1/63
Wound Bed Preparation & Interventions
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
TIME Principle
Tissue
Infection/Inflammation
Moisture Balance
Edge of Wound
T (Time Principle)
Is the tissue
Viable - choose dressing that promotes moist wound healing and fills dead space
Nonviable - choose best debridement
I (Time Principle)
Address infection, excessive colonization, and edema
M (Time Principle)
Dry - choose dressing that hydrates or promotes moisture
Excessive Moisture - choose dressing that absorbs exudate/drainage
E (Time Principle)
Healthy would edges promote healing
Negative-pressure Wound Therapy (Vacuum assisted closure)
Helps maintain moist wound, control edema, increases localized blood flow, removes exudate, reduces infectious material
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy
Patient breathes 100% O2 in chamber
Reverses tissue hypoxia and facilitates healing due to enhanced solubility in the blood
Indicated with compromised skin grafts, acute ischemia, osteomyelitis (bone infection), necrotizing infection, thermal burns, and wounds not healing due to hypoxia
Contraindicated to untreated pneumothorax and patients on antineoplastic meds
Whirlpool Therapy
Not supported for wound care
Might be used for burn care
Wound Cleansing
Removal of debris
Cleanse initially and dressing change
NaCl recommended
Topical agents to lower surface tension
Minimal mechanical force (gauze/cloth) or irrigation (squeeze bottle, pulsed lavage)
NO harsh soaps, alcohol based, or harsh antiseptics
Wound Debridement
Remove tissue that interferes with healing
Wound Dressings
Based on wound bed color, depth, and exudate
Red Wound Bed Color
Support moist wound healing and prevent trauma to granulating tissues
Yellow/Black Wound Bed Color
Indicates presence of slough or necrotic tissue and needs debridement
Wound Bed Depth
Tunneling, undermining will need to be filled
Wound Bed Exudate Production
Select dressing that promotes moist wound healing and prevents maceration
Autolytic Debridement
Selective method that results in solubilization of necrotic tissue by phagocytic cells and proteolytic/collagenolytic enzymes
Autolytic Debridement Indications
Individuals on anticoagulants
Can’t tolerate other debridement
Medically stable people
Autolytic Debridement Contraindications
Infected wounds
Immunosuppressed individuals
Dry gangrene or ischemic wounds
Enzymatic Debridement
Selective method that promotes liquefication of necrotic tissue by topical preparation
Enzymatic Debridement Indications
Moist necrotic wounds
Eschar (thick leathery scab) after cross hatching
Homebound individuals
Can’t tolerate surgical debridement
Enzymatic Debridement Contraindications
Ischemic wound ulcers
Dry gangrene
Clean, granulated wounds
Mechanical Debridement
Nonselective method removal by physical forces and may remove healthy tissue as well
Mechanical Debridement Indications
Wounds with moist necrotic tissue or foreign material present
Mechanical Debridement Contraindications
Clean granulated wounds
Sharp Debridement
Selective method using sterile instruments that removes tissue without anesthesia and little to no bleeding
Sharp Debridement Indications
Scaring and leathery eschar
Excision of moist necrotic tissue
Biofilm removal
Sharp Debridement Contraindications
Clean wounds
Advancing cellulitis when sepsis
Infection threatens life
Anticoagulant
Surgical Debridement
For deep or complicated pressure ulcer, most efficient method. Selective that might remove healthy tissue as well
Surgical Debridement Indications
Advancing cellulitis when sepsis
Infection threatens life
Clean wounds as preliminary procedure to surgical wound closure line
Granulation and scar tissue may be excised
Biofilm removal
Surgical Debridement Contraindications
Cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, diabetes
Severe spasticity
Can’t tolerate surgery
Short life expectancy
QOL not improved
Ultrasound Debridement
Selective method with long wave low frequency between 20 to 50 Hz
Ultrasound Debridement Indications
Selective removal desired
Reduces bioburden
Increase angiogenesis
Wound bed prep for graft or flap closure
Ultrasound Debridement Contraindications
Vascular abnormalities
Precautions over nerves, infections
Biological Debridement
Rare, maggots produce enzymes and phagocytize tissue and bacteria
Transparent Film Dressing
Clear adhesive permeable to O2 and moisture vapor, but impermeable to water, bacteria, and environmental contaminants
Transparent Film Dressing Indications
Stage 1 and 2 PU
Secondary dressing sometimes
Autolytic debridement
Skin donor sites
Cover for hydrophilic powder and paste preparations and hydrogels
Transparent Film Dressing Advantages
Visual evaluation of wound without removal
Impermeable to external fluids and bacteria
Transparent and comfortable
Promotes autolytic debride
Minimize friction
Hydrocolloid Dressing
Adhesive wafers containing particles that interact with wound fluid to form a gel mass over the bed
Hydrocolloid Dressing Indications
Protection of partial thickness wounds
Autolytic debride
Wounds with MILD exudate
Hydrocolloid Dressing Advantages
Moist environment
Non adhesive to healing tissue
Conformable
Impermeable to bacteria
Min to mod absorption
Waterproof, reduces pain, easy to apply, time saving, diminish friction
Hydrogel Dressing
Water based gel insoluble to water
Hydrogel Dressing Indications
Partial and full thickness wounds
Wounds with necrosis and slough
Burns and tissue damaged by radiation
Hydrogel Dressing Advantages
Soothing and cooling
Fill dead space
Rehydrate
Autolytic debride
Min to Mod absorption
Conforms, transparent to translucent, nonadherent, used when infection present
Foam Dressing
Semipermeable membranes that are either hydrophobic or hydrophilic
Foam Dressing Indications
Partial and full thickness wounds with MIN to MOD exudate
Secondary dressing for wounds with packing for more absorption
Protection and insulation
Foam Dressing Advantages
Insulates and provides padding
Non adherent and conformable
Minimal to Heavy exudate
Easy to use and for deep cavities
Alginate Dressing
Dressing derived from seaweed to react with wound exudate to form a hydrophilic gel mass over wound area
Alginate Dressing Indications
MOD to LARGE exudate
Exudate and necrotic wounds
Packing and absorption
Infected and noninfected
Alginate Dressing Advantages
Absorb up to 20x weight in exudate
Fills dead space
Supports debridement in presence of exudate
Easy to apply
Gauze Dressing
Cotton that is absorptive and permeable to water and O2
Gauze Dressing Indications
Exudative Wounds
Dead space, tunneling, or sinus tracts
Exudate and necrotic tissue
Wet to Dry - mechanical debride
Continuous Dry - heavily exudating wounds
Continuous Moist - protection of clean wounds, autolytic debride, delivery of topical needs
Gauze Dressing Advantages
Used with appropriate solutions to keep wounds moist
Infected wounds
Mechanical debridement
Cost effective for large wounds
Effective delivery if kept moist
Repositioning in Bed
Every 2 Hours
Repositioning in WC
Every 15 minutes
Transparent Film Disadvantages
Nonabsorptive
Difficult application
Channeling/wrinkling
Not to be used on wounds with fragile surrounding skin of infections
Hydrocolloid Dressing Disadvantages
Nontransparent
May change shape with heat/friction
Odor and yellow drainage on removal
Not for heavy exudate, sinus tracts, exposed bone, fragile surrounding skin
Hydrogel Dressing Disadvantages
Most require secondary dressing
Not for heavy exudate
May dry out and adhere to wound bed
May macerate surrounding skin
Foam Dressing Disadvantages
Nontransparent
Nonadherent foam requires secondary dressing
Poor comfort with deep wounds
Not for dry eschar or wounds with no exudate
Alginate Dressing Disadvantages
Require secondary dressing
Not for dry or light exudating wounds
Can dry wound bed
Gauze Dressing Disadvantages
Delayed healing if used improperly
Pain on removal
Labor intensive
Require Secondary dressing
Avoid direct contact with granulating tissue
Increase infection rate
Braden Measurement
Six-item pressure sore risk assessment scale (score range from 6-23); 18 and lower indicate progressive risk
Mild Risk 15 to 18
Mod Risk 13 to 14
High Risk 10 to 12
Very High Risk <9
Wagner Measurement
Designed to assess the depth and tissue involvement of diabetic foot ulcers
Grade 0: Intact Skin
Grade 1: Superficial Ulcer
Grade 2: Deep ulcer to tendon, fascia, ligament, joint capsule, or bone
Grade 3: Deep ulcer with abscess or osteomyelitis
Grade 4: Gangrene or portion of forefoot
Grade 5: Gangrene or major portion of foot
University of Texas Classification System
Grades
0: Epithelialized Wound
1: Superficial Wound
2: Wound penetrates to tendon or capsule
3: Wound penetrates to bone or joint
Stages
A: No infection or ischemia
B: Infection present
C: Ischemia present
D: Ischemia and infection present