ECON8010 Masterlist

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/28

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

kms

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

29 Terms

1
New cards

x is at least as good as y

x≿y

2
New cards

x is strictly preferred to y

x≻y

3
New cards

x is indifferent to y

x∼y

4
New cards

Compensated Law of Demand

(p′ − p) · (x(p′, p′ · x(p, w)) − x(p, w)) ≤ 0

5
New cards

Slutsky Matrix (x(p,w))

S(p,w) = Dpx(p,w) + Dwx(p,w) * x(p,w)T

6
New cards

Slutsky Compensation

wc = pa1a0 + pb1b0

7
New cards

Slutsky Substitution + Income Effects

Slutsky substitution effect = xc − x0
Slutsky income effect = x1 − xc

8
New cards

The Slutsky Equation (Hicksian)

Dph(p,ū) = S(p,w)

These are equal to the substitution effect

9
New cards

Negative Semidefinite

2×2
Check the principal minors.
| a b | a ≤ 0
| c d | ad-bc ≥ 0

3×3
Check if its skew-symmetric:
diagonals = 0, off-diagonals are negatives of each other

10
New cards

Walras’ Law (Demand)

p ⋅ x(p,w) = ∑​pi​xi​(p,w) = w

the consumer always spends all their wealth

11
New cards

Setup to check WARP

Set up choices:
At prices p,w, bundle x is chosen.
At prices p′,w′ bundle x′ is chosen.

Check affordability:

Is x′ affordable at (p,w)? i.e. p ⋅ x′ ≤ w

Is x affordable at (p′,w′)? i.e. p′ ⋅ x ≤ w′

Check violation:

If x chosen at (p,w) and x′ affordable there, then we need x′ not chosen at (p′,w′) when x is affordable.

If both cross-affordability conditions hold (each is affordable when the other is chosen), then WARP is violated.

12
New cards

homogeneous of degree zero (HD0)

x(p,w) = x(αp,αw) for all α > 0

13
New cards

Lagrangian for the UMP with 2 goods

L(x1​,x2​,λ) = u(x1​,x2​) + λ(w−p1​x1​−p2​x2​)

(λ = marginal utility of income)

14
New cards

How to find the MRS

MU1/MU2 = ∂u(x)/∂x1 / ∂u(x)/∂x2 = λp1/λp2 = p1/p2

15
New cards

Walrasian-Hicks Relations

x(p,w) = h(p, v(p,w))
h(p, ū) = x(p, e(p, ū))

v(p, e(p, ū)) = ū
e(p, v(p,w)) = w

16
New cards

Shepard’s Lemma

pe(p, ū) = h(p, ū)

17
New cards

Roy’s Identity

xi(p, w) = (-Dpiv(p, w))
.. . . . . .(∂/∂w v(p, w))

18
New cards

Compensating variation CV

e(p′, v(p0, w)) − w

p0p1 h(p,u0) dp

19
New cards

Equivalent variation EV

w − e(p0, v(p′, w))

p0p1 h(p,u1) dp

20
New cards

Envelope Theorem

dc(w,q)/dq = dL(w,q,z,λ)/dq

21
New cards

UMP
EMP
PMP
CMP

x(p,w), v(p,w)
h(p,u), e(p,u)
π(p), y(p)
z(w,q), c(w,q)

22
New cards

Arrow-Pratt coefficient of absolute risk aversion

rA(x,u) = -u’’(x) / u’(x)

23
New cards

Expected Utility (Discrete)

EU = p1u(x1) + p2u(x2) + …

24
New cards

Expected Utility (Continuous)

EU = ∫-∞ u(x)g(x)

Only when G(x) has a density

25
New cards

Certainty Equivalent

u(c) = E[u(w)]

26
New cards

Condition for FOSD

F ≿FOSD G if G(x) ≥ F(x) for all x

27
New cards

Condition for SOSD

If F & G have the same mean, F ≿SOSD G if 0xG(t)dt > 0xF(t)dt

28
New cards

Maximum Buying Price
Minimum Selling Price

u(without lottery) = u(with lottery (include buying price P))
u(with lottery) = u(sell lottery (include selling price S))

29
New cards

Bayes’ Rule

P(A∣B) = P(B∣A)P(A) / P(B∣A)P(A)+P(B∣Ac)P(Ac)