1/51
Intro to Fam Processes
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Cohesion
Feeling of emotional closeness with another person
Flexibility
The amount of change that occurs in leadership, role relationships, and relationship rules
Communication
The grease that smoothes frictions between partners and family members
Order of cohesion levels (from low to high)
Disengaged, connected, cohesive, and enmeshed
Disengaged system
Emphasis on the individual - little closeness, high independence, high separateness
Connected system
More emphasis on the individual than on the relationship
Cohesive relationship
More emphasis on togetherness and less on separateness - more dependence on one another
Enmeshed system
Emphasize togetherness - high levels of closeness, loyalty, and dependence on another
Order of flexibility levels (from low to high)
Rigid, structured, flexible, and chaotic
Rigid system
Low degree of change, leadership often authoritarian, resist change
Structured system
More moderate levels of change, with leadership sometimes shared. Discipline is democratic, roles are stable
Flexible system
More change, both relationship between the couple and family members are more democratic - role sharing
Chaotic system
Extremely high degree of change, too much change due to lack of leadership, disciple = erratic and inconsistent
The Couple and Family Map/Circumplex Model
Model offers a way of mapping and understanding couple and family relationships
Balanced families
Fit into four central categories: flexibly connected, flexibly cohesive, structurally connected, and structurally cohesive
Midrange families
Extreme on one dimension but balanced on the other
Unbalanced families
Score at extreme levels on both dimensions
Linear casualty model
There is a direct, or linear, relationship between cause and effect (usually destructive rather than productive)
Circular casualty model
One person sends out a message, which causes a change in and a response from the other person (both people deny responsibility for what has happened and for changing it and preventing it from happening again)
Verbal communication
includes both spoken and written words
Nonverbal communication
Facial expressions, eye contact, gestures and other body movements
Metacommunication
Communicating about communicating - primary way of preventing or unbinding a double bind
Self-disclosure
Individual reveals to one or more people some personal information or feelings that they could not otherwise learn
3 Basic Motives of Listeners:
To lead by persuading, to clarify by directing, and to discover by attending
Persuasive listening
Hardly listening at all - looking for an opening to jump in and control the direction of conversation
Directive listening
Involves less control than persuasive - attempts to channel or direct the conversation (usually fail to understand what’s being told)
Attentive listening
Lets speaker tell the story without interruption, encouraging rather than directing
Assertive communication
Involves the expression of thoughts, feelings, and desires as one’s right as an individual
Passive communication
Unwillingness to say what one thinks, feels, or wants
Aggressive communication
Aims to hurt or put down another persona and to protect the self-esteem of the aggressor
Communication
The way humans create and share meaning
Mixed messages
Discrepancy between the verbal and nonverbal components (receiver hears one thing but feels something else)
Double-bind
When the verbal and nonverbal messages relay information that causes some question or conflict about the relationship between the speaker and receiver
Continuous partial attention
Multitasking with communication
Assertiveness
Person’s ability to express their feelings and desires to a partner (positive)
Self-confidence
Measure of how a person feels about themselves and the ability to control things in their life
Avoidance
Person’s tendency to minimize issues and a reluctance to deal with issues directly (negative)
Partner dominance
The degree to which a person feels their partner tries to be controlling or dominant in their relationship
The hierarchy of conflict (order)
Exchange on daily events, discussion of ideas, expression of feelings, need for decision, decision making, problem solving, and crisis
Lowest three levels of hierarchy of conflict are common reasons for individuals to _______ something
discuss
The highest four levels on the hierarchy of conflict are increasing _____ and the need for a _____. An awareness of the need for decision precedes decision making - if a decision is not made there will be a _____ and eventual _____.
tension; decision; problem; crisis
_____ can take all kinds of forms and there are many things that can cause it.
Anger
True or false: Anger does NOT indicate that something is terribly wrong in a relationship. Uncontrolled/repressed anger is the issue.
True
Pursuer
Tend to want to create connected or enmeshed types of intimate relationships that are very high in cohesion
Distancer
Tend to create disengaged or separated types of intimate relationships that are low in cohesion
As the _____ moves closer, the _____ retreats, (and etc)
pursuer; distancer
Overfunctioner
Know what is best for themselves and everybody else - Low in flexibility, move in quickly to advise, difficulty showing vulnerability
Underfunctioner
People who in many areas of life just cannot seem to get organized - too high in flexibility, less competent under stress and let people step in
_______ eventually tires of saving _______/_____ tires of looking/feeling incompetent
Overfunctioner; underfunctioner; underfunctioner
Dance of anger
Harriet Goldhor Lerner’s metaphor to describe how human beings relate to each other (pursuer/distancer dance)
Blamer
Person who has a short fuse and responds in times of stress with emotionally intense feelings (fall in rigidly enmeshed category)
Estrangement
People are no longer on friendly terms