-y<sup>2</sup></sub></p><p>lobes point between point charges (no repulsion between electron and point charge)</p>
16
New cards

which are the higher orbitals for tetrahedral complexes?

dyz, dxy, dxz

lobes point near to point charges. energy destabilised due to repulsion between electron and point charge

<p>d<sub>yz</sub>, d<sub>xy</sub>, d<sub>xz</sub></p><p>lobes point near to point charges. energy destabilised due to repulsion between electron and point charge </p>
17
New cards

what are the two orbital energy levels for tetrahedral?

lower = e

higher = t2

18
New cards

what is ∆tet?

what is the ratio of heights?

energy difference between e and t2 sets of orbitals

e is -3/5∆oct and t2 is 2/5∆oct

19
New cards

what is the crystal field splitting diagram for tetrahedral complexes?

knowt flashcard image
20
New cards

is ∆tet or ∆oct bigger? what is the relationship?

∆tet is much smaller

∆tet = 4/9∆oct for same metal and ligands

21
New cards

what is the crystal field splitting diagram for square planar?

<p></p>
22
New cards
<p>why is d<sub>x<sup>2</sup>-y<sup>2</sup></sub> highest in energy?</p>

why is dx2-y2 highest in energy?

on same axes as negative point charges

most destabilised

<p>on same axes as negative point charges</p><p>most destabilised </p>
23
New cards
<p>why is d<sub>xy </sub>the second highest energy?</p>

why is dxy the second highest energy?

in same plane as negative charges as negative charges

also destabilised but by a lot less

<p>in same plane as negative charges as negative charges</p><p>also destabilised but by a lot less </p>
24
New cards
<p>why is d<sub>z<sup>2</sup></sub> lower in energy?</p>

why is dz2 lower in energy?

has some orbital lobes in the same plane as negative charges

overall stabilised as most of orbital is away from negative charges

25
New cards
<p>why are d<sub>xz</sub> and d<sub>yz</sub> lowest in energy?</p>

why are dxz and dyz lowest in energy?

furthest away from negative charges

stabilised and degenerate

<p>furthest away from negative charges</p><p>stabilised and degenerate </p>
26
New cards

does high or low spin maximise unpaired electrons?

high spin maximises unpaired electrons

low spin minimises unpaired electrons

27
New cards

how does low spin happen?

all degenerate sets of orbitals are filled before higher energy orbitals

28
New cards

how does high spin happen?

all d orbitals are given an electron before spin pairing

29
New cards

what is P?

spin pairing energy

energy cost of having two negatively charged electrons in one orbital

30
New cards

how to determine if a complex is low or high spin?

depends on ∆ and P (spin pairing energy)

high spin - ∆ < P

low spin ∆ > P

31
New cards

are tetrahedral complexes typically high or low spin?

high spin as ∆tet is small

energy cost of filling higher energy orbitals is smaller than spin pair repulsion

32
New cards

are square planar complexes typically high or low spin?

low spin as ∆ between dxy and dx2-y2 is large

<p>low spin as <span>∆ between d<sub>xy</sub> and d<sub>x<sup>2</sup>-y<sup>2</sup></sub> is large  </span></p>
33
New cards

what is crystal field stabilisation energy?

energy gained from electrons filling d orbitals in crystal field

  • in comparison with no crystal field

34
New cards

how is CFSE calculated?

<p></p>
35
New cards

what is CFSE expression when there are paired electrons?

add P for the number of pairs compared to no crystal field

36
New cards

for which configurations is CFSE zero?

high spin d5

d10

37
New cards

what is the maximum stabilisation?

low spin d6

38
New cards

what is the general expected trend for ionic radii across the periodic table?

ionic radii to decrease

increasing effective nuclear charge, poor shielding by d orbitals

39
New cards

how does CFSE affect ionic radii?

is high or low spin smaller?

when there are crystal field effects the observed radii are smaller than expected

low spin ions are smaller than high spin (for same metal)

40
New cards
<p>if all d orbitals contain equal number of electrons, what is distribution around metal?</p>

if all d orbitals contain equal number of electrons, what is distribution around metal?

spherical

41
New cards
<p>if only some d orbitals filled, what is distribution around metal?</p>

if only some d orbitals filled, what is distribution around metal?

non spherical

42
New cards

what makes M-L bond shorter?

t2g orbitals don’t point towards M-L bond but between

less repulsion between electrons in t2g and ligand

<p>t<sub>2g</sub> orbitals don’t point towards M-L bond but between </p><p>less repulsion between electrons in t<sub>2g</sub> and ligand </p>
43
New cards

what makes M-L bond longer?

eg orbitals point towards M-L bonds - more repulsion between electrons in eg orbitals and ligand

<p>e<sub>g</sub> orbitals point towards M-L bonds - more repulsion between electrons in e<sub>g</sub> orbitals and ligand </p>
44
New cards

how does radii change across periodic table from t2g0eg0 → t2g6eg0

radii decreases with an increase in effective nuclear charge and t2g occupancy

45
New cards

how does radii change across periodic table from t2g6eg1 → t2g6eg4

increasing eg occupancy increases overall repulsion hence radii increases

46
New cards

overall, how does occupancy of t2g and eg change ionic radii?

t2g decreases ionic radii

eg increases ionic radii

47
New cards

does low spin favour a small or large crystal field splitting parameter?

large Δ

Δ > P

48
New cards

does high spin favour a small or large crystal field splitting parameter?

small Δ

Δ < P

49
New cards

what 4 things does the size of Δ determine?

structure

magnetic properties

colour

reaction kinetics

50
New cards

what 5 things determine the size of Δ?

oxidation state of metal

transition series of metal

identity of metal across row

geometry of complex

identity of ligands

51
New cards

how does oxidation state of metal affect Δ?

greater the charge on M, the greater Δ

larger charge = ligands attracted closer to metal = stronger interaction with metal

52
New cards

is M(II) or M(III) complexes more likely to be high/low spin?

M(III) more likely to be low spin

Δ is larger

53
New cards

how does transition series of metal affect Δ (down group)?

how does P change?

Δ increases down the group

larger d orbitals have lower spin pairing energies (P)

54
New cards

are complexes of 2nd and 3rd more likely to be high/low spin?

2nd and 3rd row are more likely to be low spin than 1st row

Δ increases down group

55
New cards

how does identity of metal across row affect Δ?

across first row, for same ligand and ox state, varies irregularly across 1st row

56
New cards

how does geometry of complex affect Δ?

what is ratio of tetrahedral and octahedral?

square planar has large Δ

tetrahedral has small Δ

Δtet = 4/9 Δoct

57
New cards

how does identity of ligands affect Δ?

different ligands have different crystal field strengths

depends on position in spectrochemical series

58
New cards

what is the spectrochemical series?

halides are weak = low Δ

<p>halides are weak = low Δ </p>
59
New cards

how does crystal field theory not explain spectrochemical series?

how do C≡O and halides show this?

assumes ligands are negative point charges and uses ideas of repulsion to explain d orbital splitting

halides are negatively charged and spherical so would expect to be strong

C≡O is neutral but is strong field

60
New cards

what are the two conditions that tetrahedral complexes tend to occur in?

small Δ

d7 electron counts

61
New cards

why does tetrahedral favour d7?

gives all filled or half filled sub shells (only small difference in CFSE for two geometries)

<p>gives all filled or half filled sub shells (only small difference in CFSE for two geometries)</p>
62
New cards

which electron configuration does square planar favour? (for small or large Δ?)

d8 when Δ is large

fully filled sub shells

large negative CFSE

<p>d<sup>8</sup> when Δ is large</p><p>fully filled sub shells</p><p>large negative CFSE </p>
63
New cards

why does larger Δ affect CFSE for square planar?

pushes lower down orbitals more so more energy gained

<p>pushes lower down orbitals more so more energy gained </p>
64
New cards

why do d10 show less of a tendency to favour particular geometries?

do not have CFSE so show less tendency to favour particular geometries

65
New cards

what is Jahn-Teller theorem?

any degenerate quantum mechanical state will distort in such a way to remove that degeneracy

66
New cards

for Cu2+ in octahedral geometry, what is electron configuration? what are the two ways to arrange this config?

how does Jahn-Teller correct this?

why is this energetically favourable?

d9

t2g6e2g3

orbitals split to break degeneracy

two electrons go lower and only one goes higher

<p>d<sup>9</sup> </p><p>t<sub>2g<sup>6</sup></sub>e<sub>2g<sup>3</sup></sub></p><p>orbitals split to break degeneracy </p><p>two electrons go lower and only one goes higher </p>
67
New cards
<p>considering the directions each orbital faces, how will the overall shape of the complex stabilise orbitals to lower energy?</p>

considering the directions each orbital faces, how will the overall shape of the complex stabilise orbitals to lower energy?

elongating octahedral complex along z axis

this is for when dz2 is lower

<p>elongating octahedral complex along z axis </p><p>this is for when d<sub>z<sup>2</sup></sub> is lower </p>
68
New cards
<p>considering the direction each orbital faces, how will the overall shape of the orbital stabilise orbitals to higher energy? </p>

considering the direction each orbital faces, how will the overall shape of the orbital stabilise orbitals to higher energy?

compression of octahedral complex along z axis

this is for when dz2 is higher

<p>compression of octahedral complex along z axis </p><p>this is for when d<sub>z<sup>2</sup></sub> is higher </p>
69
New cards

what is a tetragonal distortion?

elongation of axial bonds (z direction)

<p>elongation of axial bonds (z direction) </p>
70
New cards

for what configurations is Jahn-Teller distortions of octahedral most pronounced for?

odd number of eg electrons

71
New cards

how does tetragonal geometry affect t2g orbitals?

not affected as much as don’t point directly to ligands

<p>not affected as much as don’t point directly to ligands </p>
72
New cards

how does Jahn-Teller work when t2g is unevenly filled?

distortions occur so one of the d orbitals becomes lower energy

the distortions are relatively small as orbitals don’t point directly at ligands

73
New cards

how do individual atoms behave in paramagnetism?

behave independently unless inside external magnetic field

74
New cards

what is the equation for spin-only magnetic moment µso?

n is number of unpaired electrons

units are BM

<p>n is number of unpaired electrons</p><p>units are BM</p>
75
New cards

how is µeff related to µso?

approximately equal

76
New cards

how is µeff determined?

experimentally by measuring magnetic susceptibility of complex

measuring weight changes inside magnetic field caused by alignments of moments with the field

77
New cards

what colour is present if no visible light is absorbed?

white light is reflected = no colour

78
New cards

what causes colour in transition metal complexes?

electronic transitions of electrons in split d orbitals

79
New cards

what is the frequency for red and violet light?

14,300 red

23,800 violet

80
New cards

what is a d-d transition?

from t2g to eg

81
New cards

what do you need for a d-d transition?

d electrons

split d orbitals with unfilled higher energy d orbital in ground state

82
New cards

what are charge transfer transition?

electronic transitions from ligand to metal and vice versa