- According to Williams, why is it so difficult to study early Islamic (Umayyad & Abbasid) textiles?
a. It is difficult to study due to their general poor preservation which leaves little to study and makes it more difficult to date and attribute. There is also a lack of scholarship on early Islamic textiles which creates a void of information for those interested in researching. Additionally, many museum collections mis-label textiles as “Coptic” which takes them out of the category of “Islamic”. - Williams discusses the possibility of lower-status imitations of high-status textiles.
What are the characteristics of “high-status” textiles?
High-status textiles often included red-hued silks which created a red background on which there would have been an Arabic inscription and a medallion pattern.
What are the characteristics of the “imitations”?
Imitations were most often made out of wool. This use of material was cheaper than the high status material of silk, and also was not capable of being repeated through a mechanize loom. Instead, woolen “tapestry-woven” fabrics needed to be hand-made.
- What limitations do the elite textiles (silk) present that the woolen textiles do not?
a. Silk did not have the ability of being created on a mechanized loom, meaning each piece required greater craftsmanship and time to be made. - What were the functions of the fabrics in William’s discussion?
a. Fabrics were used for a series of purposes, many to coat interiors with rich textures and colors. For example, textiles were used not only as rugs, but as wall hangings and curtains in archways between rooms. - What do textiles have in common with stucco décor in this time period?
a. There is an overlap in the designs during this period as stucco designs which emulate the “repetition and ease of repeating the pattern”.