Psych Tests Quiz 2

5.0(2)
studied byStudied by 14 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/19

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Psychology

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards
The Woodcock Johnson III
Psycho educational test package consisting of two co-normed batteries: Tests of Achievement and Test of Cognitive Abilities. Designed for people as young as 2 and as old as 90+
2
New cards
Halo Effect
A type of rating error wherein the rater views the object of the rating with extreme favor and tends to bestow ratings inflated in a positive direction
3
New cards
The MMPI
The product of a collaboration between psychologist Starke R. Hathaway and psychiatrist/neurologist John Charnley McKinley. It contained 566 true/false items. There are 10 clinical scales as well as validity, supplementary, content and Harris Lingoes seales
4
New cards
TAT
1) 30 picture cards, all black-and-white, contain a variety of scenes designed to present the test-taker with “certain classical human situations.”

2) It is the test takers  task to tell what events led up to that scene in the picture, what is happening at that moment, and what the outcome will be
5
New cards
Appearance
Are the patient’s dress and general appearance appropriate?
6
New cards
Behavior
Is anything remarkably strange about the patient’s speech or general behavior during the interview? Does the patient exhibit facial tics, involuntary movements, difficulties in coordination or gait?
7
New cards
Orientation
Is the patient oriented to person? That is, does he know who he is? Is the patient oriented to place? Does the patient have a sense of time? That is, does she know the year, the month, and the day? Does the patient know the situation at present?
8
New cards
Sensorium
Are there any problems related to the five senses?
9
New cards
Thought Process
Is it logical, coherent? Is there evidence of illogical statements? Tangentiality? Circumstantiality? Loose Associations? Blocking? Flight of Ideas? Illogical statements?
10
New cards
Thought Content
Normal to subject under discussion? Obsessions? Depressed? Paranoid? Delusions? Suicidal? Homicidal?  Angry? Anxious? Bizarre?
11
New cards
Affect
Is the patient’s emotional expression appropriate? For example, does the patient (inappropriately) laugh while discussing the death of an immediate family member? (Inappropriate Affect) Flat affect is no emotional expression. Blunted affect is a little emotional expression.
12
New cards
Mood
Throughout the interview, has the patient generally been angry? Depressed? Anxious? Apprehensive? Happy? Pleasant?
13
New cards
Insight
Does the patient realistically appreciate his or her situation and the necessity for professional assistance if such assistance is necessary? Does he/she realize they have a problem and need a solution?
14
New cards
Judgment
How appropriate has the patient’s decision making been with regard to past events and future plans?
15
New cards
Custody Evaluation
A psychological assessment of parents or guardians and their parental capacity, and/or children and their parental needs and preferences, usually undertaken for the purpose of assisting a court in making awards of custody with reports
16
New cards
Lesion
A pathological alteration of tissue, such as that which could result form injury or infection
17
New cards
Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery
Perhaps the most widely used fixed neuropsychological test battery. Subtests include Ctegory, Tactile Performance,  Rhythm, Speech-Sounds, Finger Tapping and others
18
New cards
Electroencephalograph (EEG)
A machine that measures the electrical activity of the brain by means of electrodes pasted to the scalp. Helpful in diagnosing seizure and other disorders
19
New cards
Pet Scan
A tool of nuclear medicine helpful in diagnosing biochemical brain abnormalities
20
New cards
Daubert Standard
Factors such as general acceptance in the scientific community or publication in a peer reviewed journal were simply some of many possible factors for judges to consider. Other factors judges might consider included the extent to which a theory or technique had been tested and the extent to which the theory or technique might be subject to error. Also the testimony of all experts, whether or not the experts claimed scientific research as a basis for their testimony.