1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
intro
A list of baseless and fabricated allegations was prepared against Hazrat Usman (RZ).
He was accused of the following charges
Appointment of Relatives (Charge of Favoritism)
It was alleged that Hazrat Usman (RZ) placed his relatives in important positions of authority.
He appointed members of his own clan, the Umayyads, as governors in Syria, Egypt, Kufa, and Basra.
Hazrat Muawiya (RZ), who had already been appointed governor of Syria by Hazrat Umar (RZ), was allowed to continue in his post by Hazrat Usman (RZ).
In Egypt, Hazrat Amr bin Al-A’as (RZ) was replaced by Hazrat Abdullah bin Saad (RZ) because Hazrat Amr (RZ) could not efficiently manage the revenue system.
Hazrat Abdullah bin Saad (RZ) conquered a larger part of Egypt and extended Muslim rule to North Africa.
In Kufa, Hazrat Saad bin Abi Waqqas (RZ) was replaced by Walid bin Uqba due to Hazrat Saad’s (RZ) inability to control the province effectively.
Walid bin Uqba served the people of Kufa to the best of his ability and conducted successful campaigns in Azerbaijan and Armenia.
In Persia, Hazrat Abdullah bin Amr (RZ), a cousin of the Caliph, replaced Hazrat Abu Musa Ashari (RZ) at the demand of the people of Basra.
Hazrat Abdullah bin Amr (RZ) conquered Fars, Seestan, Khurasan, and other regions.
These appointments were criticized as favoritism rather than merit.
It was alleged that executive posts should have been given to Hashimites, not Umayyads, creating differences between the two clans.
allegation regarding quran
Hazrat Usman (RZ) was accused of sacrilege and blasphemy for ordering the burning of copies of the Qur’an.
Since the Qur’an is the Holy Book, its burning was considered unholy by opponents.
In reality, this action was taken to destroy unauthentic copies and preserve unity among Muslims, preventing future misunderstandings.
allegation of misuse bait ul maal
He was accused of misusing Bait-ul-Maal by distributing wealth from conquered territories unjustly.
Hazrat Usman (RZ) was, however, a wealthy man from the beginning and spent his personal wealth for the welfare of Muslims rather than taking money from the public treasury.
It was alleged that he gave excessive wealth to his relatives because they were governors.
A rebel objected, saying:
“You unlawfully gave away wealth and property to your relatives; for instance, you once gave the entire booty to Abdullah bin Saad.”
Hazrat Usman (RZ) replied:
“I have given him one-fifth from one-fifth of the booty. And we have such examples during the caliphate of Abu Bakr (RA) and Umar.”
allegation of leniency towards governers
It was alleged that Hazrat Usman (RZ) was too lenient and failed to keep strict control over his governors.
This allegation was incorrect, as he punished Walid bin Uqba when complaints were proven
allegation regarding mosque
It was said that Hazrat Usman (RZ) showed disrespect by demolishing the old structure of the mosque.
In reality, this was done to expand the mosque, and the decision was taken with the consent of senior companions
allegation regarding grazing lands
It was alleged that Hazrat Usman (RZ) reserved grazing land for his personal camels.
One person objected:
“You have used your position for yourself and reserved grazing grounds for your camels.”
Hazrat Usman (RZ) replied:
“When I took the charge of caliphate, nobody in Medina had camels more than me. But today I possess only two camels and that only for the purpose of Hajj. However, the reserved grazing ground is used for state camels.”
allegation of too much love towards family
One person said:
“You love your family members most, and you give them heavy gifts.”
Hazrat Usman (RZ) replied:
“Love of family members is not a sin. And I give them gifts from my own possessions, not from the public treasury.”
Allegation Regarding Abu Dharr Ghifari (RA)
It was alleged that Hazrat Usman (RZ) expelled Hazrat Abu Dharr Ghifari (RA) from Medina.
This was incorrect; Hazrat Abu Dharr (RA) was distressed by the luxurious lifestyle of Medina and chose to live alone outside the city.
The Holy Prophet (ﷺ) had foretold about him:
“He spends his life all alone, death will single him out and on the Day of Resurrection he will stand up all alone.”
role of rebels and conspiracys
These allegations created a snowball effect, leading to an uprising against the Caliph.
This movement was mainly led by Abdullah bin Saba.
When Hazrat Usman (RZ) learned of their conspiracies, he expelled them from Kufa and Basra.
The conspirators then spread their activities, particularly in Egypt, where some Jews who had outwardly accepted Islam joined them.
They incited Muslims in the name of Hazrat Ali (RZ), claiming that as the senior Hashemite, he deserved the caliphate.
They gained support from Muhammad bin Abu Bakr (RA), who held resentment because Hazrat Usman (RZ) appointed his foster brother as governor of Egypt instead of him.
After spreading influence in Kufa and Basra, the rebels prepared to march towards Madinah.
Hazrat Usman (RZ) remained lenient, considering them his Muslim brothers, which unfortunately encouraged the rebels further.