knowt logo

Malakoff 2011, Are More People Necessarily a Problem

  • Machakos

    • A symbol that rapid population growth is not a recipe for disaster and can even bring benefits

  • Emphasizes the importance of culture, socioeconomics, and biology

Doomsters and boomsters

  • Boomsters: believe that there are potential benefits of reproduction

  • Impact of population growth in the world’s drylands

    • World’s drylands: Africa, Asia, Latin America

      • Many see a crisis looming

      • Others see some hope for a transition to more sustainable livelihoods

  • Boserupian hypothesis

    • According to Boserup, underpopulation is a barrier to development

    • Population growth could trigger intensification, which is the use of new technologies and more labor to get bigger harvests from less land

    • She argues that dry areas might not have a fixed carrying capacity because, with more labor, these dry areas could be able to sustain more people over time

    • Dryland farmers could be counted on to invest in and take care of their land as a solution to natural resource damage

Malthus controverted?

  • The study about Machakos controverted Malthus and its pessimistic views about population growth

    • Machakos didn’t go into feed deficit

    • Machakos’ population didn’t stop growing dramatically

  • The study about Machakos supported Boserup by concluding that increasing population density has had positive effects

  • However, Machakos still doesn’t grow enough food to feed its population. Some poorer families have not benefited from Machakos’ economic growth

  • Intensification can worsen problems such as biodiversity and water pollution

  • There is some concern as to whether Machakos is an exception

    • There are countless instances where fast-growing farming communities have not been innovative enough and are suffering as a result

  • The conclusion is that there is no single recipe for success!

    • We have to take into account different factors to know if populations are successful in coping with their population growth

  • Examples:

    • China

      • Intensification has supported extensive population growth + urbanization

      • This has led to the abandonment and revegetation of less fertile lands

      • The problem with the one-child policy

    • Africa

      • Sahel: extra greenery

        • Boosted by policy changes: giving farmers ownership of trees that grow on their land + some technical assistance

        • The extra greenery is helping poor farmer communities to be more resilient to droughts and economic setbacks

  • Forests of South and Central America support both these Malthusian and Boserupian views in the deforestation problem

    • Depends on local circumstances

Malakoff 2011, Are More People Necessarily a Problem

  • Machakos

    • A symbol that rapid population growth is not a recipe for disaster and can even bring benefits

  • Emphasizes the importance of culture, socioeconomics, and biology

Doomsters and boomsters

  • Boomsters: believe that there are potential benefits of reproduction

  • Impact of population growth in the world’s drylands

    • World’s drylands: Africa, Asia, Latin America

      • Many see a crisis looming

      • Others see some hope for a transition to more sustainable livelihoods

  • Boserupian hypothesis

    • According to Boserup, underpopulation is a barrier to development

    • Population growth could trigger intensification, which is the use of new technologies and more labor to get bigger harvests from less land

    • She argues that dry areas might not have a fixed carrying capacity because, with more labor, these dry areas could be able to sustain more people over time

    • Dryland farmers could be counted on to invest in and take care of their land as a solution to natural resource damage

Malthus controverted?

  • The study about Machakos controverted Malthus and its pessimistic views about population growth

    • Machakos didn’t go into feed deficit

    • Machakos’ population didn’t stop growing dramatically

  • The study about Machakos supported Boserup by concluding that increasing population density has had positive effects

  • However, Machakos still doesn’t grow enough food to feed its population. Some poorer families have not benefited from Machakos’ economic growth

  • Intensification can worsen problems such as biodiversity and water pollution

  • There is some concern as to whether Machakos is an exception

    • There are countless instances where fast-growing farming communities have not been innovative enough and are suffering as a result

  • The conclusion is that there is no single recipe for success!

    • We have to take into account different factors to know if populations are successful in coping with their population growth

  • Examples:

    • China

      • Intensification has supported extensive population growth + urbanization

      • This has led to the abandonment and revegetation of less fertile lands

      • The problem with the one-child policy

    • Africa

      • Sahel: extra greenery

        • Boosted by policy changes: giving farmers ownership of trees that grow on their land + some technical assistance

        • The extra greenery is helping poor farmer communities to be more resilient to droughts and economic setbacks

  • Forests of South and Central America support both these Malthusian and Boserupian views in the deforestation problem

    • Depends on local circumstances

robot