1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
what is strange situation?
controlled observation designed by Mary Ainsworth that aims to measure the security of attachment that a child displays towards the caregiver
Procedure of Ainsworth Strange Situation
Original study took place on 100 MC American mothers and their children.
The observation takes place in a controlled space, with a one way mirror through which psychologists observe the infant over 8 episodes (each which lasted 3 minutes) that involve the measuring of the infants reaction to the stranger approaching/leaving and their caregiver approaching/leaving
what are the 5 behaviours used to judge attachment in infants during strange situation?
1) Proximity seeking - staying close to caregiver
2) Exploration and secure-base behaviour - if the child feels confident to explore and use their caregiver as a security base
3) Stranger anxiety - how infants display feelings of anxiety when a stranger approached
4) Separation anxiety - how infants display feelings of anxiety when their caregiver leaves
5) Reunion behaviour - infants reaction when caregiver returns after a period of separation
Findings: what were the 3 types of attachment?
Ainsworth found that there were 3 key patterns in which infants generally behaved. She concluded that these were the 3 types of attachment:
Type B: Secure attachments (60%)
Type A: Insecure avoidant (30%)
Type C: Insecure resistant (10%)
Type B: Secure attachment
60%
-Cooperative interactions with their caregiver
-Explore happily but regularly go back to their security base
-Show mild distress during separation and accept comfort from their caregiver in reunion stage
Type A: Insecure Avoidant
30%
-Explore freely and avoid interaction intimacy with others
-Don’t seek proximity or show security base
-Little reaction when caregiver leaves or returns
-Free to interact with strangers and shows little stranger anxiety
Type C: Insecure resistant
10%
-Both seek and resist intimacy and social interactions
-Seek greater proximity and tend to explore less
-Extreme stranger anxiety but resist their carer when returning
Ambivalent attachment due to unsure nature of a child’s reaction
Strengths
1) Observations have high reliability:
Ainsworth found almost perfect agreement when rating exploratory behaviour of infants during the observation - with a 0.94 agreement between the raters. This is an almost unanimous agreement between observers
strength as observations such as strange situation have high inter - rater reliability, which is crucial for valid results
Weaknesses
1) Lacks representation due to culture based methodology (very western, American procedure)
Takahashi: Said test doesn’t work in japan because Japanese mothers are rarely separated from their children, and in this country leaving her child with a stranger isn’t a realistic day to day scenario
Infants were so distressed after being left along that 90% of infants had to have the separation phase stopped
since SS reflects western culture and doesn’t consider differences in rearing practices, it make SS culturally biased and not applicable to all circumstances
Therefore not suitable to judge attachments cross culturally, reducing its utility
2) Fails to account for the 4th type of attachment, therefore its incomplete
Main & Solomon: analysed over 200 SS tapes and proposed Type D attachment: insecure disorganised. This is characterised by a lack of consistent social behaviour and attachment. When dealing with stress and separation, they showed very strong attachment which was suddenly followed by avoidance or looking scared of the caregiver
Ainsworth’s findings are narrow and lack sufficient detail
3) Infants have different attachments with different caregivers
Main & Solomon: children behaved differently based on which parent they were with
SS aims to measure attachment type a child has, however, researchers claim that by focusing on 1 relationship between carer and infant gives a limited picture on a child’s attachment behaviour