1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What is the importance of physical attractiveness
Related to sexual selection suggested by evolutionary explanation
Symmetrical faces= rated as more attractive as may be signal of genetic fitness
Men attracted to neotenous baby face features eg wide large ayes, small chin and nose= trigger protective or caring instinct from men+ valuable resource for females wanting to reproduce
What is the halo effect?
Cognitive bias= ppl judged to b attractive perceived in positive light
Dion et al 1972 attractive ppl rated as successful kind and sociable compared 2 unattractive = believe attractive ppl physically attractive and expect desirable characteristics and tend 2 behave more postively towards them
What’s the matching hypothesis?
Ppl attracted 2 ppl similar to them in physical attractiveness
Take into account our own attractiveness value to others when seeking a potential romantic partner
Balances wish 2 avoid being rejected by someone out of league w opportunity for affection 2 be reciprocated by someone similar in attractiveness
Research support fo evolutionary processes
Cunningham et al 1955
Females w big eyes prominent cheekbones small nose= attractive by white hispanic and Asian males
Consistent across diff cultures
Attractive features sign of genetic fitness= sexually selected in all cultures = stereotype strong in both collectivist and individualst
UNIVERSAL AND INNATE
=suppports nature side of nature nurture =biological rather than env
Research support halo effect
Palmer and Peterson 2012
Attractive ppl rated more politically knowledgable + competent
Halo effect so strong persisted even when ppants knew knowledgeable ppl had no expertise
Suggests physical attractiveness v imp
Suggests dangers of democracy =politicians suitable just cause attractive
Individual differences matching hypothesis
Indiv diffs of imp of physical attractiveness for relationships
Towhey 1979 ppants strangers photos and some biographical info
Rated how much they like the person , sexists attitudes also measured via questionnaire
Physical attractiveness more imp for sexist attitude ppl
Suggests may not be sig factor in attractiveness while Matching hypothesis suggests always main one
NOMOTHETIC APPROACH not suitable, idiographic more so