Theme 2: Elite Influence on Opinion and Policy (Zallers + Gilens and Page

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/16

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Zallers' RAS Model

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

17 Terms

1
New cards

Zaller’s RAS Model

Explains how elite messages can shape opinion; Receive, Accept, Sample

2
New cards

Receive

Receive messages from elites; exposure to elite messages and political awareness affects exposure

3
New cards

Accept

filtering through predispositions and accepting messages that fit prior beliefs; reject and ignore inconsistent information

4
New cards

We accept messages that fit prior beliefs via

  • Partisanship

  • Values

  • Ideologies

5
New cards

Sample

expressing opinions on events or policies through context, recency, and salience; explains opinion instability in surveys

6
New cards

Revolving Door Phenomenon

  • The movement of ex-federal public employees into lobbying 

  • They are valuable due to their connections in Washington; have shaped connections with friends and colleagues that they can exploit later on behalf of their clients. 

  • They are better at referring to policy matters, workings of the legislative process, and preferences of particular constituencies. 

  • They are a gateway to many political contributions from other figures or organizations. 

7
New cards

Top of Mind Opinion

Public opinion that is formed after a salient event

8
New cards

Majoritarian Democracy

average citizens influence democracy via elections, voting, and providing public support for politicians

9
New cards

Pluralist Democracy

Interest groups influence democracy through channeling public preferences effectively.

10
New cards

Economic Elite Domination

Wealthy Americans influence democracy through money, connections, and resources

11
New cards

Biased Pluralism

Business groups influence democracy through resource inequality and collective action problems

12
New cards

Opinion formations

Top-down, bottom-up, interactive

13
New cards

Top-down

Elites and media direct opinion

14
New cards

Bottom-up

public preferences constrain elites

15
New cards

Interactive

Feedback between both

16
New cards

Public opinion is constantly

Accessible, not fixed

17
New cards

Gilens and Page’s Conclusion on Policy Outcomes

  • Elites get their way even when the public disagrees

  • Average citizens have near-zero independent influence

  • Interest groups have substantial impact

  • Public gets what they want when elites happen to agree

  • American may not function as a majoritarian democracy in practice