The Criminal Trial Process

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

12 Terms

1
New cards

Complete Defences Discretion

  1. Defence of mental illness

    • Cy Walsh not guilty of father's murder due to mental incompetence The guardian 2016

      • “Evidence gathered by police and reports from forensic psychiatrists.”

      • “detained for some time at Adelaide’s secure mental health facility” The guardian 2016

  2. Defence of Automatism

    • Security guard acquitted of murder ABC 2006

      • “The jury heard Ms Brown was suffering from automatism” ABC 2006

    • Guards Mother

      • "We consider the right decision has been made because”

      • “she's incapable of doing what she was accused of."

  3. Defence of consent for SA charges

    • BOCSAR revised jan 2025

      • “around 85% of sexual assault incidents had no legal action taken”

      • “where criminal proceedings were commenced, less than half of the accused were subsequently found guilty”

2
New cards

Complete Defences Values and Ethics

  1. Defence of mental illness

    • Cy Walsh not guilty of father's murder due to mental incompetence The guardian 2016

      • “Evidence gathered by police and reports from forensic psychiatrists.”

      • “detained for some time at Adelaide’s secure mental health facility” The guardian 2016

  2. Defence of Automatism

    • Security guard acquitted of murder ABC 2006

      • “The jury heard Ms Brown was suffering from automatism” ABC 2006

    • Guards Mother

      • "We consider the right decision has been made because”

      • “she's incapable of doing what she was accused of."

  3. Defence of consent for SA charges

    • BOCSAR revised jan 2025

      • “around 85% of sexual assault incidents had no legal action taken”

      • “where criminal proceedings were commenced, less than half of the accused were subsequently found guilty”

3
New cards

Complete Defences Law Reform

  1. The NSW consent laws changed on 1 June 2022. The Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Consent Reforms) Act 2021

    • The guardian 2022

      • “The new laws require parties to give and obtain consent “at the time of the act”

  2. the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW)

    • Instead of “not guilty by reason of mental illness”, “act proven but not criminally responsible”

    • Marsdens Law Group

      • The change comes from victim calls to change the verdict, as “not guilty” undermined the offence occurring.

  3. 'A kick, three punches and a stomp': Not guilty police officer found to be acting as an automaton SMH 2017

    • “A police officer who kicked, punched and stomped on a man”

    • “not guilty of assault”

    • Prosecution failed to prove mens rea

    • “expert evidence from a neurosurgeon, a neurologist and a psychologist”

    • "automaton"

4
New cards

Complete Defences Balancing Rights

  1. Defence of mental illness

    • Cy Walsh not guilty of father's murder due to mental incompetence The guardian 2016

      • “Evidence gathered by police and reports from forensic psychiatrists.”

      • “detained for some time at Adelaide’s secure mental health facility” The guardian 2016

  2. Defence of Automatism

    • Security guard acquitted of murder ABC 2006

      • “The jury heard Ms Brown was suffering from automatism” ABC 2006

    • Guards Mother

      • "We consider the right decision has been made because”

      • “she's incapable of doing what she was accused of."

  3. Defence of consent for SA charges

    • BOCSAR revised jan 2025

      • “around 85% of sexual assault incidents had no legal action taken”

      • “where criminal proceedings were commenced, less than half of the accused were subsequently found guilty”

5
New cards

Partial Defences Discretion

  1. Provocation

    • R v Camplin (1978)

      • 15 year old boy successfully argued provocation murder charge reduced to manslaughter.

      • Uncle had sexually assaulted him and was mocking him

  2. Substantial impairment because of mental health impairment or cognitive impairment

    • “Mother who let toddler drown not guilty of murder” SMH Article 2012

      • “Diminished responsibility”

      • “on the grounds she was suffering from a depressive illness.”

  3. NSW Law Reform Comission - provocation:

    • “unfair to assess criminal liability” “to an objective standard”

    • “may pose particular problems for certain groups of offenders, such as offenders with an intellectual disability.”

6
New cards

Partial Defences morals and ethics

  1. Provocation

    • R v Camplin (1978)

      • 15 year old boy successfully argued provocation murder charge reduced to manslaughter.

      • Uncle had sexually assaulted him and was mocking him

  2. Substantial impairment because of mental health impairment or cognitive impairment

    • “Mother who let toddler drown not guilty of murder” SMH Article 2012

      • “Diminished responsibility”

      • “on the grounds she was suffering from a depressive illness.”

  3. NSW Law Reform Comission - provocation:

    • “unfair to assess criminal liability” “to an objective standard”

    • “may pose particular problems for certain groups of offenders, such as offenders with an intellectual disability.”

7
New cards

Partial Defences law reform

  1. The Crimes Amendment (Provocation) Act 2014

    • no longer is available for people to kill their partners out of jealous rage or sexual assault.

    • R v Singh case 2012

      • “convicted him of manslaughter”

      • “wife telling him she never loved him”

  2. the South Australia Parliament passed a Bill outlawing the so called “gay panic” defence to murder. 2020

    • last state to do so following QLD

    • Anna Brown, CEO of Equality Australia.

      • “working to make sure that our laws address crimes motivated by hate or prejudice,”

  3. NSW Law Reform Comission - provocation:

    • “unfair to assess criminal liability” “to an objective standard”

    • “may pose particular problems for certain groups of offenders, such as offenders with an intellectual disability.”

8
New cards

Partial Defences balancing rights

  1. Provocation

    • R v Camplin (1978)

      • 15 year old boy successfully argued provocation murder charge reduced to manslaughter.

      • Uncle had sexually assaulted him and was mocking him

  2. Substantial impairment because of mental health impairment or cognitive impairment

    • “Mother who let toddler drown not guilty of murder” SMH Article 2012

      • “Diminished responsibility”

      • “on the grounds she was suffering from a depressive illness.”

  3. NSW Law Reform Comission - provocation:

    • “unfair to assess criminal liability” “to an objective standard”

    • “may pose particular problems for certain groups of offenders, such as offenders with an intellectual disability.”

9
New cards

Juries Discretion

  1. Jury amendment (Verdicts) Act 2006 (NSW)

    • “to allow the decision of 11 out of 12 jurors or 10 out of 11 jurors to be returned as a majority verdict”

  2. “Former Sydney swim coach and MasterChef contestant guilty of sexually abusing 11 children” The Guardian 2023

    • “Jury found him guilty on all counts”

    • the judge said she would take a majority verdict.

    • VCAL spokesman

      • “spare some victims the ordeal of having to give evidence at retrials.”

  3. “Drug trial abandoned after jurors play Sudoku” ABC 2008

    • “a juror admitted she and four others had been playing Sudoku while evidence was being heard.”

    • NSW Council of Civil Liberties vice-president

      • “it is essential that jurors listen”

10
New cards

Juries morals and ethics

  1. Jury amendment (Verdicts) Act 2006 (NSW)

    • “to allow the decision of 11 out of 12 jurors or 10 out of 11 jurors to be returned as a majority verdict”

  2. “Former Sydney swim coach and MasterChef contestant guilty of sexually abusing 11 children” The Guardian 2023

    • “Jury found him guilty on all counts”

    • the judge said she would take a majority verdict.

    • VCAL spokesman

      • “spare some victims the ordeal of having to give evidence at retrials.”

  3. “Drug trial abandoned after jurors play Sudoku” ABC 2008

    • “a juror admitted she and four others had been playing Sudoku while evidence was being heard.”

    • NSW Council of Civil Liberties vice-president

      • “it is essential that jurors listen”

11
New cards

Juries Law Reform

  1. Jury amendment (Verdicts) Act 2006 (NSW)

    • “to allow the decision of 11 out of 12 jurors or 10 out of 11 jurors to be returned as a majority verdict”

  2. In the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Consent Reforms) Act 2021

    • “improve juror understanding of the complexities of sexual offending and reporting”

  3. NSW Government’s Jury Amendment Bill 2023

    • a proposal to reduce time before a jury can be excused from delivering a unanimous verdict

    • President of the Law Society of NSW Brett McGrath

      • “reduces an important safeguard for majority verdicts”

      • “represents an erosion of the importance of the jury’s role in our justice system”

12
New cards

Juries Balancing rights

  1. Jury amendment (Verdicts) Act 2006 (NSW)

    • “to allow the decision of 11 out of 12 jurors or 10 out of 11 jurors to be returned as a majority verdict”

  2. “Former Sydney swim coach and MasterChef contestant guilty of sexually abusing 11 children” The Guardian 2023

    • “Jury found him guilty on all counts”

    • the judge said she would take a majority verdict.

    • VCAL spokesman

      • “spare some victims the ordeal of having to give evidence at retrials.”

  3. “Drug trial abandoned after jurors play Sudoku” ABC 2008

    • “a juror admitted she and four others had been playing Sudoku while evidence was being heard.”

    • NSW Council of Civil Liberties vice-president

      • “it is essential that jurors listen”