1/29
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Alcohol/Carboxylic Acid
OH pka = 15
Carboxylic pka = 5
Allylic
Radical on carbon next to carbon with double bond
resonance stabilizes and rxn proceeds easier
Allyl cation, radical, and anion
2 pi e-, 3 pi e-, 4 pi e-
have same molecular orbital diagram but different homo and lumo
Molecular Orbital Rules
number of orbitals in = number of orbitals out
adding nodes increases the amount of energy
when reading L —> R the orbitals should be symmetrical
when you have a weak nucleophile that would form no reaction, it can form a cation if it is allylic (good nucleophile will do sn2)
Radical Halogenation
Low Concentrations X2 with RO-OR or Hv reacts at allylic spot → adds one X
NBS/NCS with Peroxide adds TINY Br/Cl
Mechanism:
Initiation: Br2 homolytically cleaves
homolytic cleavage of H at allylic spot (weakest bond) + bond formation with radical from initiation
Draw possible resonance structures
Propagation two: homolytic cleavage of Br2 and bond formation with radical
Product: starting material with a Cl/Br at allylic position and Cl/Br radical
Possible Peroxides with NBS/NCS
(tBuO)2
(BzO)2
Reactions of Allylic Systems
Radical Halogenation: NBS/NCS w/ peroxide
Nucleophilic Substitution: sn1 with poor nucleophiles
Addition to electrophiles:
addition of Mg and THF to form organometallic
H attached to allylic carbon reacting with nBuLi and TMEDA to replace H with Li
TMEDA
nBuLi deprotonates H at allylic position and replaces it with Li
nBuLi with TMEDA
TMEDA boosts the reaction by coordinating to Li⁺ through two nitrogen lone pairs, increasing the reactivity of n-BuLi
C-H bond is ~40 while C-Li bond is ~50 so reaction will still proceed, but slowly and less effectively without TMEDA
Conjugation
3 sp2 p orbitals in a row
lowers energy of molecule and stabilizes
single bond separates the double bond
Diene
2 C=C bonds
Triene
3 C=C bonds
Alternating single and double bonds
Allene
Two adjacent double bonds
since adjacent, one orbital is up and down while the other is in and out
E vs Z
E is when high priority groups are on opposite sides
Z is when high priority groups are on same sides
Measuring stability + result of conjugated systems
△H°hydrogenation: energy released when pi bond breaks into sigma bond
One double bond reacting with H2/Pt = -30 kcal/mol
two double bonds reacting with H2/pt = -60 kcal/mol
Conjugated system reacting with H2/pt = -57 kcal/mol
Conjugation: Stabilizes starting material due to sp2 hybridization and p orbitals of adjacent bonds overlapping, allowing delocalization of pi electrons resulting in lower energy arrangement and increasing stability.
Characterization of Conjugated systems
Single Bond Shortens: single bond between two double bonds has overlap of p orbitals allowing delocalization resulting in a partial double-bond character on the single bond
Makes bond strong and shorter than normal c-c bond
Barrier to Rotation: Rotation around central bond would break p-orbital overlap, disrupting conjugation
conjugations lowers energy, breaking this system requires more energy
inhibits rotation —> higher rotational energy barrier than normal single bond
Bonding Orbitals
π3* = Antibonding - High energy
π2 = nonbonding - Neutral energy
π1 = bonding - Low energy
3 carbon conjugated system - MOD
π3* = red/blue : blue/red : red/blue = 2 nodes = highest energy state
π2 = red/blue: blue/red = 1 node = neutral energy state
π1 = red/blue, red/blue, red/blue = 0 nodes = low energy state
MOD is same for 2,3,4 pi e- allylic systems - HOMO/LUMO changes
4 carbon conjugated system MOD - Diene
2 double bonds = 4 pi bonds
no nonbonding orbitals in even number pi orbitals
π4* = red/blue : blue/red : red/blue : blue/red = 3 nodes = high energy
π3* = red/blue : blue/red : blue/red : red/blue = 2 nodes = high energy
π2 = red/blue : red/blue : blue/red : blue/red = 1 node = high energy
π1 = red/blue, red/blue, red/blue, red/blue = 0 nodes = lowest energy
Thermodynamic Product
Most stable form (most substituted double bond)
compare all resonance forms
Higher Ea + low energy product
favored at high temperatures
Kinetic Product
Fastest forming product
Lowest Ea
Favored at low temperatures
Can form at high temperatures
not favored due to ability to reverse reaction ability
Impact of Increasing Conjugation
More double bonds = more resonance = more stable
due to increasing # of overlapping adjacent p orbitals
Lower Ea —> lots of possible products (more resonance intermediates)
Polymerization side rxn increases —> due to stable intermediate formation —> reacts with itself
Benzene
Aromatic functional group
conjugated
not a triene
Diels-Alder Reaction
4+2 Cycloaddition between diene (4πe-) and dienophile (2πe-) with heat
Diene
Electron Rich —> Electron Donating Group (EDG)
R group
:O:R
:NR2
Me:O: (at position 3)
CH3 (at position one)
Hexane ring (connected at position 2/3) —> e- donating alkyl groups
Dienophile
Electron Poor —> Electron Withdrawing Group (EWG)
CF3
NO2
C≡N
-CR=O
Inductive Effect
Electronegativity acting at a distance
CH3 donates e- via hyperconjugation
3- in C-H sigma bond overlap with pi system, pushing e- density into pi system
stabilizes positive charges —> carbocation has empty p orbital, CH3 sigma bonds overlap with empty p orbital, partially delocalizing positive charge, stabilizing it
Resonance
Stronger effect than inductive effect
EDG: more e- density into π system
EWG: less e- density in π system
How do you know if you are working with a diels-alder reaction?
If you see a cyclohexene with at least one π bond
Diels-Alder Reaction Mechanism
Concerted Reaction!
Arrow from C1-C2 Diene π bond to C2-C3 σ bond
Arrow from C3-C4 Diene π bond to space between diene/dieneophile
Arrow from C1-C2 π bond from Dieneophile to upper space between diene/dieneophile
Diene Conformations - trans vs cis
s-trans: Thermodynamically favored and more stable
unreactive
s-cis: required for diels-alder reaction
Heat used to push this reaction
reactive