APLANG CH.1-3 VOCAB

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 44 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/76

Last updated 12:12 PM on 11/1/22
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

77 Terms

1
New cards
audience
The listener, viewer, or reader of a text. Most texts are likely to have
multiple audiences
2
New cards
concession
An acknowledgment that an opposing argument may be true or reasonable. In a strong argument, a concession is usually accompanied by a refutation challenging the validity of the opposing argument
3
New cards
connotation
Meanings or associations that readers have with a word beyond its
dictionary definition, or denotation. Connotations are usually positive or negative, and they can greatly affect the author’s tone
4
New cards
context
The circumstances, atmosphere, attitudes, and events surrounding a text
5
New cards
counterargument
An opposing argument to the one a writer is putting forward
6
New cards
ethos
Greek for “character.” Speakers appeal to ethos to demonstrate that they
are credible and trustworthy to speak on a given topic
7
New cards
logos
Greek for “embodied thought.” Speakers appeal to logos, or reason, by
offering clear, rational ideas and using specific details, examples, facts, statistics, or expert testimony to back them up
8
New cards
occasion
time and place a speech is given or a piece is written
9
New cards
pathos
Greek for “suffering” or “experience.” Speakers appeal to pathos to emotionally motivate their audience. More specific appeals to pathos might play on the audience’s values, desires, and hopes, on the one hand, or fears and prejudices, on the other
10
New cards
persona
Greek for “mask.” The face or character that a speaker shows to his or
her audience
11
New cards
polemic
Greek for “hostile.” An aggressive argument that tries to establish the
superiority of one opinion over all others. Polemics generally do not concede that opposing opinions have any merit
12
New cards
propaganda
The spread of ideas and information to further a cause. In its negative
sense, propaganda is the use of rumors, lies, disinformation, and scare tactics in order to damage or promote a cause
13
New cards
purpose
The goal the speaker wants to achieve
14
New cards
refutation
A denial of the validity of an opposing argument. In order to sound
reasonable, refutations often follow a concession that acknowledges that an opposing argument may be true or reasonable
15
New cards
rhetoric
As Aristotle defined the term, “the faculty of observing in any given
case the available means of persuasion.” In other words, it is the art of finding ways to persuade an audience
16
New cards
rhetorical appeals
Rhetorical techniques used to persuade an audience by emphasizing what they find most important or compelling. The three major appeals
are to ethos, logos, and pathos
17
New cards
rhetorical triangle (Aristotelian triangle)
A diagram that illustrates the interrelationship among the speaker, audience, and subject in determining a text
18
New cards
SOAPS
Subject, Occasion, Audience, Purpose, and Speaker
19
New cards
speaker
The person or group who creates a text
20
New cards
subject
The topic of a text - what the text is about
21
New cards
text
While this term generally means the written word, in the humanities it has
come to mean any cultural product that can be “read” — meaning not just consumed and comprehended, but investigated
22
New cards
alliteration
Repetition of the same sound beginning several words or syllables
in sequence
23
New cards
allusion
Brief reference to a person, event, or place (real or fictitious) or to a work of art
24
New cards
anaphora
Repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive phrases,
clauses, or lines
25
New cards
antimetabole
Repetition of words in reverse order
26
New cards
antithesis
Opposition, or contrast, of ideas or words in a parallel construction
27
New cards
archaic diction
Old-fashioned or outdated choice of words
28
New cards
asyndeton
Omission of conjunctions between coordinate phrases, clauses, or
words
29
New cards
cumulative sentence
Sentence that completes the main idea at the beginning of
the sentence and then builds and adds on
30
New cards
hortative sentence
Sentence that exhorts, urges, entreats, implores, or calls to
action
31
New cards
imperative sentence
Sentence used to command or enjoin
32
New cards
inversion
Inverted order of words in a sentence (variation of the subject-verb-object order)
33
New cards
juxtaposition
Placement of two things closely together to emphasize similarities
or differences
34
New cards
metaphor
Figure of speech that compares two things without using like or as
35
New cards
oxymoron
Paradoxical juxtaposition of words that seem to contradict one
another
36
New cards
parallelism
Similarity of structure in a pair or series of related words, phrases, or clauses
37
New cards
periodic sentence
Sentence whose main clause is withheld until the end
38
New cards
personification
Attribution of a lifelike quality to an inanimate object or an idea
39
New cards
rhetorical question
Figure of speech in the form of a question posed for rhetorical effect rather than for the purpose of getting an answer
40
New cards
synecdoche
Figure of speech that uses a part to represent the whole
41
New cards
zeugma
Use of two different words in a grammatically similar way that produces different, often incongruous, meanings
42
New cards
ad hominem
Latin for “against the man,” this fallacy refers to the specific diversionary tactic of switching the argument from the issue at hand to the character of the other speaker
43
New cards
ad populum
(bandwagon appeal) This fallacy occurs when evidence boils down
to “everybody’s doing it, so it must be a good thing to do”
44
New cards
appeal to false authority
occurs when someone who has no expertise to speak on an issue is cited as an authority
45
New cards
argument
A process of reasoned inquiry; a persuasive discourse resulting in a
coherent and considered movement from a claim to a conclusion
46
New cards
begging the question
fallacy in which a claim is based on evidence or support
that is in doubt. It “begs” a question whether the support itself is sound
47
New cards
circular reasoning
A fallacy in which the writer repeats the claim as a way to
provide evidence
48
New cards
claim
Also called an assertion or a proposition, a claim states the argument’s
main idea or position
49
New cards
claim of fact
asserts that something is true or not true
50
New cards
claim of policy
proposes a change
51
New cards
claim of value
A claim of value argues that something is good or bad, right or
wrong
52
New cards
classical oration
Five-part argument structure used by classical rhetoricians. The five parts are: introduction, narration, confirmation, refutation, conclusion
53
New cards
introduction (exordium)
Introduces the reader to the subject under discussion
54
New cards
narration (narratio)
Provides factual information and background material on the subject at hand or establishes why the subject is a problem that needs addressing
55
New cards
confirmation (confirmatio)
Usually the major part of the text, the confirmation includes the proof needed to make the writer’s case
56
New cards
refutation (refutatio)
Addresses the counterargument. It is a bridge between the writer’s proof and conclusion
57
New cards
conclusion (peroratio)
Brings the essay to a satisfying close
58
New cards
closed thesis
a statement of the main idea of the argument that also previews the major points the writer intends to make
59
New cards
deduction
a logical process whereby one reaches a conclusion by
starting with a general principle or universal truth (a major premise) and
applying it to a specific case (a minor premise)
The process of deduction is usually demonstrated in the form of a syllogism:
major premise: Exercise contributes to better health.
minor premise: Yoga is a type of exercise.
conclusion: Yoga contributes to better health.
60
New cards
either/or (false dilemma)
A fallacy in which the speaker presents two extreme options as the only possible choices
61
New cards
faulty analogy
A fallacy that occurs when an analogy compares two things that are not comparable
62
New cards
first-hand evidence
Evidence based on something the writer knows, whether it’s from personal experience, observations, or general knowledge of events
63
New cards
hasty generalization
A fallacy in which a faulty conclusion is reached because of inadequate evidence
64
New cards
induction
From the Latin inducere, “to lead into”; a logical process whereby the
writer reasons from particulars to universals, using specific cases in order to draw a conclusion, which is also called a generalization
Exercise promotes weight loss.
Exercise lowers stress levels.
Exercise improves mood and outlook.
generalization: Exercise contributes to better health.
65
New cards
logical fallacy
Potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses in an argument. They often arise from a failure to make a logical connection between the claim and the evidence used to support it
66
New cards
open thesis
a thesis that does not list all the points the writer intends to cover in an essay
67
New cards
post hoc ergo propter hoc
This fallacy is Latin for “after which therefore because of which,” meaning that it is incorrect to always claim that something is a cause just because it happened earlier.
"Correlation does not mean causation"
68
New cards
qualifier
uses words like usually, probably, maybe, in most cases, and most likely to temper the claim, making it less absolute
69
New cards
quantitative evidence
Quantitative evidence includes things that can be measured, cited, counted, or otherwise represented in numbers — for instance, statistics, surveys, polls, census information
70
New cards
rebuttal
a rebuttal gives voice to possible objections
71
New cards
reservation
explains the terms and conditions necessitated by the qualifier
72
New cards
Rogerian arguments
Developed by psychiatrist Carl Rogers, based on the assumption that having a full understanding of an opposing position is essential to responding to it persuasively and refuting it in a way that is accommodating rather than alienating
73
New cards
second-hand evidence
Evidence that is accessed through research, reading, and investigation. Includes factual and historical information, expert opinion, and quantitative data
74
New cards
straw man
A fallacy that occurs when a speaker chooses a deliberately poor or
oversimplified example in order to ridicule and refute an idea
75
New cards
syllogism
A logical structure that uses the major premise and minor premise to
reach a necessary conclusion
major premise: Exercise contributes to better health.
minor premise: Yoga is a type of exercise.
conclusion: Yoga contributes to better health.
76
New cards
Toulmin model
An approach to analyzing and constructing arguments created
by British philosopher Stephen Toulmin in his book The Uses of Argument
(1958). The Toulmin model can be stated as a template:
Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (warrant or assumption), on account of (backing), unless (reservation)
77
New cards
assumption/warrant
the warrant expresses the assumption necessarily shared by the speaker and the audience

Explore top flashcards

Religion Test
Updated 1050d ago
flashcards Flashcards (45)
ENGLISH EXAM BESTIES
Updated 992d ago
flashcards Flashcards (82)
Chapter 17-19
Updated 267d ago
flashcards Flashcards (22)
SAT Vocabulary
Updated 63d ago
flashcards Flashcards (100)
Stage 16 5ed
Updated 13d ago
flashcards Flashcards (44)
Religion Test
Updated 1050d ago
flashcards Flashcards (45)
ENGLISH EXAM BESTIES
Updated 992d ago
flashcards Flashcards (82)
Chapter 17-19
Updated 267d ago
flashcards Flashcards (22)
SAT Vocabulary
Updated 63d ago
flashcards Flashcards (100)
Stage 16 5ed
Updated 13d ago
flashcards Flashcards (44)