1/127
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Evidence-based practice (EBP)
Involves using techniques that research has proven to work
EBP triangle
Clinical expertise
Client perspectives
Evidence
PICO
Method of framing a clinical question:
P = population
I = intervention
C = comparison
O = outcome
Internal evidence
Data that you systematically collect directly from your clients to ensure that they’re making progress.
May include subjective observations of your client as well as objective performance data compiled across time.
External evidence
Evidence from scientific literature—particularly the results, data, statistical analysis, and conclusions of a study.
Helps you determine whether an approach or a service delivery model might be effective at implementing change in individuals like your client.
Effectiveness
The probability of benefit from an intervention method under average condition
Efficacy
The probability of benefit from an intervention method under ideal conditions.
Refers to an identified population (ex: global aphasia), not to individuals.
Treatment protocol should be focused, and the population should be clearly identified.
Research should be conducted under optimal intervention conditions.
Efficiency
Results from application of the quickest method involving the least effort and the greatest positive benefit
Speech
The process of producing the acoustic representations or sounds of language. Features:
Articulation - how speech sounds are formed.
Fluency - the smooth, forward flow of communication.
Rate - the speed at which we talk.
Examples of nonverbal communication
Artifacts
Kinesics
Proxemics
Chronemics
Kinesics
Body language
Proxemics
Physical distance between people
Chronemics
The effect of time on communication
Disorders of articulation
Difficulty producing speech sounds correctly.
Can be difficult to distinguish if speech-sound errors indicate an impairment of phonology or articulation.
Error patterns point to phonological disturbances.
Ex: dysarthria, apraxia.
Dysarthria
Poor speech articulation caused by paralysis, weakness, or poor coordination of the muscles for speech
Apraxia
Disorder of motor programming (organization + planning); unrelated to muscle weakness
Stuttering
When disfluencies exceed the norm and/or are accompanied by excessive tension, struggle, and fear.
Fillers (er, um, ya know).
Hesitations (unexpected pauses).
Repetitions (g-g-go).
Prolongations (wwwwwell…).
Developmental _____ is first noticed before 6 y/o.
Adult onset dysfluency can be caused by advanced age, accidents, and disease.
Disorders of voice
Caused by vocal abuse: physical tension, excessive yelling/coughing, smoking, and alcohol consumption.
Hoarseness - voice lacks clarity and is noisy. D/t pathologies affecting VF vibration.
Disorders of form
Issues with phonology, morphology, syntax.
Ex: not producing the ends of words, incorrect word order, run-on sentences.
Causes: sensory limitations (hearing problems, perceptual difficulties), limited exposure to correct models, neurological disorders.
Disorders of content
Issues with semantics: limited vocabularies, misuse of words, word-finding difficulties.
Ex: difficulty understanding abstract language (metaphors, sarcasm), “thing” in replacement for the name of an object.
Causes: limited experience/concrete learning style, cerebrovascular accidents, head trauma, cognitive impairments.
Disorders of use
Issues with pragmatics: limited/unacceptable conversational, social, and narrative skills; deficits in spoken vocabulary.
Ex: difficulty staying on a topic, inappropriate responses to questions, constantly interrupting conversational partner.
Causes: ASD, environment, attention-deficits, neurologic disorders.
Prevalence
The number of people within a specified population who have a particular disorder or condition at a given point in time
Incidence
The number of new cases of a disease or disorder in a particular time period
Etiology
The cause of a disorder
Functional/idiopathic etiology
No known cause. Possible factors include:
Behavioral - children with older siblings and overindulgent parents may not feel the need to learn language.
Programming - Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) cannot program articulators.
Psychological - a bad home environment.
Modeling - if a caretaker has a lisp, the child might imitate it.
Middle ear infections - multiple infections can lead to hearing issues affecting articulation/phonology.
Organic etiology
Has a known cause. Possible factors include:
Neurologic problems - stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Cancer - laryngectomy/glossectomy may affect speech production.
Neurodegenerative diseases - ALS, Parkinson’s disease.
Congenital issues - cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, Pierre Robin syndrome.
Acquired issues - injury, cancer, most dysarthrias.
Structural issues - cleft palate or orofacial anomalies, often leading to resonant issues.
Motor/neurological - execution (dysarthria) and planning (apraxia) difficulties.
Sensory/perceptual - hearing impairment.
Psychological - most common with voice disorders.
Systemic - diseases causing weakness throughout the body; ex: Scleroderma, Myelitis.
Predisposing factors
Factors that underlie the problem (genetic factors)
Precipitating factors
Factors that triggered the disorder (stroke)
Maintaining/perpetuating factors
Factors that continue or add to the problem
Acute
A disorder with a sudden onset and short-term duration.
Ex: stroke, heart attack, TBI.
Chronic
When a disorder persists after spontaneous recovery, it is considered ____.
Ex: dysarthria still present 6 months post-stroke.
Progressive
A disorder that worsens over time.
Ex: PD, ALS, PSP, HD, MSA-C, MS.
Prognosis
Predicted outcome of treatment
Referral
Suggested appointment for evaluation, often initiated by doctors
Screening
Quick assessment to determine if there is a problem; no follow-up if no issues; comprehensive evaluation done if so
Comprehensive evaluation
Covers all aspects: oral mechanism, hearing, speech, language (expressive & receptive), fluency, voice, swallowing, cognition.
Depth of evaluation depends on judgment and age.
Subjective tests
Facility-created tests for specific facets
Objective tests
Published tests with extensive research
Case history
Includes relevant background information, such as:
Family’s concerns about the child’s speech, language, and literacy skills.
History of middle ear infections.
Family history of speech and language difficulties (+ reading and writing).
The language(s) and dialect(s) used in the home.
Teacher’s report of the child’s intelligibility, the child’s participation in the school setting, and how the child’s speech compares with that of peers in the classroom.
Oral peripheral sensory evaluation
Assesses presence/function of structures.
Dental occlusion and specific tooth deviations.
Structure of hard and soft palate (clefts, fistulas, bifid uvula).
Function (range of motion) of the lips, jaw, tongue, and velum.
Hearing screening
Assesses:
Otoscopic inspection of the ear canal and tympanic membrane.
Pure-tone audiometry.
Immittance testing to assess middle ear function.
Diadochokenesis
The ability to perform rapid, alternating movements, particularly those involving the speech muscles – /ptk/
Speech sound disorder (SSD)
Any difficulty or a combination of difficulties with perception, motor production, or phonological representation of speech sounds and speech segments, including phonotactic rules governing permissible speech sound sequences in a language.
Not all languages share the same speech sounds as mainstream American English. These influences do not indicate one.
Organic SSDs result from:
Motor/neurological disorders
Structural abnormalities
Sensory/perceptual disorders
Speech sound errors
Omissions/deletions
Substitutions
Additions
Disortions
Syllable-level errors
Inconsistent whole-word productions
Omissions/deletions
Certain sounds are omitted or deleted.
(e.g., /kʌ/ for “cup” and /pun/ for “spoon”)
Substitutions
One or more sounds are substituted, which may result in loss of phonemic contrast.
/θɪŋ/ for “sing” and /wæbɪt/ for “rabbit”
Additions
One or more extra sounds are added or inserted into a word.
/bəlæk/ for “black”
Distortions
Sounds are altered or changed.
Ex: a lateral /s/)
Phonological processes
Final consonant deletion
Weak syllable deletion
Reduplication
Consonant cluster reduction
Assimilation
Stopping
Fronting
These are considered language-based issues.
Final consonant deletion
Reduces CVC structure to more familiar CV.
/kæt/ becomes /kæ/
Weak syllable deletion
Reduces number of syllables to conform to the child’s ability to produce multisyllable words.
/tɛlɪfoʊn/ becomes /tɛfoʊn/
Reduplication
Syllables in multisyllable words repeat.
/beɪbi/ becomes /bibi/
Consonant cluster reduction
Reduces CCV+ structures to the more familiar CV.
/tri/ becomes /ti/
Assimilation
One consonant becomes like another, although the vowel is usually not affected.
/dɔgi/ becomes /gɔgi/
Stopping
Fricatives are replaced by stops.
/ðɪs/ becomes /dɪs/
Fronting
Velars are replaced with more anteriorly produced sounds.
/goʊ/ becomes /doʊ/
Accents
Systematic variations in speech production marked by differences in phonological and/or prosodic features, including rate and fluency, that are perceived as different from any native, mainstream, regional, or dialectal form of speech
Dialects
Rule-governed language systems that reflect the regional and social background of its speakers.
These rules cross all linguistic parameters, including phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics.
Accent modification
An elective service sought by individuals who want to change or modify their speech
Causes of SSDs
Biological sex.
Incidence is higher in males than females.
Pre- and perinatal problems.
Maternal stress, infections, delivery complications, preterm delivery, low birthweight.
Family history.
Children who have family members (parents or siblings) with speech and/or language difficulties were more likely to have a speech disorder.
Persistent otitis media with effusion (middle ear infection).
Associated with impaired speech development and hearing loss.
Speech sound assessment
Evaluates speech production using standardized tests and other methods. Assesses both single words and connected speech.
Single word testing.
Connected speech testing.
Severity
A qualitative judgment made by the clinician indicating the impact of the SSD on functional communication. Typically defined along a continuum from mild to severe or profound:
Mild - rare omissions and few substitutions.
Profound - extensive omissions and many substitutions; extremely limited phonemic and phonotactic repertoires.
Intelligibility
A perceptual judgment based on how much of the child’s spontaneous speech the listener understands.
Varies along a continuum ranging from intelligible to unintelligible.
Stimulability
The child’s ability to accurately imitate a model of the target speech sound that the child currently misarticulates
Speech perception
The ability to perceive acoustic differences between speech sounds
Phonological processing
The use of sounds of one’s language (phonemes) to process spoken and written language
Phonological awareness
The awareness of the sound structure of a language and the ability to consciously analyze and manipulate this structure via a range of tasks, such as speech sound segmentation and blending at the word, onset–rime, syllable, and phonemic levels
Steps for treatment of SSDs
Establishment - eliciting target sounds and stabilizing production on a voluntary level.
Generalization - facilitating carryover of sound productions at increasingly challenging levels.
Maintenance - stabilizing target sound production and making it more automatic; encouraging self-monitoring of speech and self-correction of errors.
Types of target attacks
Vertical
Horizontal
Cyclical
Vertical attack
Intense practice on one or two targets until the child reaches a specific criterion level (conversational) before proceeding to the next target(s)
Horizontal attack
Less intense practice on a few targets. Multiple targets are addressed individually or interactively in the same session, providing more exposure
Cyclical attack
Incorporating elements of both horizontal and vertical attacks
Contextual utilization approach
Type of SSD treatment.
Focuses on producing speech sounds in syllable-based contexts.
Helps children who use a sound inconsistently.
Aims to facilitate consistent sound production in various contexts.
Core vocabulary approach
Type of SSD treatment.
Targets whole-word production for children with inconsistent speech.
Uses frequently used words in the child's communication.
Suitable for those resistant to traditional therapy methods.
Cycles approach
Type of SSD treatment.
Targets phonological pattern errors in children with unclear speech.
Treatment is scheduled in cycles (5-16 weeks).
Focuses on stimulating the emergence of sounds, not mastery.
Designed for children with highly unintelligible speech with extensive omissions, some substitutions, and a restricted use of consonants.
Integrated phonological awareness (IPA)
Type of SSD/CAS treatment.
Improves understanding of sound structure in spoken language.
Combines phoneme awareness with letter-sound knowledge.
Phoneme manipulation, phoneme identity, phoneme segmentation, phoneme blending, and linking speech to print.
Best for children 4-7 y/o with mild-severe CAS + language impairment.
Metaphon therapy
Type of SSD treatment.
Teaches awareness of phonological structure in language.
Focuses on sound properties that need to be contrasted.
Assumes that children with phonological disorders have failed to acquire the rules of the phonological system.
Phase 1: expands knowledge of sound systems.
Phase 2: applies this knowledge in communication and self-monitoring.
Naturalistic speech intelligibility intervention
Type of SSD treatment.
Targets sounds in natural activities (menus, books).
Uses recasting of errors without direct prompts.
Effective for children who can use recasts well.
Phonological contrast approaches
Type of SSD treatment.
Focus on sound contrasts to differentiate words. Types:
Minimal oppositions
Maximal oppositions
Treatment of the empty set
Multiple oppositions
Speech motor chaining
Type of SSD treatment.
Involves repeated practice of speech targets. Phases include:
Prepractice/elicitation: distinguishing correct vs. incorrect sounds.
Structured practice: progresses from syllables to sentences.
Syllables → monosyllabic words → multisyllabic words → phrases → self-generated sentences.
Randomized practice: varies stimuli for better learning.
Speech sound perception training
Helps children develop stable perceptions of target sounds.
Focuses on attending to acoustic cues in different contexts according to a language-specific strategy.
Includes tasks like identification and discrimination of sounds.
Dynamic temporal and tactile cueing (DTTC)
Type of SSD/CAS treatment.
Intensive motor-based treatment for severe apraxia of speech.
Targets a small number of functional words and phrases.
Involves drill-type practice for better speech production.
Emphasizes shaping of movement gestures.
Hierarchy of temporal delay - allows child to take increasing responsibility for executing the motor plans.
Simultaneous production → immediate repetition → repetition after delay → spontaneous production.
Persisting speech difficulties
Difficulties in the normal development of speech that do not resolve as the child matures or even after they receive specific help for these problems
Traditional approach
SSD treatment that hierarchically focuses on one or two sounds at a time
Minimal oppositions/pairs
Uses pairs of words that differ by only one phoneme signaling a change in meaning.
/doʊɹ/ vs. /soʊɹ/
Phoneme collapse
When one sound substitutes many sounds, such as /d/ for /d, f, tʃ, s, t, st/
Phonological process approach
Treatment for SSDs.
Looks at the process that's happening, rather than specific error (ex: fronting).
Might carry over through whole phonemic repertoire
Start at sound level, see stimulability (prognostic indicator).
Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation
Old test is appropriate for kids ages 3-7; new one is 3-21.
Sounds in sentences, sounds in words, spontaneous language, and stimulability.
Plate picture faces child, script faces clinical, model word with mouth covered if child doesn’t say desired word.
Newer version looks at vowels.
Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS)
Believed to be caused by deficits in the planning and programming of movement gestures for speech production.
Often occurs along with language and phonologic impairment (deficit relates most towards a child's ability to specify parameters of movement).
Main speech characteristics:
Vowel and consonant distortions.
Inconsistent voicing errors.
Prosodic errors, especially equal stress and segmentation.
Awkward and/or imprecise movement transitions.
Groping and/or trial and error behavior.
Praxis
Planning/programming movement
Muscle tone
State of partial contraction of muscle fibers at rest and in response to passive stretch.
Maintained by processes with special influence by the cerebellum:
Gamma loop
Stretch reflex
Not the same as reduced strength.
Strength
Associated with muscle contraction causing movement of a structure.
Movement requires recruitment of upper motor neurons (UMN) to communicate with lower motor neurons (LMN).
LMN innervates muscles, leading to contraction and movement.
Each LMN sends fibers that branch around multiple muscle fibers.
Each muscle fiber may receive input from several LMNs.
Increases through:
Overloading the muscle.
Increasing size and number of muscle fibers (muscle mass).
Recruiting more motor units.
Increasing firing rate of motor units.
Parameters of movement
Range of motion
Direction of movement
Speed
Force
Amount of muscle tension
Oral non-verbal apraxia
Difficulty with non speech volitional movement (kiss, cough, lip smack)
Ataxic dysarthria
Only dysarthria not associated with weakness.
Impaired coordination in movement of the oral articulators.
Inaccurate movements, inconsistent voicing errors, imprecise articulatory contacts, incoordination of respiratory stream.
Deficits in cerebellum.
Can be difficult to differentiate between it and CAS in children.
Ataxic gait
Wide stance, unsteadiness in trunk, tendency to lunge/jerk sideways
Protocol for CAS testing
Language sample
Test of articulation/phonology
Structural/functional examination
Motor speech examination (biggest indicator)
Motor speech exam (MSE)
Allows the clinician to observe speech production across utterances that vary systematically in length and phonemic complexity.
Allows observations of those behaviors frequently associated with deficits in speech praxis (distortions, timing errors, dysprosody, inconsistency) across hierarchically organized stimuli.
Dynamic assessment encouraged.
Dynamic assessment
Cueing is provided to facilitate performance and thereby reveal emerging skills