Malakoff 2011, Are More People Necessarily a Problem
Machakos
A symbol that rapid population growth is not a recipe for disaster and can even bring benefits
Emphasizes the importance of culture, socioeconomics, and biology
Boomsters: believe that there are potential benefits of reproduction
Impact of population growth in the world’s drylands
World’s drylands: Africa, Asia, Latin America
Many see a crisis looming
Others see some hope for a transition to more sustainable livelihoods
Boserupian hypothesis
According to Boserup, underpopulation is a barrier to development
Population growth could trigger intensification, which is the use of new technologies and more labor to get bigger harvests from less land
She argues that dry areas might not have a fixed carrying capacity because, with more labor, these dry areas could be able to sustain more people over time
Dryland farmers could be counted on to invest in and take care of their land as a solution to natural resource damage
The study about Machakos controverted Malthus and its pessimistic views about population growth
Machakos didn’t go into feed deficit
Machakos’ population didn’t stop growing dramatically
The study about Machakos supported Boserup by concluding that increasing population density has had positive effects
However, Machakos still doesn’t grow enough food to feed its population. Some poorer families have not benefited from Machakos’ economic growth
Intensification can worsen problems such as biodiversity and water pollution
There is some concern as to whether Machakos is an exception
There are countless instances where fast-growing farming communities have not been innovative enough and are suffering as a result
The conclusion is that there is no single recipe for success!
We have to take into account different factors to know if populations are successful in coping with their population growth
Examples:
China
Intensification has supported extensive population growth + urbanization
This has led to the abandonment and revegetation of less fertile lands
The problem with the one-child policy
Africa
Sahel: extra greenery
Boosted by policy changes: giving farmers ownership of trees that grow on their land + some technical assistance
The extra greenery is helping poor farmer communities to be more resilient to droughts and economic setbacks
Forests of South and Central America support both these Malthusian and Boserupian views in the deforestation problem
Depends on local circumstances
Machakos
A symbol that rapid population growth is not a recipe for disaster and can even bring benefits
Emphasizes the importance of culture, socioeconomics, and biology
Boomsters: believe that there are potential benefits of reproduction
Impact of population growth in the world’s drylands
World’s drylands: Africa, Asia, Latin America
Many see a crisis looming
Others see some hope for a transition to more sustainable livelihoods
Boserupian hypothesis
According to Boserup, underpopulation is a barrier to development
Population growth could trigger intensification, which is the use of new technologies and more labor to get bigger harvests from less land
She argues that dry areas might not have a fixed carrying capacity because, with more labor, these dry areas could be able to sustain more people over time
Dryland farmers could be counted on to invest in and take care of their land as a solution to natural resource damage
The study about Machakos controverted Malthus and its pessimistic views about population growth
Machakos didn’t go into feed deficit
Machakos’ population didn’t stop growing dramatically
The study about Machakos supported Boserup by concluding that increasing population density has had positive effects
However, Machakos still doesn’t grow enough food to feed its population. Some poorer families have not benefited from Machakos’ economic growth
Intensification can worsen problems such as biodiversity and water pollution
There is some concern as to whether Machakos is an exception
There are countless instances where fast-growing farming communities have not been innovative enough and are suffering as a result
The conclusion is that there is no single recipe for success!
We have to take into account different factors to know if populations are successful in coping with their population growth
Examples:
China
Intensification has supported extensive population growth + urbanization
This has led to the abandonment and revegetation of less fertile lands
The problem with the one-child policy
Africa
Sahel: extra greenery
Boosted by policy changes: giving farmers ownership of trees that grow on their land + some technical assistance
The extra greenery is helping poor farmer communities to be more resilient to droughts and economic setbacks
Forests of South and Central America support both these Malthusian and Boserupian views in the deforestation problem
Depends on local circumstances