APLANG CH.1-3 VOCAB

studied byStudied by 44 People
0.0(0)
get a hint
hint

audience

1/77

Studying Progress

New cards
77
Still learning
0
Almost done
0
Mastered
0
77 Terms
New cards

audience

The listener, viewer, or reader of a text. Most texts are likely to have multiple audiences

New cards
New cards

concession

An acknowledgment that an opposing argument may be true or reasonable. In a strong argument, a concession is usually accompanied by a refutation challenging the validity of the opposing argument

New cards
New cards

connotation

Meanings or associations that readers have with a word beyond its dictionary definition, or denotation. Connotations are usually positive or negative, and they can greatly affect the author’s tone

New cards
New cards

context

The circumstances, atmosphere, attitudes, and events surrounding a text

New cards
New cards

counterargument

An opposing argument to the one a writer is putting forward

New cards
New cards

ethos

Greek for “character.” Speakers appeal to ethos to demonstrate that they are credible and trustworthy to speak on a given topic

New cards
New cards

logos

Greek for “embodied thought.” Speakers appeal to logos, or reason, by offering clear, rational ideas and using specific details, examples, facts, statistics, or expert testimony to back them up

New cards
New cards

occasion

time and place a speech is given or a piece is written

New cards
New cards

pathos

Greek for “suffering” or “experience.” Speakers appeal to pathos to emotionally motivate their audience. More specific appeals to pathos might play on the audience’s values, desires, and hopes, on the one hand, or fears and prejudices, on the other

New cards
New cards

persona

Greek for “mask.” The face or character that a speaker shows to his or her audience

New cards
New cards

polemic

Greek for “hostile.” An aggressive argument that tries to establish the superiority of one opinion over all others. Polemics generally do not concede that opposing opinions have any merit

New cards
New cards

propaganda

The spread of ideas and information to further a cause. In its negative sense, propaganda is the use of rumors, lies, disinformation, and scare tactics in order to damage or promote a cause

New cards
New cards

purpose

The goal the speaker wants to achieve

New cards
New cards

refutation

A denial of the validity of an opposing argument. In order to sound reasonable, refutations often follow a concession that acknowledges that an opposing argument may be true or reasonable

New cards
New cards

rhetoric

As Aristotle defined the term, “the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion.” In other words, it is the art of finding ways to persuade an audience

New cards
New cards

rhetorical appeals

Rhetorical techniques used to persuade an audience by emphasizing what they find most important or compelling. The three major appeals are to ethos, logos, and pathos

New cards
New cards

rhetorical triangle (Aristotelian triangle)

A diagram that illustrates the interrelationship among the speaker, audience, and subject in determining a text

New cards
New cards

SOAPS

Subject, Occasion, Audience, Purpose, and Speaker

New cards
New cards

speaker

The person or group who creates a text

New cards
New cards

subject

The topic of a text - what the text is about

New cards
New cards

text

While this term generally means the written word, in the humanities it has come to mean any cultural product that can be “read” — meaning not just consumed and comprehended, but investigated

New cards
New cards

alliteration

Repetition of the same sound beginning several words or syllables in sequence

New cards
New cards

allusion

Brief reference to a person, event, or place (real or fictitious) or to a work of art

New cards
New cards

anaphora

Repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive phrases, clauses, or lines

New cards
New cards

antimetabole

Repetition of words in reverse order

New cards
New cards

antithesis

Opposition, or contrast, of ideas or words in a parallel construction

New cards
New cards

archaic diction

Old-fashioned or outdated choice of words

New cards
New cards

asyndeton

Omission of conjunctions between coordinate phrases, clauses, or words

New cards
New cards

cumulative sentence

Sentence that completes the main idea at the beginning of the sentence and then builds and adds on

New cards
New cards

hortative sentence

Sentence that exhorts, urges, entreats, implores, or calls to action

New cards
New cards

imperative sentence

Sentence used to command or enjoin

New cards
New cards

inversion

Inverted order of words in a sentence (variation of the subject-verb-object order)

New cards
New cards

juxtaposition

Placement of two things closely together to emphasize similarities or differences

New cards
New cards

metaphor

Figure of speech that compares two things without using like or as

New cards
New cards

oxymoron

Paradoxical juxtaposition of words that seem to contradict one another

New cards
New cards

parallelism

Similarity of structure in a pair or series of related words, phrases, or clauses

New cards
New cards

periodic sentence

Sentence whose main clause is withheld until the end

New cards
New cards

personification

Attribution of a lifelike quality to an inanimate object or an idea

New cards
New cards

rhetorical question

Figure of speech in the form of a question posed for rhetorical effect rather than for the purpose of getting an answer

New cards
New cards

synecdoche

Figure of speech that uses a part to represent the whole

New cards
New cards

zeugma

Use of two different words in a grammatically similar way that produces different, often incongruous, meanings

New cards
New cards

ad hominem

Latin for “against the man,” this fallacy refers to the specific diversionary tactic of switching the argument from the issue at hand to the character of the other speaker

New cards
New cards

ad populum

(bandwagon appeal) This fallacy occurs when evidence boils down to “everybody’s doing it, so it must be a good thing to do”

New cards
New cards

appeal to false authority

occurs when someone who has no expertise to speak on an issue is cited as an authority

New cards
New cards

argument

A process of reasoned inquiry; a persuasive discourse resulting in a coherent and considered movement from a claim to a conclusion

New cards
New cards

begging the question

fallacy in which a claim is based on evidence or support that is in doubt. It “begs” a question whether the support itself is sound

New cards
New cards

circular reasoning

A fallacy in which the writer repeats the claim as a way to provide evidence

New cards
New cards

claim

Also called an assertion or a proposition, a claim states the argument’s main idea or position

New cards
New cards

claim of fact

asserts that something is true or not true

New cards
New cards

claim of policy

proposes a change

New cards
New cards

claim of value

A claim of value argues that something is good or bad, right or wrong

New cards
New cards

classical oration

Five-part argument structure used by classical rhetoricians. The five parts are: introduction, narration, confirmation, refutation, conclusion

New cards
New cards

introduction (exordium)

Introduces the reader to the subject under discussion

New cards
New cards

narration (narratio)

Provides factual information and background material on the subject at hand or establishes why the subject is a problem that needs addressing

New cards
New cards

confirmation (confirmatio)

Usually the major part of the text, the confirmation includes the proof needed to make the writer’s case

New cards
New cards

refutation (refutatio)

Addresses the counterargument. It is a bridge between the writer’s proof and conclusion

New cards
New cards

conclusion (peroratio)

Brings the essay to a satisfying close

New cards
New cards

closed thesis

a statement of the main idea of the argument that also previews the major points the writer intends to make

New cards
New cards

deduction

a logical process whereby one reaches a conclusion by starting with a general principle or universal truth (a major premise) and applying it to a specific case (a minor premise) The process of deduction is usually demonstrated in the form of a syllogism: major premise: Exercise contributes to better health. minor premise: Yoga is a type of exercise. conclusion: Yoga contributes to better health.

New cards
New cards

either/or (false dilemma)

A fallacy in which the speaker presents two extreme options as the only possible choices

New cards
New cards

faulty analogy

A fallacy that occurs when an analogy compares two things that are not comparable

New cards
New cards

first-hand evidence

Evidence based on something the writer knows, whether it’s from personal experience, observations, or general knowledge of events

New cards
New cards

hasty generalization

A fallacy in which a faulty conclusion is reached because of inadequate evidence

New cards
New cards

induction

From the Latin inducere, “to lead into”; a logical process whereby the writer reasons from particulars to universals, using specific cases in order to draw a conclusion, which is also called a generalization Exercise promotes weight loss. Exercise lowers stress levels. Exercise improves mood and outlook. generalization: Exercise contributes to better health.

New cards
New cards

logical fallacy

Potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses in an argument. They often arise from a failure to make a logical connection between the claim and the evidence used to support it

New cards
New cards

open thesis

a thesis that does not list all the points the writer intends to cover in an essay

New cards
New cards

post hoc ergo propter hoc

This fallacy is Latin for “after which therefore because of which,” meaning that it is incorrect to always claim that something is a cause just because it happened earlier. "Correlation does not mean causation"

New cards
New cards

qualifier

uses words like usually, probably, maybe, in most cases, and most likely to temper the claim, making it less absolute

New cards
New cards

quantitative evidence

Quantitative evidence includes things that can be measured, cited, counted, or otherwise represented in numbers — for instance, statistics, surveys, polls, census information

New cards
New cards

rebuttal

a rebuttal gives voice to possible objections

New cards
New cards

reservation

explains the terms and conditions necessitated by the qualifier

New cards
New cards

Rogerian arguments

Developed by psychiatrist Carl Rogers, based on the assumption that having a full understanding of an opposing position is essential to responding to it persuasively and refuting it in a way that is accommodating rather than alienating

New cards
New cards

second-hand evidence

Evidence that is accessed through research, reading, and investigation. Includes factual and historical information, expert opinion, and quantitative data

New cards
New cards

straw man

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker chooses a deliberately poor or oversimplified example in order to ridicule and refute an idea

New cards
New cards

syllogism

A logical structure that uses the major premise and minor premise to reach a necessary conclusion major premise: Exercise contributes to better health. minor premise: Yoga is a type of exercise. conclusion: Yoga contributes to better health.

New cards
New cards

Toulmin model

An approach to analyzing and constructing arguments created by British philosopher Stephen Toulmin in his book The Uses of Argument (1958). The Toulmin model can be stated as a template: Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (warrant or assumption), on account of (backing), unless (reservation)

New cards
New cards

assumption/warrant

the warrant expresses the assumption necessarily shared by the speaker and the audience

New cards