2. Causation and Bias

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/30

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

31 Terms

1
New cards

F ( Association =/= causation.)

T/F: Association proves causation.

<p>T/F: Association proves causation.</p>
2
New cards

F ( — statistical significance should not be mistaken for evidence of association.)

T/F: Statistical significance is evidence of association.

3
New cards

bias

What term is defined as: Any systematic (non-random) error in design, conduct, or analysis of a study that results in false association .

4
New cards

Randomization

___________ helps avoid bias.

5
New cards

- Selection bias

- Information bias

What are the 2 main categories of bias in epidemiology?

6
New cards

The grouping selection is flawed during the pre-study (design)

When during the study does selection bias occur?

7
New cards

- Non-response or loss to follow-up bias

- Exclusion bias

- Detection bias

- Self selection or referral bias

What are examples of selection bias? (4)

8
New cards

Selection bias

What type of bias is this an example of?

<p>What type of bias is this an example of?</p>
9
New cards

during the study, during data gathering (analysis phase)

When during the study does information bias occur?

10
New cards

- Misclassification bias

- Interviewer bias

- Recall bias

What are examples of information bias? (3)

11
New cards

Cofounding

What am I defining?

- A third variable that is distorting the effect that the determinant (risk factor or exposure) has on the outcome.

12
New cards

- A risk factor for the outcome

- Also associated with the determinant

- Not in the causal pathway

The confounder must have what 3 things:

13
New cards

Confounding

Warm weather (the confounder) is associated with ice cream sales and swimming where sharks live.

If I said "ice cream causes shark attacks", what may that be an example of?

14
New cards

Koch's postulates

What criteria show that one organism leads to one disease?

15
New cards

- The organism must always be observed with the disease

- The organism must be isolated and grown in pure culture in the laboratory

- The pure culture must cause the disease

- The infectious organism must be reisolated

What are Koch's postulates? (4)

16
New cards

Austin Branford Hill

Who came up with the criteria of causation?

17
New cards

- Temporal relationship

- Strength

- Dose-response relationship

- Consistency

- Plausibility

- Consideration of other explanations

- Experiment

- Specificity

- Coherence (analogy)

What are the 9 criteria of causation?

18
New cards

Exposure always preceded the outcome

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- What is mean by temporal relationship?

19
New cards

T

T/F: a temporal relationship is NECESSARY for causation

20
New cards

Strength of association (p values or RR or OR)

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- What is the weakest direct evidence of causation?

21
New cards

The size of the association:

(- Small "significant" p-values

- Large RR or OR values)

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- What is meant by the strength of association?

22
New cards

dose-response relationship

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- Which criteria is defined as :Increasing the amount of exposure consistently increases the risk (incidence of disease).

23
New cards

- Temporal relationship

- Dose-response relationship

- Consistency

- Coherence

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- What 4 things provide the strongest evidence of causation?

24
New cards

T (. This relates to consistency.)

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- T/F: One study is never enough.

25
New cards

consistent results when replicated in studies in different settings and using different methods.

(One study is NEVER enough)

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- What is meant by consistency?

26
New cards

basically, the results make sense

(The association agrees with currently accepted understanding of the pathological processes.)

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- What is meant by plausibility?

27
New cards

have taken other explanations into account and ruled them out

(Basically, playing devil's advocate and performing an honest evaluation of other evidence)

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- What is meant by consideration of other explanation?

28
New cards

The condition can be altered by an appropriate experimental regimen.

(When ethical, experimental conformation is good).

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- What is meant by experiment?

29
New cards

produces a specific effect.

(NOT common and often too simple because most diseases are often multifactorial).

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- Specificity is established when a single cause _____________

30
New cards

The association is compatible with existing knowledge.

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- What is meant by coherence?

31
New cards

Look for other studies that are different, but agree.

Hill's Criteria of Causation:

- How can you prove coherence?