Political approaches in education
social democrat view
Left wing
Reduce inequality
Focus on under achieving groups
Improve social mobility
Widen participation
new right view
Provide choice
encourage different types of school
Reduce state control
Drive up standards
The Forster education act
1870
Introduced free state school (5-12 primary education).
To improve skills for industrial society.
Butler education act
1870
Provided free secondary education for all pupils
Students sat the 11 plus test to determine the school that the would go to
PASS - grammar school (academic curriculum, higher education)
FAIL - secondary modern school (practical curriculum, core subjects)
FAIL - technical school ( technical skills suited for a particular path eg mechanics)
These three schools were known as the tripartite system
Aim was to ensure a meritocracy
impacts
Lead to social class inequality
Middle class kids more likely to pass 11 plus due to connections and wealth
Selection from schools - selected in ability (middle class kids were higher ability)
11 plus added immense amounts of pressure to children
expansion of comprehensives
1965
Mixed ability schools made due to criticisms of tripartite system
One school for all
Aim was equality
impacts
Mixed ability didn’t stretch over achievers or support needs of under achievers
No selection
Large schools pupils feel ‘lost’
Streaming labels inequality
became known as the tripartite system under one roof
Children attended local schools so wealthy catchment areas performed better and poorer areas underperformed
Education reform act
1988
Influenced by Chubb and moe
Conservative government
National curriculum (all pupils learnt the same subjects and content)
SATs and GCSEs introduced
More parental choice
Funding per pupil
Parents could access league tables + choose
Aim to raise standards and high achievement for every pupil
Impacts
Positive
allowed choice
School standards improved
More accountable to parents
Negative
increased inequality
Best schools oversubscribed leading to selectivity (picked children who were more academic - wealthy)
Cream skimming and silt shifting
The myth of parentocracy
Parentocracy
Skilled choosers
professional middle class parents using their capital to take advantage if the choices open to them
Semi skilled choosers
working class parents who are ambitious for their children but don’t have the capital
They find it difficult to make sense of the education system
Rely on others opinions
Disconnected choosers
working class parents who lack capital and lack confidence in choice
Choose local schools pupils feel as it’s the only realistic option
Coalition government policies
2010-2015
Conservative and Liberal Democrat joined
Cut EMA and replaced it with bursary
Tripled tuition fees to £9000
Growth of academies
Free school meals
Free schools set up by parents and teachers
More Linear A level system (A* grade added)
Aim to focus on driving up standards
impacts
Some funding for disadvantaged schools
Increased inequality as middle class benefitted from choice
Cuts in funding disadvantaged poorer groups
Conservative
2015
continued to marketise education
Wanting an expansion of grammar schools (free but selective)
impacts
Still some economic support for disadvantaged groups
Social inequality remains a problem
Middle class still benefit from choice
Globalisation (definition and impacts on education)
Process of the world becoming more interconnected.
Impacts on education
TNCs - Apple, Google, Microsoft - home learning support
Response to global crisis such as pandemic, action plan is needed in schools
Expanding national curriculum - social media and digital skills.
Vocational education
Eductaion that prepares children for a skilled craft
Introduced in the 1980s by conservative
advantages
Better fits the needs of industry workers
Suits less academic children
Provides more choice
Criticisms
Working class children more likely to opt out of these qualifications
Seen as inferior to A-levels