1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
persuasion
the process by which a message induces change in beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors
central route to persuasion
when people are motivated and able to think about an issue
occurs when interested people focus on the arguments and respond with favorable thoughts
peripheral route to persuasion
if we’re distracted, uninvolved, or just plain busy, we may not take to the time to reflect on the message’s content
occurs when people are influenced by incidental cues, such as a speaker’s attractiveness
which persuasion route leads to more lasting change?
central route processing can lead to more enduring change than the peripheral route
when people think carefully, they rely not only on the strength of the appeals but their own thoughts in response
elements of persuasion explored by social psychologists
the communicator
the message
how the message is communicated
the audience
credibility
perceived expertise and trustworthiness
how long are the effects of source credibility?
they diminish after about a month or so
impact may fade as its source is forgotten or dissociated from the message
how do you become an authoritative “expert”?
to be seen as knowledgeable on the topic
can also be simulated through agreement (with audience)
speaking confidently and fluently raises appearance of credibility
more willing to listen to a communicator we trust, which is higher with a communicator people believe is not trying to persuade them
attractiveness or likability
message content
reason vs emotion depends on the audience you are pitching to
also matters how people’s attitudes were formed: if initially formed through peripheral route then they are more persuaded later through the peripheral appeals
more persuasive through association with good feelings, enhances positive thinking and partly by linking good feelings to with the message
effective by evoking negative emotions
playing on fear works best if a message leads people not only to fear but also to perceive a solution and feel capable of implementing it
two-sided appeals make the communicator seem more honest
foot-in-the-door phenomenon
if you want people to do a big favor for you, you should get them to do a small favor first
lowball technique
a tactic for getting people to agree to something. people who agree with an initial request will often still comply when the requester ups the ante
people who receive only the costly request are less likely to comply with it
later experiments found that this works only if people verbally commit to their choice
door-in-the-face technique
a strategy for gaining a concession. after someone first turns down a large request, the same requester counteroffers with a more reasonable request
primacy effect
information presented early is most persuasive
recency effect
information presented last sometimes has the most influence, less common than primacy effects
when does forgetting create the recency effect?
when enough time separates the two messages
when the audience commits itself soon after the second message
channel of communication
the way the message is delivered - whether face-to-face, in writing, on film, or in some other way
two-step flow of communication
from media to opinion leaders to everyone else
comparing media
if you want to persuade someone who disagrees with you, it is better to do it face to face as your voice humanizes you
messages are best comprehended when written
need for cognition
the motivation to think and analyze. assessed by agreement with items such as “the notion of thinking abstractly is appealing to me” and disagreement with items such as “I only think as hard as I have to”
attitude inoculation
exposing people to weak attacks upon their attitudes so that when stronger attacks come, they will have refutations available
counterarguments
reasons why a persuasive message is wrong