Chapter 6: Expectancy Violations Theory

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/16

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

17 Terms

1
New cards

Who developed the original Nonverbal Expectancy Violations Theory?

Judee Burgoon

2
New cards

What is proxemics?

The study of how people use space.

3
New cards

Name the four zones of informal space according to Edward T. Hall.

Intimate (0-1.5 ft), Personal (1.5-4 ft), Social (4-12 ft), Public (over 12 ft).

4
New cards

What are the two competing needs humans have?

Affiliation and Personal Space.

5
New cards

What is the 'threat threshold' in the original theory?

The imagined outer boundary of a person's intimate space, which can trigger an arousal response when violated.

6
New cards

What is arousal?

A heightened physiological state of alertness.

7
New cards

How is valence defined in the original theory?

A positive or negative feeling in response to arousal (e.g., excitement vs. fear).

8
New cards

What key concept did Burgoon eliminate from the original theory?

The 'threat threshold.'

9
New cards

What is an expectancy based on?

Social norms and schemata (mental models of social routines).

10
New cards

How is an expectancy defined in the updated theory?

A prediction, not a desire.

11
New cards

What did Burgoon replace 'arousal' with?

The orienting response, a form of attention to something new or novel.

12
New cards

What two main factors determine the interpretation of a violation?

Communicator Reward Valence and Violation Valence.

13
New cards

What is Communicator Reward Valence (CRV)?

The perceived net positive or negative value of future interaction with the person who committed the violation.

14
New cards

What is Violation Valence?

The interpretation of the specific behavior itself as positive or negative.

15
New cards

How can a violation of social norms be positive?

If the Communicator Reward Valence and the Violation Valence are both positive, it can lead to a positive reaction (e.g., a friend moving closer to you, which you welcome).

16
New cards

Besides proxemics, what are some other contexts where Expectancy Violations Theory can be applied?

Violations of eye contact, social routines, or other social norms.

17
New cards

What is the result if an expectancy is violated and the interpretation is ambiguous?

The reaction depends on the Communicator Reward Valence and can be mixed.