Moral Issues Unit 2

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

12 Terms

1
New cards

Contentious Speech

Speech that is controversial

2
New cards

Hate Speech

Language (oral or written) that expresses strong hatred, contempt, or intolerance for some social group, particularly social groups classified according to race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, disability, or nationality

3
New cards

Microaggressions and trigger warnings

Microaggressions are small actions and word choices that may or may not involve malicious intent but nevertheless communicate negative attitudes toward a marginalized group. Trigger warnings are in the context of college and university campuses, warnings to students that the content of a written material, video, or course may be distressing

4
New cards

Liberty-Limiting Principles

A principle that purports to set forth conditions under which a government may be morally justified in passing laws that limit the liberty of its citizens

5
New cards

The Harm Principle

A liberty-limiting principle according to which a government may justifiably pass laws to limit the liberty of its citizens in order to prohibit individuals from causing harm to other individuals or to society

6
New cards

Mill: Arguments for Freedom of Thought and Speech

John Stuart Mill argued for freedom of thought and speech for four key reasons: to avoid human fallibility, to discover the full truth through the "marketplace of ideas," to understand truth more fully and "lively" even if it is known, and to prevent truth from becoming a "dead dogma" without vitality. He believed that suppressing any opinion, even a false one, is harmful because it robs humanity of the opportunity to gain truth, and it prevents people from deeply understanding and applying true beliefs

7
New cards

Causal Harm vs. Expressive Harm

Causal harm refers to the tangible, direct consequences of an action, while expressive harm is a more abstract, symbolic harm that results from the negative attitudes or messages conveyed by an act

8
New cards

Speech Codes

Regulations, often on college campuses, that restrict speech to maintain a specific campus climate, but raise moral issues by balancing the right to free expression against the harm of offensive speech, the protection of marginalized groups, and the creation of genuinely inclusive environments

9
New cards

Safe Space Movement

Encompasses the creation and advocacy of spaces—physical, digital, or social—where individuals, particularly marginalized groups, can feel accepted, supported, and safe to express themselves without fear of judgment, harm, or oppression

10
New cards

Vindictive Protectiveness

A pattern of culture that seeks to protect individuals from discomfort or offense by punishing the perceived aggressor, often with extreme hostility and a focus on individual transgressions rather than systemic issues

11
New cards

Emotional Reasoning

The cognitive distortion of believing something is true simply because one feels it to be true, without considering any objective evidence. In the context of moral issues, this means mistaking one's feelings for moral facts and allowing emotions to dictate ethical judgments

12
New cards

CBT: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

A form of evidence-based psychotherapy that helps individuals identify and change unhelpful thought patterns and behaviors to improve mood and function