chapter 13 - media violence

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/41

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

42 Terms

1
New cards

You observe Kris punch Laura in the nose and immediately you explain this as due to Kris having a very aggressive personality. You have just committed the

a.   self-serving error

b.   fundamental attribution error

c.   consistency- consensus error

d.   self-fulfilling prophecy

e.   inconsistent information error

b.   fundamental attribution error

2
New cards

What are some social influences?

Norms, conformity, and creates conflict

3
New cards

social influence: norms

Conventions, customs & laws that apply to a group’s behaviour

4
New cards

social influence: conformity

A change in attitude, behaviour or belief brought about by the real or imagined pressure from others

  • conflict

5
New cards

social influence flow chart - conformity

knowt flashcard image
6
New cards

social influence flow chart - non-conformity

knowt flashcard image
7
New cards

subtle influence: models

Our behaviour may be shaped by models, even in absence of direct intentional influence

8
New cards

subtle influence: response disinhibition

Model performs desired, but prohibited act

9
New cards

disinhibition refers to

a loss of control over one's behaviors, thoughts, or emotions, leading to actions or expressions that are inappropriate or socially unacceptable. 

10
New cards

subtle influence: examples

  • crossing on red

  • media violence

  • Increase in suicides following 35 highly publicized suicides in 1950-1969 (Phillips, 1989)

  • 200 after M. Monroe in 1962

11
New cards

Response Facilitation

  • Model performs “legal” behaviour... then we copy

    • e.g.  - Yawning & head nodding

  • Candid Conformity

  • Trivial?

    • Wells & Petty (1980)

12
New cards

Conforming to group pressure

Informational  Vs. Normative

13
New cards

Conforming to group pressure: Informational

  • Group gives information that individual can use for rational decision

  • Private Acceptance

14
New cards

Conforming to group pressure: Normative

  • Pressure to maintain group consensus... “don’t rock the boat”

  • Compliance

15
New cards

Asch's Conformity Studies

Solomon Asch conducted experiments in the 1950s to explore conformity in group settings. Participants were asked to match line lengths, but actors in the group purposely chose incorrect answers. Results showed that individuals often conformed to the group's wrong decision, highlighting the powerful influence of social pressure on behavior.

16
New cards

Compliance with Serious Requests

Milgram’s Studies

  • Subjects recruited by ads

  • “Teacher - Learner” Paradigm

17
New cards

Milgram’s Studies

  • Subject gives feedback with shock generator

  • Experimenter “prods” subject  to continue

  • Psychiatrists predict 2% will complete the

    shock series

18
New cards

Milgram’s Study of Obedience

knowt flashcard image
19
New cards

What are factors are influencing obedience?

status, proximity, generality

20
New cards

factors influencing obedience: status

“Low” status setting  50% complete

21
New cards

factors influencing obedience: proximity

  • Authority figure

  • Proximity of Learner

    • Remote

    • Hear

    • See and hear

    • touch → 30% complete

22
New cards

factors influencing obedience: generality

  • certain subject? no

  • Lab only? no

  • Hofling et. al. (1966)

    Rank & Jacobson (1977)

23
New cards

what are ways to counteracting obedience?

Personal Responsibility, disobedient models,

24
New cards

counteracting obedience: personal responsibility

Obedience drops dramatically

25
New cards

counteracting obedience: Disobedient Models

  • 2 confederates refuse

  • Obedience drops to 10%

26
New cards

Television: by the age of

By the age of:

 5   2 - 3 Hours per day

10    4 - 6 Hours per day

16    Witnessed more than   40,000 murders

18    More time watching   TV than in school

27
New cards

Television

  • 99% of households have at least one TV set

    • more than households with bathtub or telephone

  • On average, set is on 7 hours per day

  • Who watches more?

    • women, preschoolers, retired people

28
New cards

TV CONTENT: Barker & Ball (1969), Waters & Malamud (1975)

1.   8 out of 10 shows contain   violence

2.   Act of violence occurs   every 16 minutes

3.   Murder every 31 minutes

4.   93.5% of cartoons

5.   "Good-Guys" as violent as   "Bad-Guys"

6.   Pain and suffering rarely   shown

7.   About 50% of killers do not   suffer

8.   Most people believe that   there is to much violence

29
New cards

TV Images:

1.   Violence more likely from   minorities

2.   Strangers should not be   trusted

3.   Whites do not get killed as often as nonwhites

4.   Police are frequently violent

5.   Violence and killing are   painless

6.   Violence often goes   unpunished

7.   Both good and bad people   use violence

8.   Violence is a successful   means to an end

30
New cards

CBS (1980)

  • Prime Time:   Average of 1.6 violent acts

  • 6.4 acts per day

  • 2,336 acts per year

31
New cards

Signorielli et al. (1982)

80% of all TV shows contain some violence

71% of prime time shows

94% of “children’s” weekend shows

Average of 5.2 violent acts per hour

32
New cards

Gerber (1993)

   67% of Prime Time contains some kind of violence

National TV Violence Study (1997)

   10,000 programs

   60% contain violence

33
New cards

Parent’s Television Council  (2009)

   monitored prime time programming during “sweeps”  (Feb. and May)

  • A total of 3929 acts of violence, average of 23.39 per hour

  • Parent’s Television Council  (2013)

    • gun or bladed weapon every 3 min.

    • 2017 → 61% of sweeps 

  • Criminal Minds:

    • average of 52.8 acts of violence per episode ( 1 every 68 seconds )

34
New cards
  • Does TV violence cause aggression?

  • Does TV violence influence aggression?

Research Evidence

1. modelling studies

2. laboratory studies

3. long-term field studies

35
New cards

Modelling Studies: Bandura (1971)

Children can acquire new aggressive responses not previously at their disposal.

However, acquisition not equal to performance.

36
New cards

Lab Studies

  • Libert & Baron (1972)

  • Kids (5-6, 8-9) watched either The  Untouchables OR a track film

  • Then had opportunity to either help or hurt another child.

37
New cards

Time pressing Red "Hurt" button (y-axis)

red: violent

white: non-violent

<p>red: violent </p><p>white: non-violent</p>
38
New cards

Field Studies

Black & Bevan (1992)

Aggression scale to movie-goers before or after violent or nonviolent movie

<p><span>Black &amp; Bevan (1992)</span></p><p style="text-align: left"><span>Aggression scale to movie-goers before or after violent or nonviolent movie</span></p><p style="text-align: left"></p>
39
New cards

Long-Term Field Studies

Leyens et al. (1975) School boys exposed to steady diet of either aggressive or nonaggressive films.

Eron (1982)  Three - year study with 748 children.

<p><span>Leyens et al. (1975) School boys exposed to steady diet of either aggressive or nonaggressive films.</span></p><p><span>Eron (1982)&nbsp; Three - year study with 748 children.</span></p>
40
New cards

why do we get these media effects?

  1. Social learning or   modelling

  2. Disinhibition

  3.  Desensitization to pain &   aggression

41
New cards

Changes in the Brain

Wang et al. (2011)

fMRI before and after playing violent video game

Less activation in frontal lobe while completing emotional task… even 1 week after

42
New cards

Does TV violence cause aggression?

Does TV violence influence aggression?

  1. maybe

  2. definitely