1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Aim
Investigate whether schema activation would improve understanding and recall of an ambiguous text
Method
52 participants
Allocated to one of three conditions
In the No Topic group participants heard a passage with no additional information.
In the Topic After group participants were told the topic of the passage after hearing it.
In the Topic Before group participants were told the topic of the passage before hearing it.
All participants were told that they were going to hear a tape-recorded passage.
Were told that they would later be asked to recall the passage as accurately as possible.
All participants were tested at the same time, but they had different answer booklets.
For those who were in the Topic Before group, their instruction sheet said, “The paragraph you will hear will be about washing clothes.”
After listening to the passage, they were asked to rate their comprehension of the passage on a 1 - 7 scale.
On the final page of the booklet, they were asked to recall the passage as accurately as possible.
The Topic After group’s instructions included, “It may help you to know that the paragraph was about washing clothes.”
Results
The results show the average amount of info an individual from each group recalled (out of a possible 18 idea units)
Title before = 5.8 idea units
Title after = 2.5 idea units
No title = 2.8 idea units
Conclusion
Researchers concluded that prior knowledge of a situation does not guarantee its usefulness for comprehension. In order for prior knowledge to aid comprehension, it must become an activated schema
Research Method
Laboratory Experiment
Strengths
high internal validity as it is highly controlled
cause-and-effect relationship
high replicability
real world application in education, helping students improve learning techniques
Limitations
Low ecological validity as it is an artificial task
Participant variability with regard to experience with washing clothes may be a confounding variable
It cannot be determined whether an actual “laundry schema” was activates while listening to the text. There may be different reasons for rate of recall such as good memory skills