1/281
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Psychology
scientific investigation of mental processes (thinking, remembering and feeling) and behaviour
main question of social psychology
How does the social environment influence the way people think, feel and behave?
main question of developmental psych
How do people grow, change, and learn across the early stages of life?
main question of personality psych
Are there stable personality traits that determine people's behaviours across time and different situations?
social psych definition
scientific study of how we think about, influence, and relate to one another
1st social psych experiment
triplett 1898, (examines social facilitation) cyclists ride faster together than alone
40 kids play game (turning in fishing wheel) alone vs in pairs pairs was faster
social facilitation
a psychological phenomenon where the presence of others improves individual performance on a task.
three levels of social psych
- Social influence between individuals
- Relationship between oneself and others
- Individual and the group, between groups and between society and the individual
history of social psych
Prominent researchers who have contributed to psychology held racist attitudes and directly contributed to the subjugation of racial minorities; like Sir Francis Galton
Sir Francis Galton
Developed correlation and regression, which are widely used today in psychology, and coined the term & concept of eugenics.
Eugenics
A concept that formed the basis of racial violence, including forced sterilization in the U.S. and the Holocaust in Nazi Germany.
replication crisis
Many classical findings weren't replicating (same studies, different effect).
w.e.i.r.d samples
research participants from Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic backgrounds
what is good scientific evidence
-Observation
-Qualitative
-Quantitative
-Experimental designs
-Longitudinal
-Field Experiments
empiricism
the view that knowledge originates in experience and that science should, therefore, rely on observation and experimentation
Blindness of Empiricism
A concept in psychology that refers to the limitations of relying solely on empirical evidence without considering other factors.
central tenet of empiricism
The belief that the scientist should be a neutral observer, detached from the world to create knowledge.
social influence and social psych questions
Why do we conform and obey? When are we persuaded? How do we know our views are correct?
What are the classic conformity and obedience studies?
-Social norms (Sherif autokenetic studies briefly)
-Conformity (& Non-Conformity; Asch line studies)
-Normative vs. Informational influence (Deutsch & Gerard, Turner)
-Obedience (Milgram Studies - briefly - in Lab 1)
-Power of situational roles (Zimbardo Prison Study, BBC Prison Study)
social influence definition
the processes through which people agree or disagree about what kinds of behaviours are appropriate, It is the process through which social norms are formed, maintained or changed
Muzafer Sherif
A psychologist known for his work on social norms and the autokinetic effect.
Autokinetic Effect
An optical illusion where a stationary point of light appears to move in a dark room.
sherif's definition of norms
Norms are social uniformities which arise from processes of mutual influence between group members (e.g., socialisation, culture, localised networks/groups)
according to sherif, what do norms do
-Endorsed by group members ("right thing to do")
-Describe appropriate behaviour (descriptive)
-Expected by group members (prescriptive)
-"Oughtness" - obligation, duty
-Express social values (what is 'good')
significance of autokinetic studies
-Norms as social products established through interaction of individuals and that continued to have meaning and influence outside of the setting of initial norm formation (sticking to group value)
-Groups established own "mean and range" and the norm affected the group as a whole (Conformity)
-Norm not the sum of individual responses but a 'group product'
- long-term effects
Sherif's Autokinetic Studies
Experiments conducted in 1935 and 1937 that demonstrated the formation of social norms through group influence.
issues of autokinetic studies
-there was no correct answer
-Was it easier for social norms (and conformity to norms) to happen because the movement of the light was an optical illusion - the light really did not move?
-What would happen if there was a correct response?
-Would there be conformity in groups if the right answer is obvious?
Conformity
A tendency for people to change their perceptions, opinions and behaviour in ways that are consistent with group norms
Asch's Line Experiments
Studies that investigated the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform.
why did people conform in asch's line experiment
-Group size (the larger the group, the more conformity)
-Group is unanimous (everyone agrees)
-Admire the group's status and attractiveness - (we want to belong)
-Behaviour is visible to others in the group (public)
-Socialised by a culture that encourages respect for social norms and discourages non-normative behaviour
significance of asch's line experiment
-Often results are used to argue that people will go along with the majority in a sheep-like unthinking way, people can turn their backs on reality and truth, there is a "dark side of humanity" - that we will go along with others even when we know it is 'wrong' (herd mentality, group mind, tribalism)
-BUT... a closer look shows participants are actively trying to make sense of situation (not passive and sheep-like) and not 'unthinking'
reality testing
Social reality testing (looking to other people) used when what to do is 'unclear' and physical reality testing (using our own sensors - eyes, ears, touch) is not possible
why did people not use reality testing in asch's line experiments when it was possible to
Deutsch & Gerard (1955) - maybe there are two reality testing processes rather than one: Normative vs. Informational Influence
informational influence
process where individuals change their beliefs or behaviors based on the perception that others have more accurate information, especially in ambiguous situations
what is informational influence similar to
social reality testing - turn to others with relevant knowledge, expertise, etc
normative influence
conformity based on a person's desire to fulfill others' expectations, often to gain acceptance and avoid rejection, compliance despite private disagreement
what is normative influence similar to
ideas of 'peer-group pressure' and 'negative' influence of social groups
what does informational influence lead to
our desire to be right -> private conformity (which is real)
private conformity
our perceptions are changed by the groups influence (from informational influence)
what does normative influence lead to
conseuences of appearing deviant -> public compliance (which is strategic)
public compliance
expressed only publicly
Why do people privately conform?
we need to be certain in the correctness of our actions in an ambiguous and uncertain situation so we look to others to shape our own response -> over time we internalise it
milgrams shock experiments
a 1960s series of studies to measure obedience to authority, showing that 65% of participants would administer the maximum 450-volt "shock" to a learner, despite the victim's distress and their own personal conscience
significance of milgrims shock experiments
Milgram reveals the importance of "others" - we will obey legitimate authority figures (holocaust)
stanford prison experiment
healthy male college students randomly assigned roles as guards or prisoners in a mock prison. The study was intended to last two weeks but was terminated after six days due to the guards' escalating abusive behavior and the prisoners' extreme emotional distress and submissiveness, highlighting the powerful influence of social situations on individual behavior
the aim of the stanford prison experiment
study of what happens when a powerful authority figure (Zimbardo) has influence in establishing oppressive group norms. (leadership and group norms)
bbc prison experiment (2002)
documentary experiment that randomly assigned men to the roles of "prisoners" and "guards" in a simulated prison setting for eight days. Unlike the earlier Stanford Prison Experiment, this study found that prisoners developed a stronger sense of shared identity and challenged the guards' authority, leading to a system where prisoners eventually overcame the guards and established an egalitarian structure.
significance of prison studies
highlighted the (potential) power of the environment/situation/role/norms...
BUT, behaviour not simply due to situation/role
-Psychological connection to the role/group matters - social identification may be important for 'collective action/power' in the prison
-Lack of effective leadership or a functioning system can lead to tyranny (more control of system)
Zimbardo Prison Study
An experiment that investigated the psychological effects of perceived power, focusing on the struggle between prisoners and prison officers.
Descriptive Norms
Norms that describe what is typically done in a given situation.
Prescriptive Norms
Norms that specify what ought to be done in a given situation.
Stereotyping
A cognitive process that involves assigning characteristics to individuals based on their group membership.
Prejudice
An unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason, often directed towards a group.
Discrimination
The unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people, often based on race, age, or sex.
socio-cultural approaches to prejudice
stereotyping and prejudice and group conflict based on the idea that the origins emerge based on relations between groups
Realistic Conflict Theory
A theory that argues prejudice and intergroup aggression are caused primarily by competition for scarce resources.
who developed realistic conflict theory
sherif
Boys' Camp Studies
Field experiments conducted in the 1950s that examined group dynamics and intergroup conflict among middle-class Caucasian boys.
Mutually Exclusive Goals
Goals that cannot be achieved simultaneously by different groups, that reduces conflict
prejudice from an intergroup perspective
"Prejudice" as an intergroup attitude is meaningful and functional, it follows people's understanding of the intergroup relationship (co-operative or conflictual).
critique of socio-cultural approaches
-Stereotypes (and prejudice) emerge and shift based on context
-Approach more descriptive than explanatory (it doesn't tell us much about what was going on in people's heads)
-Analysis of psychological process remains unclear
-Solutions realistic?
Contextual Shifts in Stereotypes
The idea that stereotypes and prejudices can change based on the social context.
Ethnocentrism
The belief in the superiority of one's own ethnic group, often resulting in prejudice against other groups.
Psychodynamic Theories
Theories that suggest personality and behavior are influenced by unconscious motives and conflicts.
Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis
Aggression (and prejudice) arises when goal pursuit is blocked; aggression displaced onto less powerful outgroups ('scapegoating').
critique of Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis
-Difficult to predict the target of aggression
-Frustration neither necessary nor sufficient to cause aggression
Miller & Bugelski Experiment
An experiment that showed participants who experienced frustration developed more negative attitudes towards minority groups.
Berkowitz's Reformulation
A refinement of the frustration-aggression hypothesis that examines the conditions under which frustration leads to aggression; the perception of deprivation is more important than actual deprivation.
prejudiced personality
A personality type characterized by rejection of outgroups, often linked to early harsh experiences and insecurity
authoritarian personality
A personality syndrome proposed to be related to prejudice, characterized by rigid adherence to conventional values.
prejudiced personality comes from
-punitive and harsh early life experiences
-Insecurity
-Fearfulness
-Inability to cope with inner tensions or conflicts
-Inability to cope with uncertainty, change and ambiguity in the external world
Tolerant Personality
A personality type resulting from permissive parenting, characterized by security, maturity, and inner confidence.
tolerant personality comes from
-permissive parenting and unconditional acceptance
-Security
-Maturity
-qInner confidence and ability to cope with threat and uncertainty
Authoritarian Personality
A personality characterized by rigid adherence to values, submission to authority, and generalized hostility.
authoritarian personality is characterized by
-rigid adherence to conventional values
-an exaggerated need to submit to, and identify with, strong authority
-anti-intraception (dislike for sensitivity or tender-mindedness)
-generalized hostility
-a mystical, superstitious cast of mind
-stereotyped thinking and a tendency to represent the world as 'black and white'
Right-Wing Authoritarianism
A personality construct with three dimensions: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism.
authoritarian submission
high degree of submission to legitimate authority
Authoritarian aggression
General aggressiveness towards various groups seen to be encouraged by the social or political order of the day
conventionalism
High adherence to social conventions as endorsed by society or established authority
example of right-wing authoritarianism
"Our country will be great if we honour the ways of our forefathers, do what the authorities tell us to do, and get rid of the 'rotten apples' who are ruining everything."
Criticisms of RWA
Overfocus on personality misses collective/institutional prejudice and left/right spectrum nuances.
Field Studies on Aggression
Research showing that external factors like heat can influence the likelihood of aggressive behavior.
Sherif's studies indicate
even normal individuals can develop prejudicial beliefs in certain social situations.
Critique of Psycho-Dynamic/Personality Approaches
Criticism of theories that do not account for social norms or intergroup cooperation.
Cognitive limitations
The human mind has limited cognitive capacity, leading to oversimplification in social judgments.
Cognitive miser
The tendency to conserve cognitive resources by relying on mental shortcuts and generalizations.
stereotyping according to cognitive miser
Stereotyping is part of 'normal' or universal cognitive processes rather than 'abnormal' personalities and help us to understand what to expect from our surroundings - including other people
fiske and taylor 1984
View of humans as faulty information-processing devices; perception errors seen as result of limited processing capacity so people often forced to make decisions that are quick and easy (often wrong), rather than ones that are time-consuming and onerous (more often right)
Attributional errors
Mistakes in judgment due to a lack of mental resources to consider all factors involved.
critiques of the cognitive approach
-neglects the role that group membership and intergroup relations play in stereotyping
-Too focused on the potential need to save cognitive resources (e.g., attention)
-downplays the social and political aspects of stereotypes/prejudice: as expressions of group status, ideology and justifications of collective action
Tajfel (1969) definition of stereotypes
the attribution of general psychological characteristics to large human groups
tajfel and wilkes experiment
people assigned to blue B line exaggerated the difference between A and B and how B was similar to other B
key takeaway of tajfel and wilkes experiment
When people perceive there to be a correlation between a classification and a dimension of judgment they will 1. exaggerate the differences between the classes on that dimension 2. minimise the differences within the classes on that dimension because of stereotype accentuation
Socialization of stereotypes
The process through which stereotypes are learned and become relatively enduring.
Dominant explanations for prejudice origins
Factors such as competition over scarce resources, existing hostilities, history of negativity, and personality that contribute to group identity.
Tajfel & colleagues wanted to systematically test dominant explanations for prejudice origins
Started with the baseline condition of forming two groups, minimal group studies shown some paintings, which one do you prefer, randomly assigned to groups assigned money after give more money to members of ingroup
Generalizations in social impressions
The tendency to form impressions of groups rather than individuals to avoid cognitive overload.
Key takeaway from Tajfel's experiment
When people perceive a correlation between classification and social identity, they exaggerate differences between classes and minimize differences within classes.
Social Identity
That part of the self-concept corresponding to our group membership together with the value and emotional significance attached to that group membership.
Positive Distinctiveness
Motivation for the ingroup to be 'positively distinct' from the outgroup, us in comparison to them