TESTS FOR VICARIOUS LIABILITY

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

21 Terms

1
New cards

How many tests are there for vicarious liability

4 tests

2
New cards

What are the 4 tests

  • old (traditional test for VL)

  • control test

  • Integration/organisation test

  • Economic reality/multiple test

3
New cards

What two points does the old (traditional test) entail

1) is the tortfeasor an employee

2) Was the tort committed in the course of employment

4
New cards

Regarding the old (traditional test), why does the employee status of the tortfeasor matter

Because employees are not liable for independent contractors. The employee has a contract of service, where the contract sets out terms of employment. Whereas the independent contractors has a contract for service in which they provide work for the business but dont work directly for the business

5
New cards

Which tests to identify an employee are new

1) The control test

2) The integration/organisation test

3) The economic reality/multiple test

6
New cards

What is a short summary of the control test

Does the employee control how the work is done?

7
New cards

What is a short summary of the integration/organisation test

Is the worker part of the business?

8
New cards

What is a short summary of the economic reality/multiple test

It considers pay, equipment and independence etc

9
New cards

According to the control test, when is the employer more liable

The employer is more likely liable if they have control over hiring and firing, method of work and payment

10
New cards

What key case identified key control features for the control test

Short v J.W. Henderson

11
New cards

What is a case regarding the control test, where the original employer was still liable

Mersey Docks v Coggins

Hawley v Luminar leisure

12
New cards

Who set out the integration/organisation test

Lord Denning, in the case of Stevenson, Jordan and Harrison v McDonald and Evans

13
New cards

According to the integration/organisation test, what makes a worker an employee

The worker is an employee if their role is fully integrated into the business. If the work is only accessory, they’re not an employee.

14
New cards

Regarding the integration/organisation test, what is an example of an employee

Ship master, chauffer, staff reporter

15
New cards

Regarding the integration/organisation test, what is an example of someone who is not an employee

Ship pilot, taxi driver, report

16
New cards

Which case was the economic reality/multiple test set out in

Ready mixed concrete ltd v Minister of pensions

17
New cards

Regarding the economic reality/multiple test, how many conditions did the case of Ready mixed concrete ltd establish

3

18
New cards

Regarding the economic reality/multiple test, which 3 conditions did the case of Ready mixed concrete ltd establish

1) employee agrees to provide work for payment

2) employer has some control over employee and they accept

3) the rest pf relationship aligns with employment contract

19
New cards

What are other factors are considered in economic reality test

  • who owns the tools/equipment

  • How payment is made (salary vs lump sum)

  • Tax/national insurance/pension arrangements

  • Job title/self description

20
New cards

What cases are set out in the economic reality test

Carmichael v National power

Ferguson v Dawson

Viasystems v Thermal transfer

21
New cards

What did the case of Viasystems v Thermal transfer establish regarding the economic reality test

Dual vicarious liability is possible where 2 parties share control