1/7
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Types of documents
Public-charities, Ofsted reports, newspaper articles
Personal-diaries and letters
Historical-any docs from the past-(Aries) used paintings in study of childhood
Ways of interpreting documents
Positivists dislike
Often unstandardised-cannot generalise as is unique interpretation
Is unrepresentative-only literate group included
Researchers may insert own meanings
Interpretivists Like
Qualitative data-validity through authentic statements-weren't made for research
Documents-Practical Advantages and Disadvantages
+public=cheap and readily available-wealth of data
+Readily available as is secondary data is
+only source of information about past events
-Subjective
-lack of access as personal docs may be damaged or lost
-Difficulty to interpret-language barriers+changing meanings-may need to hire translator e.g for Znaniecki study
Documents-Ethical Advantages and Disadvantages
+No need for informed consent as data in the public sphere e.g Ofsted reports
+No psychological or physical harm as no people experimented on-secondary
-Person who wrote docs may not be alive to consent-e.g Anne Frank's diary
-May be sensitive data
Documents-Theoretical Advantages and Disadvantages
Interpretivists=+
+Valid as authentic statements and Verstehen-insight
Positivists=-
-May not be representative as docs could be lost or damaged-small scale
-Lacks validity-may not be authentic
-Not reliable-personal interpretations-cannot precisely replicate to make comparisons-subjective interp
Examples of case studies
Personal Docs-Thomas+Znaniecki-did study of experience of polish immigrants in Chicago-insight into motivations
Eval-may be giving a rose-tinted view to put family in Poland at ease
History example-Aries used paintings in study of childhood-looked into childrearing manuals-kids like mini adults in past-now child-centred
4 Key things when assessing documents (Scott)
Authenticity-is it genuine-is it a copy, how much of a document do you have
Credibility-is it sincere and believable or a one-sided version
Representativeness-does it cover the whole cross section of society to generalise-may not have responses from all groups-not all documents survive
Meanings-researchers may need special skills to understand the document-e.g a translator-diff sociologists Interp differently
Content Analysis
Analysing documents produced by the mass media-allows quantitative data to be produced
Category=gender stereotypes-e.g how may times women are used in cleaning ads compared to men
-Researcher decides categories and what is important-quite subjective