1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
neuroimaging - ethical: raine
raine et al studied the brain activity of NGRIs compared to non-NGRIs using PET scans.
PET scans inject a radioactive glucose tracer. brain uses glucose to function so the brain areas that are more active will have a higher glucose metabolism
NGRIs lower activity in the brain areas responsible for emotional processing and impulse control such as the prefrontal cortex and amygdala
neuroimaging - unethical: phelps et al
fMRI scans to study brain activity related to unconscious racial evaluation
fMRI scans measure brain activity by detecting changes in the blood flow
strong magnet and radio waves, images showing which parts of brain are active
white participants viewed unfamiliar black and white male faces while measuring amygdala activation
they found greater amygdala activation to black versus white faces, indicating implicit racial bias.
brain enhancement - ethical: pitman et al
patients either received propranolol (medication for heart problems or anxiety)
or placebo within 6 hours of traumatic event
PTSD symptoms were measured at 1 month using a structured clinical interview
3 months later, emotional reactivity was assessed using a script-driven imagery test
propranolol group had lower PTSD symptoms, suggesting reduced traumatic memory consolidation
brain enhancement - unethical: darps, modafinil
cns stimulant that treats excessive sleepiness caused by narcolepsy
improves performance in high stress, sleep-deprived situations such as helicopter simulations
aims to boost soldier capabilities like endurance
may have civilian applications
neuroimaging - ethical: mayberg
electrodes implanted into brain + electrical impulses stimulate certain brain areas
has shown safety efficacy in treated movement disorders
also caused increase of interest and dbs has been able to grow better and techniques have been able to improve
neuroimaging - unethical: castrioto
electrodes in brain send electrical impulses to target brain areas
both motor and non-motor improvements
can cause excessive inhibition, affecting movement, cognition and emotions
home - YES: benjamin & gebbert
90 parents rated their youngest night trained child on interactions during night training
positive reinforcements (hugging, kissing) encouraged staying dry
punishment (shaming, spanking) delayed learning
operant conditioning helps learn key behaviours, punishment hinders progress
home - NO: george holden
audiotaped families in the evening over 15 night period
41 incidents of smacking or hitting
ten minutes after being smacked, children were misbehaving again in 75% of incidents
therefore, hitting to control behaviour is ineffective + counterproductive
school - YES: lee ross, lewin
spiral model: as each cycle pass, stricter more rewarding methods used to see how student behaviour develop over time
more positive reinforcement → more likely to respond than when less positive reinforcement was used
therefore, posit. reinfo. can yield continuity of positive behaviour
school - NO: lepper et al
one group children told they would get reward playing with markers
another group got no reward, then got surprise reward
told get no reward, significantly less interested in playing with markers
therefore, using conditioning can reduce intrinsic motivation to do tasks, shouldn’t be used
vulnerable groups - YES: wolf, risely and mees
time outs effective in reducing stuttering and behavioural issues
token economic successful in teaching reading, increasing work time, improving behaviour by rewarding positive behaviour
therefore, operant cond. should be used can enhance behaviour through strategic use of rewards and punishment
vulnerable groups - NO: the independent
judge rotenberg centre ruled by judge to continue using electric shocks to manage inappropriate behaviours in special needs students
some parents praised the technique as life-changing
therefore, shouldn’t be unethical, no longer method that is used