1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What is the white coat halo and why can it be dangerous?
uniform and status of doctors making them appear trustworthy but can mean that their wrongs can sometimes be left unquestioned
Who led the classic shock experiement?
Milgram
Describe the set up for Milgram's shock experiment:
1) ordinary people were invited to ask questions to a 'answerer' and shock them with increasing voltage if they answer incorrectly
2) orders were given by a scientist in a white coat who would respond to any objections with "the experiment requires that you continue"
3) shock victims would beg for mercy
How did participants predict they would perform in the shock delivering experiment in terms of their highest voltage before the disobey orders?
the average prediction was shock level 9
Fill in the gap: in Milgram's shock experiment, not 1 person disobeyed until shock level __
20
Fill in the gap: in Milgram's shock experiment __% actually went to full shock (death inducing)
63%
Describe the Market Research Study:
1) 9 person participants panels were presented with a legal case where a company was unfairly targeting a member of staff
2) they were asked to discuss and sign in favour of the company
Fill in the gap: only _/33 panels all signed the market research case
4
Give the 3 factors that affect group behaviour in Latane's Law of Social Impact:
1) number of people
2) strength/ legitimacy of others
3) immediacy
Describe the setup of the smoke test:
students were left alone or in a group of 3 in a waiting room and a stream of smoke entered the room
Describe the results of the smoke test:
75% of those alone reported the steam in 2 minutes but in groups of 3, <13% reported in 6 minutes
Give 3 social processes in emergencies which explain bystander apathy:
1) diffusion of responsibility
2) social definition (if others don't respond, is it an emergency?)
3) audience inhibition
Give 3 non-social factors which determine whether we help in emergencies:
1) ambiguity of the situation (what's going on?)
2) personal threat/ cost of intervention
3) one's personality