Legal and Psychological Aspects of Violence, Risk Assessment, and Criminal Justice

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/44

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

45 Terms

1
New cards

Parens patriae powers

Legal authority allowing states to confine sexually violent predators after prison for public safety and treatment.

2
New cards

Kansas v. Hendricks (1997)

Supreme Court decision upholding civil commitment of sexually violent predators as constitutional.

3
New cards

Megan's Law

Requires public notification of registered sex offenders living in a community.

4
New cards

Violence and severe mental illness

Most people with severe mental illness are not violent; risk increases mainly with substance abuse or severe symptoms.

5
New cards

Future dangerousness; Barefoot v. Estelle (1983)

Allowed expert testimony predicting a defendant's future dangerousness in death penalty cases.

6
New cards

Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California

Established a therapist's duty to warn or protect identifiable victims when a client makes credible threats.

7
New cards

Involuntary civil commitment vs. criminal confinement

Civil commitment is based on mental illness and dangerousness; criminal confinement is punishment after conviction.

8
New cards

Rates of antisocial personality disorder

About 1% in general population vs. about 50% in incarcerated populations.

9
New cards

Psychopathy characteristics

Traits including lack of empathy, superficial charm, manipulativeness, impulsivity, and chronic antisocial behavior.

10
New cards

Methods of risk assessment

Clinical judgment, actuarial tools, and structured professional judgment (SPJ).

11
New cards

Historical markers

Past factors such as prior violence or early criminal behavior.

12
New cards

Dynamic markers

Changeable factors like symptoms, stress, or substance use.

13
New cards

Risk-management markers

Future situational factors such as supervision or access to weapons.

14
New cards

Jurors' reactions to risk-assessment evidence

Jurors often overestimate the accuracy and scientific reliability of risk predictions.

15
New cards

Factors in sentencing decisions

Crime severity, prior record, guidelines, judge discretion, and offender/victim characteristics.

16
New cards

United States v. Booker (2005)

Made federal sentencing guidelines advisory, not mandatory.

17
New cards

Mandatory sentencing laws

Require fixed minimum prison sentences.

18
New cards

Solitary confinement

Isolation for 22-24 hours a day with minimal human contact.

19
New cards

Goals of punishment

Retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and restitution.

20
New cards

Restorative justice approach

Focuses on repairing harm through offender accountability and victim/community involvement.

21
New cards

National and international incarceration rates

The U.S. has one of the highest incarceration rates in the world.

22
New cards

Racial and gender disparities in incarceration rates

People of color and men are incarcerated at disproportionately higher rates; women's incarceration is increasing.

23
New cards

Prisonization

The process of adapting to prison norms and behaviors.

24
New cards

Criminogenic effect

When prison experiences increase the likelihood of future criminal behavior.

25
New cards

Problems with private prisons

Profit motives encourage cost-cutting, poor conditions, and incentives to keep incarceration high.

26
New cards

Alternatives to incarceration

Probation, diversion programs, treatment courts, electronic monitoring, and community service.

27
New cards

Furman v. Georgia (1972)

Struck down the death penalty due to arbitrary and inconsistent sentencing.

28
New cards

Bifurcated capital trial

Two-phase trial: guilt phase and penalty phase.

29
New cards

Gregg v. Georgia (1976)

Reinstated the death penalty with guided discretion procedures.

30
New cards

Atkins v. Virginia (2002)

Banned executions of individuals with intellectual disabilities.

31
New cards

Roper v. Simmons (2005)

Banned executions of people who committed their crimes under age 18.

32
New cards

Baze v. Rees (2008)

Upheld lethal injection as constitutional.

33
New cards

Glossip v. Gross (2015)

Reaffirmed that lethal injection protocols do not violate the Eighth Amendment.

34
New cards

Death-qualified jury characteristics

More punitive, more conviction-prone, and less diverse.

35
New cards

Lockhart v. McCree (1986)

Allowed exclusion of jurors who oppose the death penalty.

36
New cards

Racial disparities in death sentences

Death sentences are more likely when victims are white; Black defendants face higher risk.

37
New cards

Brutalization effect

Executions may increase homicide rates by normalizing state violence.

38
New cards

Liebman et al. (2000) study

Found about 68% of death sentences were reversed due to serious errors.

39
New cards

Police response to mental health crises

Police often respond first but lack specialized training.

40
New cards

Alternative response approaches

CIT teams, co-responder models, and non-police crisis response teams like CAHOOTS.

41
New cards

Public opinion regarding police accountability

Most Americans support reforms such as body cameras and independent oversight.

42
New cards

Mental health of law enforcement officers

High rates of stress, PTSD, depression, and suicide.

43
New cards

Types of deadly police force

Firearms, chokeholds, tasers used lethally, and vehicle force.

44
New cards

Police excessive force factors

Perceived threat, high civilian gun ownership, bias, and lack of accountability.

45
New cards

Ways to reduce excessive police force

De-escalation training, body cameras, early intervention systems, alternative responders, and civilian oversight.