Logic and Argumentation: Key Terms and Fallacies in Critical Thinking

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/34

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

35 Terms

1
New cards

Argument

A group of statements where premises support a conclusion.

2
New cards

Premise

A statement that gives support or evidence for the conclusion.

3
New cards

Conclusion

The claim an argument tries to prove.

4
New cards

Proposition/Statement

A declarative sentence that is either true or false.

5
New cards

Sentence

Any group of words with meaning — not all sentences are propositions (e.g., questions or commands).

6
New cards

Inference

The mental process of moving from premises to a conclusion.

7
New cards

Truth

A property of statements — a statement is true if it matches reality.

8
New cards

Validity

A property of arguments — valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises.

9
New cards

Valid/Invalid

Valid: If premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Invalid: The conclusion doesn't necessarily follow.

10
New cards

Soundness

An argument is sound if it's valid and has true premises.

11
New cards

Sound/Unsound

Sound: Valid + true premises. Unsound: Invalid or has at least one false premise.

12
New cards

Deductive Argument

Claims the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises.

13
New cards

Weak Inductive Argument

The conclusion probably follows but evidence is weak.

14
New cards

Strong Inductive Argument

The premises make the conclusion very probable, though not certain.

15
New cards

Syllogism

An argument with two premises and one conclusion.

16
New cards

Hypothetical Syllogism

Uses 'if...then' statements.

17
New cards

Antecedent

The 'if' part of a conditional statement.

18
New cards

Consequent

The 'then' part of a conditional statement.

19
New cards

Modus Ponens (MP)

If P → Q and P is true, then Q must be true.

20
New cards

Modus Tollens (MT)

If P → Q and ¬Q, then ¬P.

21
New cards

Pure Hypothetical Syllogism

Two conditional statements linked together (If A → B, and B → C, then A → C).

22
New cards

Affirming the Consequent (AC)

If P → Q and Q, then P (Invalid).

23
New cards

Denying the Antecedent (DA)

If P → Q and ¬P, then ¬Q (Invalid).

24
New cards

Disjunctive Syllogism

Either A or B. Not A. Therefore B.

25
New cards

Categorical Syllogism

Based on categories (All, No, Some).

26
New cards

Barbara

A valid categorical syllogism form: All A are B. All B are C. Therefore, All A are C.

27
New cards

Barbara-Type

Any syllogism that follows Barbara's logical structure.

28
New cards

Middle Term

The term that appears in both premises but not in the conclusion.

29
New cards

Fallacies

Errors in reasoning that make an argument invalid or weak.

30
New cards

Formal Fallacies

Mistakes in the logical structure or form of an argument.

31
New cards

Informal Fallacies

Errors due to content, relevance, or language, not form.

32
New cards

Vagueness vs Ambiguity

Vagueness: Meaning is unclear or blurry. Ambiguity: Word/phrase has multiple meanings.

33
New cards

Fallacies of Ambiguity

Caused by unclear or double meanings of words.

34
New cards

Fallacies of Presumption

Assume something without proper evidence.

35
New cards

Fallacies of (Ir)Relevance

Premises don't relate to the conclusion.