EnglApp Reviewer 3rd Qtr

Pakisabi nalang po if ever may corrections. Review well & Good luck - reg

1. Relevance of the Source to the Research Topic
2. Authority/Author's Qualifications
3. Currency/Date of Publication
4. Content/Accuracy of Information
5. Location of Sources

5 Criteria in Evaluating Sources

Relevance of the Source to the Research Topic

\- is the relation of the material to the matter or topic at hand

Authority/Author's Qualifications

\- the source from which the citation is drawn

\- determines whether the author has the qualification or proper background to be considered as a credible source for the topic

Currency/Date of Publication

\- the quality or state of the text being current

Content/Accuracy of Information

\- the topics or matter treated in a written work

Location of Sources

\- whether the material is digital or in print

Five

\- As much as possible, the date of publication should be at most --- years earlier.

blogs or personal homepages, wiki sites

\- Avoid using sources like --- and ---

Top-level domain

(URL)

.edu (academic institution – university)

Common URLs

(URL)

.gov (government), .org (organization), .com (commercial sites), and .net (network infrastructures)

1. .edu
2. .gov
3. .org
4. .net

4 Reputable URLS

Reaction Papers, Reviews, and Critiques

\- Advanced and specialized forms of writing in which a reviewer or reader evaluates different works

\- Not merely summaries, they are critical assessments, analyses, or evaluations of different literary works.

250-750 words

\- The length of Reaction Papers, Reviews, and Critiques usually ranges from ---

Reaction Papers, Reviews, and Critiques

\- Require skills of critical thinking and recognizing arguments

\- the term "critique" in this context is not connected to cynicism and pessimism.

Reviewers

\- They do not rely on mere opinions, rather, they use both proof and logical reasoning to justify and

\- Support their comments

\- Process ideas and theories

Reviewers

\- They all critically evaluate various work

\- their difference relies on the evaluation's level of complexity and comprehensiveness.

1. scholarly work
2. work of art
3. designs
4. graphic designs

Things One May Critique

Reaction Paper

\- elementary level reaction towards something

Review Paper

\- ideas are slightly on the next level of critical thinking

\- opinions and facts are balanced

\- contains a more matured outlook

\- write-ups of journalists or columnists

Critique Paper

\- most academic in nature among the three

\- Senior high school, college, and graduate school students

\- few personal opinions, more logical reasonings/justification

\- facts are supported by sources

1. Introduction
2. Summary
3. Critique
4. Conclusion

Structure of Critiques of Scholarly Books and Articles

Introduction

\- takes up around 5% of the paper

\

Introduction

\- contains the title of the book/article/work

\- houses the writer's name

\- includes the thesis statement

\- all of these can be written in no particular order

Summary

\- takes up about 10% of the paper

Summary

\- contains the objective or purpose of the work

\- details the methods used (if applicable)

\- includes the major findings, claims, ideas, or messages

Critique

\- occupies around 75% of the paper

10%

\- The Conclusion occupies --- of the paper

Conclusion

\- contains the overall impression of the work

\- states the benefits of the work for the intended audience or field

\- includes suggestions to improve the work based on the evaluation