1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
chi-square test
used variables of interest are nominal variables
chi-square test for goodness of fit
examines how well an observed frequency distribution of a nominal variable fits some expected pattern of frequencies
chi-square test for independence
examines whether the distribution of frequencies over the categories of one nominal variable is unrelated to the distribution of frequencies over the categories of a second nominal variable
observed frequency
in a chi-square test, number of individuals actually found in the stduy to be in a category or cell
expected frequency
in a chi-square test, number of people in a category or cell expected if the null hypothesis were true
chi-square statistic
reflects the overall lack of fit between the expected and observed frequencies
chi-square distribution
mathematically defined curve used as the comparison distribution in chi-square tests; distribution of the chi-square statistic
chi-square table
table of cutoff sccores on the chi-square distribution for various degrees of freedom and significance levels
contingency table
two-dimensional chart showing frequencies in each combination of categories of two nominal variables
possible to have larger ones such as 4×7
may have relatively few degrees of freedom
independence
situation of no relationship between two variables; term usually used regarding two nominal variables in a chi-square test for independence
cell
in chi-square, the particular combination of categories for two variables in a contingency table
key idea to keep in mind when figuring expected frequencies in a contingency table is that “expected” is based on the two variables being independent
if they’re independent, then the proportions up and down the cells of each column should be the same
phi coefficient
effect-side measure for a chi-square test for independence with a 2×2 contingency table
cramer’s phi
measure of effect size for a chi-square test for independence with a contingency table that is larger than 2×2. AKA cramer’s V.
what are the assumptions for chi-square tests?
the chi-square tests of goodness of fit and for indepenndence do not require the usual assumptions of normal population variances and such
each score must not have any special relation to any scores. this means you can’t use these chi-square tests if the scores are based on the same people being tested more than once.
what is the controversy on chi-square tests?
lewis and burke considered the most common weakness in the use of chi-square to be that expected frequencies are too low. now, that’s not really much of a problem
lewis and burke held that every cell should have a reasonable sized expected frequencies such as a minimum of 10, with 5 as the bottom limit
others recommended figures from 1 to 20
what is the most important principle among the controvery of chi-square tests?
there should be at least five times as many individuals as there are cells
what do chi-square tests in research articles look like?
includes the degrees of freedom, N, the chi-square, and significance level
X² (df, N = _ _) = (chi-square), p < .05 (or n.s. if not significant)