Evaluating the Merits of Quantitative Research Studies in Kinesiology

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/9

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering key concepts related to evaluating the merits of quantitative research studies in kinesiology.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

Validity

The extent to which a research study accurately reflects or assesses the specific concept that the researcher is attempting to measure.

2
New cards

Logical Validity

The quality of researchers’ arguments, application of theory to support the need for the study, and appropriate interpretation of results based on data.

3
New cards

Construct Validity

The degree to which a test measures what it claims, or purports, to measure.

4
New cards

Internal Validity

The extent to which a study can show that the treatment or intervention caused an observed effect, free from other explanations.

5
New cards

External Validity

The extent to which the findings of a study can be generalized to contexts outside the study.

6
New cards

Reliability

The consistency of a measure; a measure is considered reliable if it would produce the same result if repeated.

7
New cards

Generalizability

The ability to apply the findings from a study to broader populations, settings, or times.

8
New cards

Experimental Design

A study design that includes the manipulation of an independent variable to determine its effect on a dependent variable.

9
New cards

Non-experimental Design

A research design that does not involve manipulation of an independent variable, often relying on observational data.

10
New cards

Nomological Network

A web of evidence that describes how different measures are related to various constructs and behaviors.