Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
DEFINITION OF LAW - POSITIVE AND NATURAL LAW
a set of rules that regulate society in order to maintain order and live in peace
PL: current law applied in your country, enforced by current authorities
NL: certain moral principles are inherent in human nature and can be understood through reason
CONSTITUENT POWER
people who are involved in the making of the constitution, important because they have the power to ratify.
Constitution is derived from the people, because people are sovereign
CONSTITUTION IN A NARROW SENSE
the document itself (Capital C)
constitution IN A BROAD SENSE
laws that include the electoral code, powers, rights of citizens, responsibilities, obligations, and relationships between the citizens and the powers
WRITTEN CONSTITUTION AND WORKING CONSTITUTION
WR C- the document and the amendments
WO C- constitution that is dynamic, flexible, and adapted
PREAMBLE, EXAMPLES
contains who is the sovereign of the country
“We the people”
“The French People”
“The Spanish Nation”
SOVEREIGN- DEFINITION ORIGIN
sovereignty is the highest power over the citizens who must obey the law, the ultimate power to rule a country- french jurist Jean Bodain
DIMENSIONS OF SOVEREIGNTY
AD Extra- a country can demonstrate they have power internationally 1. People 2. Territory 3. Power
AD Intra: how the country distributes its power within the country, who holds power
PEOPLE ARE SOVERIGN WITHIN THE COUNTRY
ROYAL SOVEREIGNTY
When kings/queens have all the power
When king was sovereign, the people did not have a constitution under ancient regimes
PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY
the parliament is the highest source of power, can make any law
Parliament always has the last say- not legally bound by referenda
STATE SOVEREIGNTY
concept that a state has the full right to govern itself without interference from outside authorities
NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY
the nation has sovereignty, nation can refer to representatives, tries to highlight the representatives rather than the people
if a nation is sovereign, people don’t get the last say, government is not bound by referenda
POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY
the electorate- people would vote for elections and for political decisions, amending the constitution, referendum (Example of when people are sovereign)
ABSENCE OF SOVEREIGNTY
constitution does not say who is the sovereign, but does not mean that there is no sovereignty
Ex. The Netherlands, the sovereign is the people
CONSTITUTION MAKING IN U.S.
• Adopted in 1789 and amended 27 times
•Activists against british parliament whose efforts in fighting for independence led to the creation of the U.S. Constitution to establish a new system of self-governance.
• Continental Congress in Philadelphia
• Ratified by 11 states at first
• 3 Founding documents:
- Declaration of Independence 1776
- US Constitution 1789
- Bill of Rights 1791
• Ratified by state conventions
CONSTITUTION MAKING IN FRANCE
The 15th Constitution in France
DeGaulle wanted the constitution be rewritten to strengthen the executive branch
Debre led a committee to draft the new constitution
the constitution was ratified by the people, which proved its legitimacy
CONSTITUTION MAKING IN GERMANY
drafted by founding fathers and ratified by two-thirds of the members of parliament, specifically the Bundestag and the Bundesrat
May 23rd 1949- The German Basic Law was adopted
Never ratified by the people but still legitimate- drafters claim to represent the people/diversity of the country, the draft is negotiated publicly, and it is socially accepted
CONSTITUTION MAKING IN SPAIN
1978 Spanish Constitution
After Franco died- Juan Carlos brought democracy to spain
established a parliamentary system of government, where the General Courts hold legislative power
Politicians drafted the constitution, and the people ratified it on 6 December- legitimate
CONTENT OF CONSTITUTIONS
Preamble
Institutional Part- map of powers
Dogmatic parts- list of rights and liberties
Vertical distribution of power- states, counties
Procedural- how the constitution can be amended
KINDS OF AMENDMENTS
- Rigid Amendments: Hard to change, requiring supermajorities, referendums, or multiple steps.
- Example: US Constitution requires 2/3 Congress + 3/4 state ratification.
- Flexible Amendments: Easier to modify, done through ordinary legislative procedures or minimal extra steps.
- Example: UK Constitution can be changed by parliamentary acts with simple majority
REQUIREMENTS THAT YOU CAN FIND IN THE RIGID PROCEDURES ( SUPERMAJORITIES, REFERENDUM…)
1. Supermajorities: Requires a higher-than-usual majority in legislative bodies.
2. 2 parliamentary readings of amendment with new elections between readings- amendment bill: parliament votes to pass the bill twice, can call for dissolution of the parliament
3. Ratification: of the bill by referendum (people) AND regions
4. Time Delays/cool off period: time for reflection/deliberation between lawmakers
ETERNITY CLAUSES
parts of the constitution that cannot be amended
KIND OF MAJORITIES
Relative Majority- only requires more yes than no’s to win
Absolute Majority- requires 50% of the people, +1 more vote
Supermajority- anything more than 50% 2/3, 3/5, 3/4
Unanimity- 100%
TYPES OF VOTES/BALLOTS
CONSEQUENCES OF CASTING THE DIFFERENT TYPE OF VOTES
Valid: submitted by eligible voter, free from errors, follows the voting process
Blank: way for voters to participate in the election without endorsing any candidate or option
expression of discontent, do not contribute to election, impacts turnout stats, assess public sentiment
Void: doesn’t count
Doesn’t count, wasted vote, voter discontent, compromises election integrity
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROCEDURE IN US
Initiative: U.S. Congress- 2/3 both houses and 2/3 of the states
Process: ¾ of all states, 2/3 HOR, 2/3 Senate (double supermajority)
Limitations: no referendum, and no eternity clauses in U.S. Con, entire constitution can be amended
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROCEDURE IN UK
Flexible System:
Parliamentary Sovereignty: Parliament can amend or repeal laws, including constitutional ones, by passing an Act of Parliament
Legislative Process: Most amendments are made through ordinary legislation.
Referendums: While not legally binding, referendums can be used for significant constitutional changes
Conventions: Political practices can evolve, influencing constitutional arrangements without formal amendments.
Judicial Interpretation: Courts can interpret laws, impacting how constitutional principles are applied.
Limitations: public approval,
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROCEDURE IN GERMANY
Initiative: any public institution in the country
Process: 2/3 of the members of parliament
Bundestag: 736 Seats
Bundesrat: 69 Seats
Limitations:
Protect the territorial division in Länder
Participation of Länder in Federal legislation
Germany is a federal, social, legal, republican state
Article 1-18: Fundamental rights
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROCEDURE IN FRANCE
Initiative: President upon any recommendation of the Prime Minister or any Member of Parliament
Process:
MoP Request: absolute majority in both houses and referendum
PM Request: 3/5 majority of 2 houses in joint session
Limitations:
Material: the government will always be republic
Temporal: no amendment can be made when the integrity of national territory is in jeopardy
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROCEDURE IN SPAIN
Initiative: Government, Congress, Senate, and Parliaments of the autonomous communities
Process: Ordinary and Extraordinary procedures
Ordinary:
- 1st round 3/5 majority of both houses
- IF NOT- 2nd vote: 2/3 of congress and absolute majority in the senate
- Referendum if requested by 10% of one house
Extraordinary: The entire Constitution, Preliminary Chapter, Fundamental Rights, The Crown
- 2/3 majority in both houses
- dissolution of parliament
- New Elections
- 2/3 Majority newly elected parliament
- Referendum
Limitations: No material limitations, Temporal- war time/ state of emergency
CONSTITUTIONAL SUPREMACY: NOTION
Nobody is above the constitution, no rule is above the the constitution
Limited Government: Constitutional supremacy ensures that the government's power is limited and that it operates within the bounds set by the constitution.
Effectiveness: It ensures that the constitution is effective in protecting individual rights and limiting government power.
Fundamental Law: It establishes the constitution as the fundamental law of the land, serving as the foundation for all other laws.
Consequences
Parliament cannot pass laws that violate the constitution: This restriction ensures that all laws are in accordance with the constitution's principles.
Laws that contradict the constitution are declared unconstitutional: Such laws are removed from the legal system, upholding the supremacy of the constitution.
PARLIAMENTARY SUPREMACY: NOTION
Acts of Parliament are the highest law of the land.
Thus, there is no public authority that may invalidate Acts of Parliament.
Consequences
the balance of power between Parliament and other branches of government, as well as the protection of fundamental rights.
For example, in a system with constitutional supremacy, a court can strike down a law passed by Parliament if it violates the constitution. However, in a system with parliamentary supremacy, the courts have no such power.
SOURCES OF UK CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Statutes- made by parliament
Customary rules- deals with relationship between king and parliament, i.e. king’s duties
Case law- legal precedents established by judges through court decisions
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE UK CONSTITUTION
Flexible: can evolve and adapt to reflect societal change
Parliamentary supremacy means that the parliament can enact and amend laws quickly
Lack of clarity, difficult to ascertain responsibilities and constitutional rights, disputes about interpretation of unwritten conventions
Weak protection of fundamental rights