Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Social Identity Theory
A person has not just one “personal self”, but also several social selves that correspond to internalized group membership
Out-Group Homogeneity
Tendency to assume that the members of other groups are very similar to each other
Social Cognitive Theory
Behavior can be learned from the environment through modeling and reinforcement
Modeling
Observing of other people’s behavior
Vicarious Reinforcement
The learning of observed reinforcement of others’ behaviors
Stereotypes
A fixed, over generalized belief about a particular group or class of people
Confirmation Bias
Tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.
Illusory Correlations
The phenomenon of perceiving a relationship between variables even when no such relationship exists
Stereotype Threat
Psychological threat that arises when one is in a situation or doing something for which a negative stereotype about one's group applies
SCT SAQ: Study
Joy, Kimball, & Zabrack (1986)
SCT SAQ: Vocab
Social Cognitive Theory, Modeling, Vicarious Reinforcement
Joy, Kimball, & Zabrack (1986): Aim
To determine the impact of television on aggressive behavior in children
Joy, Kimball, & Zabrack (1986): Methods
3 small towns in British Columbia received new TV channel, but one of them, Notel, never had TV
Observed physical and verbal aggression on the playground before and 2 years after Notel received TV
Teacher and peer ratings of aggressive behavior + viewing habits were collected as well
Joy, Kimball, & Zabrack (1986): Results
Aggressive behavior in children increased significantly in Notel but not in the other 2 towns
Due to heightened arousal in Notel children resulting from lack of familiarity with TV
Formation of Stereotypes SAQ: Study
Hamilton & Gifford (1976)
Formation of Stereotypes SAQ: Vocab
Stereotypes, Illusory Correlations, Stereotype Threat
Hamilton & Gifford (1976): Aim
To investigate the distinctiveness-based illusory correlation between undesirable behavior and minorities
Hamilton & Gifford (1976): Methods
35 males and 35 females given positive or negative statements about individuals in group A or B
Group A = 2x larger than B (26 and 13, respectively)
Participants told that Group A larger than B
Then asked to rank members of each group based on 20 traits (popular, social, intelligent, etc)
Given booklet with statements about a person → had to determine their group (A or B)
Asked how many of the statements for each group were “undesirable”
Hamilton & Gifford (1976): Results
Group A was rated higher than B for positive traits and lower than group B for negative traits
Booklet: participants correctly recalled more positive traits for group A and negative traits for group B
Researchers argued this was because the minority group = smaller = negative behaviors were more distinct and representative of the minority group